Starting in 2013, a five-year, competence-based postgraduate programme, the "Seminartage Weiterbildung Allgemeinmedizin" (SemiWAM®) for continuing education in general practice, was developed and offered in Bavaria. This evaluation reports on the experiences of SemiWAM® after a first cycle.Process reflection based on the cycle of Kern: In addition to qualitative findings, results of the evaluation forms (mean values with standard deviation) are presented. The evaluation form contained questions on organisational issues, content of presentation, didactic preparation of the supervisor, transfer to real life practice as well as demographic variables. All questions were voted on a six-point Likert scale from "1=very satisfied" to "6=very dissatisfied".The reflection showed three crucial entry points: Choosing "reason for encounter" as a content precondition to ensure target audience needs, the close didactic supervision of supervisor, and the continuous growth of supervisor team with newly qualified GP. The evaluation results for the overall assessment (MW 1.11-1.60), the didactic concept (MW 1.30-1.87), as well as the transfer into daily life practice (MW 1.48-2.35) reflect the high quality of the SemiWAM®.The SemiWAM® curriculum presented can be easily transferred to comparable structures in Germany that accompany specialty training, such as the competence centres for residency training in general practice. The process evaluation based on the core cycle also provides important support for the agile implementation of these or similar programmes.Beginnend im Jahr 2013 wurde in Bayern ein fünfjähriges, kompetenzbasiertes, weiterbildungsbegleitendes Seminarcurriclum, die „Seminartage Weiterbildung Allgemeinmedizin“ (SemiWAM®) für die Weiterbildung in der Allgemeinmedizin entwickelt und angeboten. Mit diesem Evaluationsbericht werden die Erfahrungen der SemiWAM® nach einem ersten Durchlaufen berichtet.Prozessreflexion auf Basis des Kern-Zyklus: Neben qualitativen Befunden werden Ergebnisse der Evaluation der Teilnehmenden (Mittelwerte mit Standardabweichung) dargestellt. Der Evaluationsbogen enthielt Fragen, u.a. zur Bewertung der Organisation, Inhalten und Art der Präsentation der Referierenden, der didaktischen Aufbereitung, des Transfers in die Weiterbildungspraxis sowie demographische Variablen. Alle Fragen wurden auf einer sechststufigen Likertskala von „1=sehr zufrieden“ bis „6=sehr unzufrieden“ abgestimmt.In der Prozessreflexion zeigten sich drei Stellschrauben als zielführend: Die Ausrichtung der Inhalte an Beratungsanlässen nah am Bedarf der Zielgruppe, die enge didaktische Supervision von Referierendenteams und die stetige Erweiterung des Referierendenteams durch junge Fachärztinnen und Fachärzte für Allgemeinmedizin. Die Evaluationsergebnisse für die Gesamtbewertung (MW 1,11-1,60), die didaktische Konzeption und Aufbereitung (MW 1,30-1,87) sowie den Transfer in die Weiterbildungspraxis (MW 1,48-2,35) spiegeln die hohe Qualität der SemiWAM®.Das vorgestellte Curriculum der SemiWAM® lässt sich zwanglos auf vergleichbare weiterbildungsbegleitende Strukturen in Deutschland wie die Kompetenzzentren Weiterbildung Allgemeinmedizin übertragen. Die Prozessevaluation auf Basis des Kern-Zyklus gibt zudem wichtige Hilfestellung in der agilen Umsetzung dieser oder ähnlicher Programme.
1. Callwood A, Jeevaratnam K, Kotronoulas G, Schneider A, Lewis L, Nadarajah VD. Personal domains assessed in multiple mini interviews (MMIs) for healthcare student selection: A narrative synthesis systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;64:56-64. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.016 CrossRef Google Scholar
Background: Infections are a leading cause of refugee morbidity. Recent data on the rate of airway infections and factors influencing their spread in refugee reception centers is scarce. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study of de-identified medical records with a focus on respiratory infections in underage refugees was conducted at two large German refugee reception centers. Results: In total, medical data from n = 10,431 refugees over an observational period of n = 819 days was analyzed. Among pediatric patients (n = 4289), 55.3% presented at least once to the on-site medical ward with an acute respiratory infection or signs thereof. In 38.4% of pediatric consultations, acute airway infections or signs thereof were present. Airway infections spiked during colder months and were significantly more prevalent amongst preschool and resettled children. Their frequency displayed a positive correlation with the number of refugees housed at the reception centers. Conclusions: We show that respiratory infections are a leading cause for morbidity in young refugees and that their rate is influenced age, season, status, and residential density. This illustrates the need to protect refugee children from contracting airway infections which may also reduce the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the current pandemic.
Background: Language barriers play a critical role in the treatment of migrant and refugee patients. In Germany, primary care interpreters are often not available especially in rural areas or if patients demand spontaneous or urgent consultations. Methods: In order to enable patients and their physicians to communicate effectively about the current illness history, we developed a digital communication assistance tool (DCAT) for 19 different languages and dialects. This paper reports the multidisciplinary process of the conceptual design and the iterative development of this cross-cultural user-centered application in an action-oriented approach. Results: We piloted our app with 36 refugee patients prior to a clinical study and used the results for further development. The acceptance and usability of the app by patients was high. Conclusion: Using digital tools for overcoming language barriers can be a feasible approach when providing health care to foreign-language patients.
