Background/Aims Several studies have demonstrated the effect of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) as a salvage treatment for patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the role of auto-HSCT as a frontline treatment has not been fully investigated in the rituximab era. We validated the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score for high-risk DLBCL patients and identified a possible role for frontline auto-HSCT. Methods We recommended frontline auto-HSCT for high-risk DLBCL patients who satisfied the criteria of both a higher Ann-Arbor stage (III to IV) and an elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level at diagnosis with an aaIPI score ⥠2. From 2006 to 2011, among the 150 DLBCL patients aged ⤠60 years who were treated with six cycles of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP), 23 high-risk patients with a complete response (CR) were treated with auto-HSCT. For comparison, we selected 35 well-matched high-risk patients with CR who completed R-CHOP treatment alone. In addition, there were 81 low-risk patients and 11 refractory patients. Results DLBCL patients with an aaIPI score ⥠2 showed inferior overall survival (OS; p = 0.040) and progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.007) compared to the aaIPI score 0 to 1. Between the two treatment arms among the high-risk DLBCL patients, the clinical parameters were not different. The high-risk group treated with frontline auto-HSCT showed similar OS (p = 0.392) and PFS (p = 0.670) to those in the low-risk group. Thus, frontline auto-HSCT showed superior PFS (p = 0.004), but only a trend towards favorable OS (p = 0.091) compared to R-CHOP alone. Conclusions We identified the possible role of frontline auto-HSCT for high-risk DLBCL with a higher stage (III to IV) and elevated LDH level.
Abstract Oral mucositis (OM) is a common complication in cancer patients undergoing anticancer treatment. Despite the clinical and economic consequences of OM, there are no drugs available for its fundamental control. Here, we show that high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), a “danger signal” that acts as a potent innate immune mediator, plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of OM. In addition, we investigated treatment of OM through HMGB1 blockade using NecroX-7 (tetrahydropyran-4-yl)-[2-phenyl-5-(1,1-dioxo-thiomorpholin-4-yl)methyl-1Hindole-7-yl]amine). NecroX-7 ameliorated basal-layer epithelial cell death and ulcer size in OM induced by chemotherapy or radiotherapy. This protective effect of NecroX-7 was mediated by inhibition of HMGB1 release and downregulation of mitochondrial oxidative stress. Additionally, NecroX-7 inhibited the HMGB1-induced release of TNF-α, IL-1β and MIP-1β, as well as the expression of p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) and the excessive inflammatory microenvironment, including nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) pathways. In conclusion, our findings suggest that HMGB1 plays a key role in the pathogenesis of OM; therefore, blockade of HMGB1 by NecroX-7 may be a novel therapeutic strategy for OM. Citation Format: Keon-Il Im, Young-Sun Nam, Nayoun Kim, YuneJin Song, Young-Woo Jeon, Jung-Yeon Lim, Seok-Goo Cho. Regulation of HMGB1 release protects chemoradiotherapy-associated mucositis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 465.
