Abstract The spikes in the inertial sensor data have been found to impact on the retrieval of the non-gravitational signals and the evaluation of the inertial sensor performance. Removing the spikes in the inertial sensor is critical for studies of gravitational reference sensors in space-based gravitational wave detection missions and accelerometers in gravity satellite missions. Thanks to a long period of inertial sensor data without thruster spikes, we can conduct machine learning based on this data to remove spikes. In this paper, a machine learning model called bi-directional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) neural network was built based on the inertial sensor data of TianQin-1 (TQ-1) mission. We use the machine learning method to remove the spikes in the inertial sensor data. After removing the spikes in the inertial sensor data, acceleration noise is suppressed form 2.0×10 -7 ms -2 Hz -1/2 to the 2.8×10 -10 ms -2 Hz -1/2 at 0.1 Hz, which is far better than the existing methods, including the linear interpolation, data substitution and mean value of adjacent data.
The aim of this paper is to present an analytical relationship between the power spectral density of GRACE-like mission measurements and the accuracies of the gravity field coefficients mainly from the point of view of theory of signal and system, which indicates the one-to-one correspondence between spherical harmonic error degree variances and frequencies of the measurement noise. In order to establish this relationship, the average power of the errors due to gravitational acceleration difference and the relationship between perturbing forces and range-rate perturbations are derived, based on the orthogonality property of associated Legendre functions and the linear orbit perturbation theory, respectively. This method provides a physical insight into the relation between mission parameters and scientific requirements. By taking GRACE-FO as the object of research, the effects of sensor noises and time variable gravity signals are analyzed. If LRI measurements are applied, a mission goal with a geoid accuracy of 7.4 cm at a spatial resolution of 101 km is reachable, whereas if the KBR measurement error model is applied, a mission goal with a geoid accuracy of 10.2 cm at a spatial resolution of 125 km is reachable. Based on the discussion of the spectral matching of instrument accuracies, an improvement in accuracy of accelerometers is necessary for the match between the range errors and accelerometer noises in the future mission. Temporal aliasing caused by the time variable gravity signals is also discussed by this method.
One of the key constraints for the accelerometer of GRACE-type gravity satellites to accurately measure the non-gravitational accelerations acting on the satellite is that the center of mass of the satellite and the proof mass of the accelerometer should maintain a coincidence. In addition, the accuracy requirement is that the center of mass offset (CM-offset) in the three directions is less than 100 microns. Since the center of mass (CoM) of the satellite will change with the consumption of cold-gas fuel in the tanks, it is necessary to regularly carry out the CoM calibration maneuver. Firstly, the observation equations consisting of the accelerometer linear acceleration, angular acceleration, and the CM-offset vector are established in order to estimate the amount of CM-offset. Then, according to the estimated CM-offset, the satellite mass trim mechanisms are used to change the satellite’s CoM, so that the satellite’s CoM always approaches the proof mass of the accelerometer, with an accuracy of 100 μm per axis. The CM-offset of the satellite of GRACE-FO is estimated by using the accelerometer, star camera, magnetic torquer, magnetometer, and the precision orbit data during the GRACE-C CM-offset calibration period on 1 February 2020. Four kinds of CM-offset results are obtained by four different angular accelerations as follows: the angular acceleration based on the attitude dynamics (“MTQ angular acceleration”), the accelerometer angular acceleration calibrated by MTQ, the accelerometer angular acceleration, and the angular acceleration calculated by the star camera. By comparing the four kinds of CM-offset results that are estimated by the four different methods, all four of the results are shown to have the same level of accuracy. Based on the accelerometer (calibrated) angular acceleration, the difference with the JPL result is 0.5 μm, while the difference between the conventional method and the JPL result is 6.0 μm. All four of the methods can achieve the requirement of 50 μm accuracy and using four CM-offset estimation methods simultaneously can improve the integrity of the calibration results. Subsequently, the CM-offset results of GRACE-C since its launch are estimated here. The calibration algorithm that is proposed in this paper can be used as a reference in the calibration of gravity satellites carrying an accelerometer payload.
The time-wise and space-wise approaches are generally applied to data processing and error analysis for satellite gravimetry missions. But both the approaches, which are based on least-squares collocation, address the whole effect of measurement errors and estimate the resolution of gravity field models mainly from a numerical point of indirect view. Moreover, requirement for higher accuracy and resolution gravity field models could make the computation more difficult, and serious numerical instabilities arise. In order to overcome the problems, this study focuses on constructing a direct relationship between power spectral density of the satellite gravimetry measurements and coefficients of the Earth's gravity potential. Based on two-dimensional Fourier transform, the relationship is analytically concluded. By taking advantage of the analytical expression, it is efficient and distinct for parameter estimation and error analysis of missions. From the relationship and the simulations, it is analytically confirmed that the low-frequency noise affects the gravity field recovery in all degrees for the instance of satellite gradiometer recovery mission. Furthermore, some other results and suggestions are also described. Correspondence to: Zebing Zhou