This record contains raw data related to article "SUOH 03 Guidewire for the Management of Coronary Artery Dissection: Insights from a Multicenter Registry" Abstract Background: In the setting of coronary artery dissection, both spontaneous and iatrogenic, fixing the intimal tear, usually with stent implantation, can be extremely challenging if the distal wire position has been lost. Common complications are mainly related to the inadvertent subintimal tracking of the guidewire while attempting to gain the distal true lumen. Aims: To report the registry results of using the SUOH 0.3 guidewire for managing coronary artery dissection in a real-world multicenter setting. Methods: The study population in this retrospective, multicenter, international registry included 75 consecutive patients who underwent PCI and required an antegrade wiring of a dissected coronary artery. Results: Successful use of SUOH 0.3 was achieved in 69 (92%) patients. The use of a microcatheter was associated with a significantly higher rate of TIMI 3 flow at the end of the procedure (no microcatheter: n = 17, 81%; microcatheter: n = 52, 96.3%; p = 0.017). The first recanalization attempt was made with the SUOH 03 guidewire in 48 (64%) cases, and it was successful in 42 (87%). The overall PCI success rate was reported in 72 (96%) patients, with no significant differences among patients with different origins, mechanisms, and locations of dissection. Conclusions: In this setting, the SUOH 0.3 guidewire provides high procedural success without additional complex techniques.
Importance Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has emerged as an alternative to drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) as well as de novo coronary artery disease. Observations DCBs are balloons coated with antiproliferative agents and excipients, whose aim is to foster favorable vessel healing after appropriate lesion preparation. By providing homogeneous antiproliferative drug delivery in the absence of permanent foreign body implantation, DCBs offer multiple advantages over DES, including preservation of vessel anatomy and function and positive vessel remodeling. As such, DCBs have become appealing for treatment of ISR, small-vessel disease, long lesions, simplification of bifurcation procedures, and treatment of diffuse distal disease after recanalization of chronic total occlusions. In addition, patients with high bleeding risk, diabetes, and acute coronary syndrome might also stand to benefit from DCB angioplasty. Conclusions and Relevance Although commercially available in numerous countries now for more than a decade, DCB only recently obtained US Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of coronary ISR. Moreover, preliminary results from newer generation devices tested in different clinical scenarios have raised the interest of the international community. Accordingly, an up-to-date review is timely particularly with the anticipated wave of research on the matter. Herein, this review encompasses DCB technologies, their worldwide usage, details on relevant indications, and key procedural aspects of DCB angioplasty.
Patients with tricuspid regurgitation are often referred late in their disease course and present with volume overload, which is a detrimental factor leading to right-sided chamber dilatation and dysfunction. Treatment of volume overload can 1) improve patient functional status; 2) avoid repeated invasive examinations; and 3) establish eligibility for transcatheter tricuspid intervention. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).
Abstract Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a modifiable risk factor for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Treatment with insulin correlates with advanced disease and has been associated with excess cardiovascular risk, but evidence on outcomes of patients with insulin‐treated DM (ITDM) undergoing left main percutaneous coronary intervention (LMPCI) remains scarce. Aims The aim of the presented study is to evluate the risk attributable to DM and ITDM in patients undergoing LMPCI. Methods We included 869 patients undergoing PCI for unprotected LMCAD. The cohort was divided into three subgroups based on diabetic status: No DM, ITDM, and Non‐ITDM. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as a composite of death, spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke at 1 year. Results were adjusted for clinically relevant baseline characteristics. Results Amongst participants, 58.7% had no DM, 25.9% non‐ITDM, and 15.4% ITDM. Diabetics were younger and more likely to be female. They also exhibited higher body mass index as well as prevalence of comorbidities, including hypertension, anemia, and chronic kidney disease. The number of bifurcation lesions and stents used was similar between groups. At 1 year, when compared to no DM, ITDM (25.4% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.01) but not non‐ITDM (10.8% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.94) demonstrated higher MACCE. This finding was driven by increased risk of MI. Mortality was 8.4%, 7.8%, and 17.2% for no DM, Non‐ITDM, and ITDM, respectively. Results remained unchanged after adjustment. Conclusions In a rather contemporary patient population undergoing PCI for LMCAD, ITDM but not non‐ITDM was associated with higher risk of 1‐year MACCE, primarily driven by MI.