The choice of a primary treatment for ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (OAML) depends on the extent of tumor spread. However, radiotherapy is commonly used as a first-line therapy despite ophthalmic complications, because most OAMLs are in a limited stage of progression. However, the initial therapeutic modality, including chemotherapy and treatment of the advanced stage, has not been fully established for OAML. Therefore, we evaluated the optimal therapeutic options and survival outcome-related parameters for patients with primary OAML.We evaluated 208 consecutive patients with primary OAML who were diagnosed at the Catholic University Lymphoma Group between January 2004 and April 2015.During a median follow-up of 70.0 months (range, 3.2-182.0 months) in 208 patients with primary OAML, most patients were female and the median age was 46 years old. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 13 years were excellent (92.7% and 69.7%, respectively). Of the 117 patients who received the first-line radiotherapy, 92% achieved complete remission (CR), usually by being treated with less than 30 Gy. Radiation-related ophthalmic complications including dry eye syndrome (59%) and cataract (22%) caused a decline in the quality of life (QoL). Chemotherapy alone was used to treat 86 OAML patients, with 84.9% achieving CR and 12.8% achieving partial remission with tolerable toxicities. There were no differences in survival outcomes between patients treated with radiotherapy versus those treated with rituximab-containing chemotherapy, although the latter group had more advanced stages of OAML (OS, p = 0.057; PFS, p = 0.075).OAML patients were predominantly female and relatively young, and radiotherapy as a primary therapeutic option was more likely to lead to radiation-related complications, resulting in lower QoL. On the other hand, frontline chemotherapy showed consistent therapeutic outcomes with tolerable toxicities compared to radiotherapy, and there were no long-term or delayed adverse events. Therefore, when considering therapeutic efficacy and therapy-related QoL, chemotherapy is recommended for younger patients, and radiotherapy is recommended for older and chemotherapy-ineligible patients.A National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (No. NRF-2016R1A2B4007282).
Abstract Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment for peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs). Strategies that reduce the relapse rate and treatment-related mortality are essential for successful ASCT. Because in vivo/in vitro purging methods using rituximab are not appropriate for T-cell lymphomas, an ex vivo CD34+ selective purging system is the most reliable method to reduce autograft tumor cell contamination in these tumors. Methods: We retrospectively investigated the influence of ex vivo purging with CD34+ selection to maximize the effects of ASCT. Of 67 consecutive PTCL patients, 32 and 35 underwent purged and unpurged ASCT. Results: The purged group had improved overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.68, p = 0.016; HR = 3.97, p = 0.002; and HR = 3.65, p = 0.004, respectively), compared to the unpurged group. Prognostic factor analysis showed that unpurged ASCT, chromosomal abnormalities at initial diagnosis, high risk, and pre-ASCT disease status were associated with poor survival outcomes. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that purging was most appropriate for International Prognostic Index high-risk patients who underwent upfront ASCT (HR = 3.35 [OS] and = 6.59 [DFS]). In purged ASCT group, NK cell activity and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio known as an independent prognostic factor were increased after ASCT with statistical significance. Conclusions: There were no engraftment failures or differences in adverse events between the two groups. CD34+ ex vivo purging ASCT is safe, effective, and may improve survival outcomes, particularly in high-risk PTCL patients.
To explore the optimal mobilization for multiple myeloma (MM) patients, we conducted a prospective trial comparing single-dose etoposide (375 mg/m2 for one day) plus G-CSF versus G-CSF alone, followed by risk-adapted plerixafor. After randomization, 27 patients in the etoposide group and 29 patients in the G-CSF alone group received mobilizations. Six (22.2%) patients in the etoposide group and 15 (51.7%) patients in the G-CSF alone group received plerixafor based on a peripheral blood CD34+ cell count of < 15/mm3 (p = 0.045). The median count of CD34+ cells collected was significantly higher in the etoposide group (9.5 × 106/kg vs. 7.9 × 106/kg; p = 0.018), but the optimal collection rate (CD34+ cells ≥ 6 × 106/kg) was not significantly different between the two groups (96.3% vs. 82.8%; p = 0.195). The rate of CD34+ cells collected of ≥ 8.0 × 106/kg was significantly higher in the etoposide group (77.8% vs. 44.8%; p = 0.025). Although the rates of grade II-IV thrombocytopenia (63.0% vs. 31.0%; p = 0.031) and grade I-IV nausea (14.8% vs. 0%; p = 0.048) were significantly higher in the etoposide group, the rates of adverse events were low in both groups, with no neutropenic fever or septic shock. Thus, both single-dose etoposide plus G-CSF and G-CSF alone with risk-adapted plerixafor were effective and safe, but the former may be the better option for patients who are expected to receive two or more transplantations.
