Rates of obesity are elevated among children with special needs (e.g., autism spectrum disorder, Down syndrome, or developmental disabilities). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary tailored intervention to treat obesity among youth with special needs.Seventy-six children aged 2 to 19 years participated in a multidisciplinary weight management clinic adapted for children with special needs. A description of the patients presenting for specialized clinical services is provided, and the impact of the intervention on child body mass index (BMI) and food variety was examined for a subset (n = 30) of children. Descriptive statistics of the patient population at baseline were calculated and a series of t tests, correlations, and analysis of variance models examined change in BMI z-scores (BMIz) and diet variety. Factors related to treatment outcomes were also explored.BMIz decreased significantly by the 6-month follow-up (M = 2.43 to M = 2.36, p < .01). There were significant increases in the variety of fruits, vegetables, and grains that children ate (t(16) = 3.18, p < .01; t(16) = 2.63, p = .02; t(16) = 2.37, p = .03, respectively).A multidisciplinary clinic-based intervention was effective in reducing BMIz over a 6-month period and increasing the variety of foods that children were eating. These results have implications for providing tailored weight management interventions for youth with obesity and special needs.
To assess the feasibility and acceptability of yoga incorporated into a pediatric weight management program (promoting health in teens; PHIT Yoga) to racially diverse caregivers and youth and to compare this program with a cohort that received a program that did not include yoga (PHIT Kids).
This article is the sixth in a series of the comorbidities of childhood obesity and reviews psychosocial aspects with a focus on weight-based victimization and discrimination stemming from weight bias and stigma. Outcomes from these bullying and discriminatory experiences are pervasive and impact youth across all settings, including school. Lastly, this article provides recommendations on how to reduce bias and stigma to better serve these students in the school environment.
Background: The current study compares the effectiveness of a condensed 12-week version and a 24-week version of the same pediatric behavioral weight management program. Methods: Children (n=162) between the ages of 8 and 18 years (baseline BMIz=2.39; standard deviation=0.29) were randomized to either a 12- or 24-week version of the same behavioral weight management program. Child anthropometric data were recorded at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months. A two-level longitudinal model was used to examine within- and between-group differences in BMIz change over time. Results: A significant group-by-time interaction was found (β=−0.01; standard error, <0.01; p<0.01) with the 24-week group showing greater reductions in BMIz. Children in the 24-week group showed significant BMIz reductions over time (z=−5.18; p<0.01), but children in the 12-week group did not (z=−0.85; p=0.39). Conclusions: Children in the 24-week program demonstrated greater reductions in BMIz than children in the 12-week group. Therefore, there may be additional benefit to sessions above and beyond the 8- to 12-week minimum suggested for pediatric weight management programs.
Children with obesity may experience weight-based discrimination as a result of weight bias and stigma, which can have deleterious effects on their health and wellbeing, including increased risk of dysregulated, maladaptive, and disordered eating such as restriction, purging, and binging. Prior work has shown that weight bias occurs from healthcare workers caring for adults, but less is known about the prevalence of weight bias in the pediatric healthcare setting. We aimed to determine what proportion of pediatric healthcare professionals had attitudes of weight bias at our own institution by constructing a survey with questions from validated weight bias survey tools. Results revealed nearly half of all respondents had witnessed another healthcare professional make negative remarks about a patient with obesity, and many shared that they lacked the proper education/training and equipment to properly care for patients with obesity. Based on survey results, we created an electronic-based training module to educate healthcare professionals on weight bias and discrimination and how they may negatively affect care provided to children and families with obesity at our institution. Engagement with hospital leadership was a key strategy to ensure participation from medical and nursing/allied health staff in the survey, although only nursing/allied health leadership required the online training module resulting in limited physician engagement. Feedback received regarding the training module was overwhelmingly positive. Our efforts illustrate that weight bias and discrimination exist in pediatric institutions, and that participation in a tailored electronic-based training module may be viewed as a helpful tool to raise awareness of how weight-based discrimination and bias can negatively affect patient care. Weight bias and discrimination are present in pediatric healthcare settings and can lead to negative health effects for children with obesity, including increased risk of dysregulated, maladaptive, and disordered eating such as restriction, purging, and binging. Scientific studies on development of methods to address weight bias among child healthcare professionals is limited. In this article, we describe how we measured weight bias among clinical providers and staff in a large pediatric teaching hospital, and how this helped us obtain approval from hospital leaders to create training to help these child healthcare professionals understand the harmful effects of weight bias.
Racism and childhood obesity are both pervasive factors adversely affecting the health and wellbeing of children and adolescents in the United States. The association between racism and obesity has been touched upon in the literature; yet most work has focused on a few dimensions of intersectionality of these two domains at one time. The renewed focus on structural racism as the primary contributor to distress of Black individuals in the United States has highlighted the urgency of identifying the contributions of racism to the childhood obesity epidemic. The current article is not a complete review of the literature, rather, it is meant to take a broad narrative review of the myriad ways in which racism contributes to the obesity epidemic in Black youth to serve as a call to action for more research, prevention, and intervention. The current article illustrates how a number of mechanisms for the etiology and maintenance of obesity are heavily influenced by racism and how addressing racism is critical for ameliorating the childhood obesity epidemic.
Interprofessional pediatric obesity treatment teams may consider filing a report for medical neglect with their state child protection agency when a child's family is consistently non-adherent to treatment recommendations and the child is medically at risk. The multifactorial nature of the etiology and treatment of obesity makes this a challenging issue to navigate with families and child protection agencies. The aims of this article are to (a) highlight common challenges faced by teams when addressing medical neglect, and (b) offer insights on navigating the medical protection of children with obesity and associated medical conditions in a way that minimizes adverse outcomes.
