In an effort to encourage Family Planning (FP) adoption, since 1952, the Government of India has been implementing various centrally sponsored schemes that offer financial incentives (FIs) to acceptors as well as service providers, for services related to certain FP methods. However, understanding of the role of FIs on uptake of FP services, and the quality of FP services provided, is limited and mixed.A qualitative descriptive study was conducted in Chatra and Palamu districts of Jharkhand state. A total of 64 interviews involving multiple stakeholders were conducted. The stakeholders included recent FP acceptors or clients, FP service providers of public health facilities including Accredited Social Healthcare Activists (ASHAs), government health officials managing FP programs at the district and state level, and members of development partners supporting FP programs in Jharkhand. Data analysis included both inductive and deductive strategies. It was done using the software Atlas ti version 8.It has emerged that there is a strong felt need for FP among majority of the clients, and FIs may be a motivator for uptake of FP methods only among those belonging to the lower socio economic strata. For ASHAs, FI is the primary motivator for providing FP related services. There may be a tendency among them and the nurses to promote methods which have more financial incentives linked with them. There are mixed opinions on discontinuing FIs for clients or replacing them with non-financial incentives. Delays in payment of FIs to both clients and the ASHAs is a common issue and adversely effects the program.FIs for clients have limited influence on their decision to take up a FP method while different amounts of FIs for ASHAs and nurses, linked with different FP methods, may be influencing their service provision. More research is needed to determine the effect of discontinuing FI for FP services.
Abstract Background: In an effort to encourage Family Planning (FP) adoption, since 1952, the Government of India has been implementing various centrally sponsored schemes that offer financial incentives (FIs) to acceptors as well as service providers, for services related to certain FP methods. However, understanding of the role of FIs on uptake of FP services, and the quality of FP services provided, is limited and mixed. Methods : A qualitative study was conducted in Chatra and Palamu districts of Jharkhand state. A total of 64 interviews involving multiple stakeholders were conducted. The stakeholders included recent FP acceptors or clients, FP service providers of public health facilities including community health activists (ASHAs), government health officials managing FP programs at the district and state level, and members of development partners supporting FP programs in Jharkhand. Data analysis included both inductive and deductive strategies. It was done using the software Atlas ti version 8. Results: It emerged that there is a strong felt need for family planning among majority clients, and FIs may be a motivator for uptake of FP methods only among those belonging to the lower socio economic strata. For ASHAs, FI is the primary motivator for providing FP related services. There may be a tendency among them and nurses to promote methods which have more financial incentives linked with them. There are mixed opinions on discontinuing FIs for clients or replacing them with non-financial incentives. Delays in payment of FIs to both clients and the ASHAs is a common issue and adversely effects the program. Conclusion : FIs for clients have limited influence on their decision to take up a FP method while different amounts of FIs for ASHAs and nurses, linked with different FP methods, may be influencing their service provision. More research is needed to determine the effect of discontinuing FP related FIs for clients.
tiple language errors were identified because the typesetter didn't implement these corrections during production.The changes have been highlighted with corrections and shown in Additional file 1.
'%3e%3ccircle r='20' fill='%23008'/%3e%3ccircle r='17.5' fill='%23fff'/%3e%3ccircle r='3.5' fill='%23008'/%3e%3cg id='d'%3e%3cg id='c'%3e%3cg id='b'%3e%3cg id='a' fill='%23008'%3e%3ccircle r='.875' transform='rotate(7.5 -8.75 133.5)'/%3e%3cpath d='M0 17.5.6 7 0 2l-.6 5L0 17.5z'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(15)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' transform='rotate(30)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23c' transform='rotate(60)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' transform='rotate(120)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' transform='rotate(-120)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='scale(-1 1)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' transform='rotate(72)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' transform='rotate(144)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' transform='rotate(216)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' transform='rotate(288)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/defs%3e%3cpath fill='%23ce1126' d='M0 0h500v300H0z'/%3e%3cpath fill='%23007a5e' d='M42 42h416v216H42z'/%3e%3cpath fill='%23fcd116' d='M42 42h416L42 258h416z'/%3e%3ccircle cx='250' cy='150' r='36' fill='%23ce1126'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23c' transform='matrix(33 0 0 33 250 150)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' x='-100'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23c' id='d' transform='matrix(19.5 0 0 19.5 250 21)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' x='100'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' x='-100' y='258'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' y='258'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' x='100' y='258'/%3e%3cpath fill='%23ce1126' d='M67.749 150.41c4.504 8.39 13.265 17.52 20.916 20.73.123-8.52-2.9-19.44-7.034-28.14l-13.882 7.41z'/%3e%3cpath fill='%23fcd116' d='M60.112 121.63c6.529 13.61-16.933 46.08 22.156 53.69-4.822-6.58-7.931-17.44-6.755-26.16 8.201 3.12 16.83 12.25 20.317 19.23 10.23-37.15-26.24-34.89-35.718-46.76z'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)