CT-P10 was the first licensed rituximab biosimilar. This Korean post-marketing surveillance study evaluated CT-P10 safety and effectiveness in approved indications.This prospective, open-label, observational, phase 4 study collected routine clinical practice data across 27 centers in the Republic of Korea. Patients received their first CT-P10 treatment, per prescribing information, for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) during the surveillance period (16 November 2016-15 November 2020). Safety (including adverse events [AEs] and adverse drug reactions [ADRs]) and disease-specific clinical response (by best overall response [NHL/CLL], Disease Activity Score in 28-joints [RA], or Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis [GPA/MPA]) were assessed for ≤1 year (NHL/CLL) or ≤24 weeks (RA/GPA/MPA).The safety population comprised 677 patients (604 NHL, 16 CLL, 42 RA, 7 GPA, 8 MPA). AEs/ADRs were reported for 68.4%/27.7% (NHL/CLL), 31.0%/14.3% (RA), and 86.7%/13.3% (GPA/MPA) of patients. Serious AEs and unexpected ADRs did not raise new safety signals. Pneumonia was the most frequent serious ADR overall. Positive effectiveness outcomes were observed.Findings were consistent with the known CT-P10/reference rituximab safety profile, with high effectiveness observed in NHL/CLL and RA.
Purpose We retrospectively determined the efficacy and safety of the combination of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer. Materials and Methods Between January 2006 and August 2009, 39 patients with histologically-confirmed, metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer underwent chemotherapy, and the results were retrospectively investigated. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) and FA (200 mg/m2; 2-hour infusion), then 5-FU (2,400 mg/m2; 46-hour continuous infusion) every 2 weeks. Results Thirty-nine patients received a total of 210 treatment cycles. The median number of cycles was 6 (range, 1 to 16). Of the 32 evaluable patients, zero patients achieved a complete response and 11 patients achieved a partial response (response rate, 28.2%). The median time-to-progression and overall survival were 4.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 6.5 months) and 9.8 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 16.0 months), respectively. The main hematologic toxicity was anemia, which was observed in 119 cycles (56.7%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 32 cycles (15.2%). The main non-hematologic toxicity was constipation, which was observed in 91 cycles (46.2%). Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 71 cycles (33.8%); all cases were grade 1 or 2. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusion This study showed that combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, 5-FU, and FA is an active and well-tolerated regimen as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer. Key words: Stomach neoplasms, Drug therapy, Oxaliplatin
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a long-term complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation associated with poor quality of life and increased morbidity and mortality. Currently, there are several approved treatments for patients who do not respond to steroids, such as ruxolitinib. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients fail second-line treatment, indicating the need for novel approaches. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been considered a potential treatment approach for steroid-refractory cGVHD. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeated infusions of MSCs, we administered intravenous MSCs every two weeks to ten patients with severe steroid-refractory cGVHD in a prospective phase I clinical trial. Each patient received a total of four doses, with each dose containing 1 × 106 cells/kg body weight from the same donor and same passage. Patients were assessed for their response to treatment using the 2014 National Institutes of Health (NIH) response criteria during each visit. Ten patients with diverse organ involvement were enrolled, collectively undergoing 40 infusions as planned. Remarkably, the MSC infusions were well tolerated without severe adverse events. Eight weeks after the initial MSC infusion, all ten patients showed partial responses characterized by the amelioration of clinical symptoms and enhancement of their quality of life. The overall response rate was 60%, with a complete response rate of 20% and a partial response (PR) rate of 40% at the last follow-up. Overall survival was 80%, with a median follow-up of 381 days. Two patients died due to relapse of their primary disease. Immunological analyses revealed a reduction in inflammatory markers, including Suppression of Tumorigenicity 2 (ST2), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL)10, and Secreted phosphoprotein 1(SPP1), following the MSC treatment. Repeated MSC infusions proved to be both feasible and safe, and they may be an effective salvage therapy in patients with steroid-refractory cGVHD. Further large-scale clinical studies with long-term follow-up are needed in the future to determine the role of MSCs in cGVHD.