To directly compare the expression patterns of different proteins known to be altered during mouse skin carcinogenesis, serial sections of normal and hyperplastic skin and tumors from various stages of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-initiated, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-promoted female SENCAR mice were examined by immunohistochemistry. In untreated, normal mouse skin, keratin 1 (K1) and transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGFbeta1) were strongly expressed in the suprabasal layers, whereas integrin alpha6beta4 was expressed only in basal cells and only moderate staining for transforming growth factor-alpha (TGFalpha) was seen. In hyperplastic skin, TGFalpha expression became stronger, whereas expression of another epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor ligand, heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF), was strongly induced in all epidermal layers from no expression in normal skin. Likewise, the gap-junctional protein connexin 26 (Cx26) became highly expressed in the differentiated granular layers of hyperplastic skin relative to undetectable expression in normal skin. Expression of cyclin D1 in the proliferative cell compartment was seen in all benign and malignant tumors but not in hyperplastic skin. Beginning with very early papillomas (after 10 wk of promotion), expression of alpha6beta4 in suprabasal cells and small, focal staining for keratin 13 (K13) were seen in some tumors. Later (after 20-30 wk), focal areas of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) activity appeared in a few papillomas, whereas TGFbeta1 expression began to decrease. Cx26 and TGFalpha staining became patchier in some late-stage papillomas (30-40 wk), whereas suprabasal alpha6beta4, K13, and GGT expression progressively increased and K1 expression decreased. Finally, in squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), there was an almost complete loss of K1 and a further decline in TGFalpha, HB-EGF, TGFbeta1, and Cx26 expression. On the other hand, almost all SCCs showed suprabasal staining for alpha6beta4 and widespread cyclin D1 and K13 expression, whereas only about half showed positive focal staining for GGT activity.
Previous studies have shown that all-trans-retinoic acid fails to inhibit chemically induced transformation in 10T1/2 cells except at toxic levels, whereas retinol and many synthetic retinoids are potent inhibitors. In contrast, in many systems retinoic acid is a more effective modulator of differentiation and carcinogenesis than is retinol. In any attempt to explain this anomaly, we have studied the differential metabolism of retinoic acid and retinol by 10T1/2 cells and by their initiated and transformed derivatives, and have also reexamined these cells for the presence of retinoid-binding proteins. Whereas retinoic acid was depleted from the medium bathing 10T1/2 and initiated 10T1/2 cells within 48 h of treatment, retinol was concentrated 500-fold by these cells, and disappeared from the culture medium no faster than from cell-free medium. Retinoic acid metabolism by a number of transformed cell lines varied widely. There was no apparent correlation between metabolizing ability and transforming agent (methylcholanthrene, X-rays, fission spectrum neutrons, and plasmid oncogene transfection). Uptake of retinoic acid was seen in all cell lines and was not correlated with its metabolism. Retinol was metabolized minimally by all cell lines tested; metabolism of retinol was not correlated with retinoic acid metabolizing ability. Retinoic acid-induced growth inhibition and cytotoxicity were not correlated with metabolizing ability, suggesting that the rate of metabolism of retinoic acid is not a major determinant of its acute biological effects. Using sensitive radioimmunoassays, cellular retinoic acid- (CRABP) and retino-binding proteins (CRBP) were both detected in 10T1/2 and initiated 10T1/2 cells. CRABP levels of about 16 ng/10(6) cells were about 4-fold higher than CRBP levels. Therefore, lack of CRABP does not explain the failure of retinoic acid to inhibit carcinogen-induced transformation in these cells. These studies suggest that the inability of retinoic acid to inhibit transformation in the 10T1/2 cell system may be due to its rapid metabolism and clearance from the medium. On the other hand, the high cellular uptake and stability of retinol in these cells could be an important factor in the inhibition of neoplastic transformation by this retinoid.