Abstract Background The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is controversial. Purpose Our study aims to evaluate the impact of PPM on mortality and clinical-echocardiographic progression of cardiac damage in a "real world" cohort of patients at intermediate and low surgical risk and to characterize its main predictors. Methods 963 patients who underwent TAVI procedure between 2017 and 2021, from an international multicenter observational registry, were included in this analysis. Multiparametric echocardiographic data were analyzed at 1-year follow-up (FU). Clinical and echocardiographic features were stratified by presence of PPM and PPM severity, as per the most current international recommendations (VARC-3 criteria). Results 18% of patients developed post-TAVI PPM, (7.7% of the whole cohort severe). At baseline, 50.3% of patients with PPM were male (vs 46.2% in the cohort without PPM, p=0.33), aged 82y (interquartile range (IQR) 79-85y) vs 82y (IQR 78-86y; p=0.46), and 55.6% had Balloon-Expandable valves implanted (vs 46.8% of patients without PPM, p=0.04); they had smaller left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter (20mm, IQR 19-21 vs 20mm, IQR 20-22, p=0.02), reduced Stroke Volume index (SVi) (34.2 vs 38 ml/m2, p<0.01) and transaortic flow rate (190.6 vs 211 ml/s, p<0.01). At pre-discharge FU patients with PPM had more paravalvular aortic regurgitation (AR) (moderate/severe AR 15.8% vs 9.2%, p<0.01). At a median FU of 1.46 years (IQR 1-4), there was no evidence of a significant impact of PPM on overall mortality (15.3% vs 13.1%, p=0.46) nor on rehospitalization rate for heart failure (4.3% vs 8.0%, p=0.10). At 1-year FU, maladaptive alterations of left ventricular parameters were found in patients with PPM, with a significant increase in endsystolic diameter (ESD) (33 vs 28mm, p=0.03) and a statistically non-significant increase in LV mass index (121 vs 106g/m2, p=0.07). Interestingly, trajectory parameters of patients with PPM from baseline to 1-year FU showed a reduced cardiac remodeling compared to patients without PPM, including no LVEF improvement (p=0.88), absent reduction of LV end-diastolic volume (p=0.70), indexed LV mass (p=0.31), ESD (p=0.48) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (p=0.82), and an increase of basal RV diameter (p<0.001). Patients with moderate/severe PPM had worse NYHA functional class at 1 year (NYHA III-IV 13% vs 7.8%, p=0.03). Independent predictor of PPM at multivariable logistic regression was male gender (OR=1.93, p=0.04); while SVi (OR=0.86, p<0.001), prosthetic size >23mm (OR=0.62, p=0.03) and LVOT diameter (OR=0.79, p=0.02) had protective effect. Conclusions There was no evidence of a short- or medium-term impact of PPM on mortality. However, clinical-echocardiographic evaluations demonstrated a PPM-related pattern of early ventricular maladaptive alterations associated with a significant deterioration in NYHA class at 1 year.
Abstract Aims Permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a relevant issue, being more frequent than after surgery and the progressive shift towards low-risk patients stressed the importance to reduce the risk of complications that could impact patient’s long-term prognosis. Long-term right ventricular pacing has been related to an increased risk of electromechanical asynchrony, negative left-ventricular remodelling, atrial fibrillation and heart failure, but there is a lack of evidence regarding the prognostic impact on TAVI patients. The aim of this international multicentre study is to assess the impact of right ventricular pacing on prognosis of TAVI patients undergone pacemaker implantation after the procedure due to conduction disorders. Methods and results All the consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with TAVI and subsequently underwent pacemaker implantation in each participating centre were enrolled. Patients were divided into two subgroups according to the percentage of ventricular pacing (VP cut-off: 40%) at pacemaker interrogation. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for heart failure in subgroups based on the percentage of ventricular stimulation. All cause and cardiovascular mortality in the subgroups according to the percentage of ventricular pacing were the secondary endpoints. In total, 427 patients were enrolled, 153 patients with VP < 40% and 274 with a with VP ≥ 40%. Patients with VP ≥ 40% were older (81.16 ± 6.4 years vs. 80.51 ± 6.8 years), with higher NYHA class, a lower EF (55.26 ± 12.2 vs. 57.99 ± 11.3 P = 0.03), an increased end diastolic ventricular volume (112.11 ± 47.6 vs. 96.60 ± 40.4, P = 0.005) and diameter (48.89 ± 9.7 vs. 45.84 ± 7.5 P = 0.01). A higher incidence of moderate post-procedural paravalvular leak was observed in patients with VP ≥ 40% (37.5% vs. 26.85%, P = 0.03). Ventricular pacing ≥40% was associated with a higher incidence of the composite primary endpoint of CV mortality and HF hospitalization (p at log rank test = 0.006, adjusted HR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.03–5.6; P = 0.04). Patients with ventricular pacing ≥ 40% had also a higher risk of all-cause (p at log rank test = 0.03, adjusted HR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.03–2.38; P = 0.03) and cardiovascular (p at log ank test =0.008, adjusted HR: 3.77; CI: 1.32–10.78; P = 0.006) mortality compared to patients with a VP < 40%. Conclusions TAVI Patients underwent permanent pacemaker implantation after the procedure due to conduction disorders and with a VP ≥ 40% at follow-up are at increased risk of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalizations and of all-cause mortality compared to patients with a VP < 40%. It is mandatory to reduce the percentage of ventricular pacing at follow-up when possible or consider left ventricular branch pacing and biventricular pacing in TAVI patients.