Introduction Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) in women are common infections encountered in primary care. Evidence suggests that rapid point-of-care tests (POCTs) to detect bacteria and erythrocytes in urine at presentation may help primary care clinicians to identify women with uUTIs in whom antibiotics can be withheld without influencing clinical outcomes. This pilot study aims to provide preliminary evidence on whether a POCT informed management of uUTI in women can safely reduce antibiotic use. Methods and analysis This is an open-label two-arm parallel cluster-randomised controlled pilot trial. 20 general practices affiliated with the Bavarian Practice-Based Research Network (BayFoNet) in Germany were randomly assigned to deliver patient management based on POCTs or to provide usual care. POCTs consist of phase-contrast microscopy to detect bacteria and urinary dipsticks to detect erythrocytes in urine samples. In both arms, urine samples will be obtained at presentation for POCTs (intervention arm only) and microbiological analysis. Women will be followed-up for 28 days from enrolment using self-reported symptom diaries, telephone follow-up and a review of the electronic medical record. Primary outcomes are feasibility of patient enrolment and retention rates per site, which will be summarised by means and SDs, with corresponding confidence and prediction intervals. Secondary outcomes include antibiotic use for UTI at day 28, time to symptom resolution, symptom burden, number of recurrent and upper UTIs and re-consultations and diagnostic accuracy of POCTs versus urine culture as the reference standard. These outcomes will be explored at cluster-levels and individual-levels using descriptive statistics, two-sample hypothesis tests and mixed effects models or generalised estimation equations. Ethics and dissemination The University of Würzburg institutional review board approved MicUTI on 16 December 2022 (protocol n. 109/22-sc). Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences, reports addressed to clinicians and the local citizen’s forums. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05667207 .
Climate change is the greatest threat to human health. Medical students, as future health-care workers, are important in promoting sustainable behaviours, which are strongly associated with individuals' emotional responses to climate change. At Würzburg University Hospital (Würzburg, Germany), a one-term optional course (40 learning units) about planetary health and two lectures within the curricular course Environmental Medicine were introduced in 2021. We aimed to examine the effects of these courses on the emotions and motivations of students in acting against climate change.
Methods
We surveyed medical students from both courses during four consecutive terms during 2021–23 with a pre–post design using an anonymous online questionnaire on EvaSys. The survey consisted of 20 closed questions based on a 5-point Likert scale and six open questions. Quantitative data were analysed with SPSS version 28.0.1.1. Qualitative data were analysed with Kuckartz' qualitative content analysis.
Findings
458 students were initially involved (349 [76%] in the lectures and 109 [24%] in the optional course) and 396 students were involved until the final date (288 [73%] in the lectures and 108 [27%] in the optional course). Mean response rate was 389 (85%) of 458 students pre-survey and 315 (80%) of 396 post-survey. The most frequently reported initial emotions of medical students from both cohorts were "helplessness" (220 [57%] of 389), "fear" (197 [51%]), and "disappointment" (171 [44%]). Only 82 (21%) of 389 students reported having "motivation to act" and 45 (12%) reported having "confidence". When comparing 176 matched pre-lecture and post-lecture Likert scale values of reported emotions, we observed a significant decrease in "helplessness" (mean difference –0·37, 95% CI –0·2 to –0·53; p<0·0001; d=0·34) and "disappointment" (–0·35, –0·2 to –0·49; p<0·0001; d=0·36) and a significant increase in "confidence" (0·67, 0·82 to 0·51; p<0·0001; d=0·65 and "motivation to act" (0·4, 0·53 to 0·27; p<0·0001; d=0·46). Students associated these changes with options for action offered in the lecture.
Interpretation
This pre–post evaluation provides evidence for a positive effect of planetary health education at the university level. Educators should focus on options for action and create space for improving emotional resilience within courses.
Given the shortage and unequal distribution of physicians across specialties, we aimed to evaluate factors associated with medical students' career choices, including background, personality traits, educational experience, personal interests, lifestyle considerations, and the awareness of work requirements.
Since 2019, the competence center for specialist training in family medicine Bavaria (KWAB) offers an individual mentoring program to accompany specialist training in family medicine. The mentors are confidants for matters of specialist training, private practice, career development and compatibility of work and family life. The training takes place after registration via an online portal.The evaluation was conducted 24 months after the start of KWAB mentoring (06/30/2021-08/01/2021). All active participants were interviewed via online survey. In each case, separate questionnaires were developed, which inquire on the one hand about the content-related aspects of the mentoring, such as topics discussed, and on the other hand about the individual mentoring relationship, such as the interpersonal relationship. The mentees received 39 questions (34 closed, 5 open) and the mentors received 26 questions (21 closed, 5 open), which were subsequently analyzed using descriptive statistics.N = 30 mentors and N = 72 mentees were invited to participate in the evaluation (25 (83 %) mentors and 32 (44 %) mentees participated). More than half of the participants met each other at least twice. The main methods of communication were telephone, face-to-face meetings, and email contacts. The individual time commitment in each case was judged to be appropriate. According to the mentors, the mentees showed interest in the content of the program and demonstrated availability and commitment. All respondents indicated a high level of satisfaction with one-on-one mentoring and would recommend it to others.Mentors and mentees in family medicine residency reported a great benefit from the one-on-one mentoring offered and a will to continue their mentoring relationships even after the project period.
