Abstract Background Quality assurance is acknowledged as a crucial factor in the assessment of oncological surgical care. The aim of this study was to develop a composite measure of multiple outcome parameters defined as ‘textbook outcome’, to assess quality of care for patients undergoing oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Methods Patients with oesophagogastric cancer, operated on with the intent of curative resection between 2011 and 2014, were identified from a national database (Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit). Textbook outcome was defined as the percentage of patients who underwent a complete tumour resection with at least 15 lymph nodes in the resected specimen and an uneventful postoperative course, without hospital readmission. Hospital variation in textbook outcome was analysed after adjustment for case-mix factors. Results In total, 2748 patients with oesophageal cancer and 1772 with gastric cancer were included in this study. A textbook outcome was achieved in 29·7 per cent of patients with oesophageal cancer and 32·1 per cent of those with gastric cancer. Adjusted textbook outcome rates varied from 8·5 to 52·4 per cent between hospitals. The outcome parameter ‘at least 15 lymph nodes examined’ had the greatest negative impact on a textbook outcome both for patients with oesophageal cancer and for those with gastric cancer. Conclusion Most patients did not achieve a textbook outcome and there was wide variation between hospitals.
The management of proximal esophageal cancer differs from that of tumors located in the mid and lower part of the esophagus due to the close vicinity of vital structures. Non-surgical treatment options like radiotherapy and definitive chemoradiation (CRT) have been implemented. The trends in (non-)surgical treatment and its impact on overall survival (OS) in patients with proximal esophageal cancer are unclear, related to its rare disease status. To optimize treatment strategies and counseling of patients with proximal esophageal cancer, it is therefore essential to gain more insight through real-life studies.To establish trends in treatment and OS in patients with proximal esophageal cancer.In this population-based study, patients with proximal esophageal cancer diagnosed between 1989 and 2014 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The proximal esophagus consists of the cervical esophagus and the upper thoracic section, extending to 24 cm from the incisors. Trends in radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery, and OS were assessed. Analyses were stratified by presence of distant metastasis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses was performed to assess the effect of period of diagnosis on OS, adjusted for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics.In total, 2783 patients were included. Over the study period, the use of radiotherapy, resection, and CRT in non-metastatic disease changed from 53%, 23%, and 1% in 1989-1994 to 21%, 9%, and 49% in 2010-2014, respectively. In metastatic disease, the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy increased over time. Median OS of the total population increased from 7.3 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.4-8.1] in 1989-1994 to 9.5 mo (95%CI: 8.1-10.8) in 2010-2014 (logrank P < 0.001). In non-metastatic disease, 5-year OS rates improved from 5% (95%CI: 3%-7%) in 1989-1994 to 13% (95%CI: 9%-17%) in 2010-2014 (logrank P < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated a significant treatment effect over time on survival. In metastatic disease, median OS was 3.8 mo (95%CI: 2.5-5.1) in 1989-1994, and 5.1 mo (95%CI: 4.3-5.9) in 2010-2014 (logrank P = 0.26).OS significantly improved in non-metastatic proximal esophageal cancer, likely to be associated with an increased use of CRT. Patterns in metastatic disease did not change significantly over time.
Abstract Aim To report the long term results of the CROSS trial with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy according to the Dutch randomised controlled ChemoRadiotherapy for Oesophageal cancer followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) has become standard of care for patients with cancer of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction. Methods Patients with locally advanced resectable squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction were randomised between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (five weekly cycles of intravenous carboplatin [AUC 2 mg/mL per min] and intravenous paclitaxel [50 mg/m² of body-surface area]) with concurrent 41.4 Gy radiotherapy given in 23 fractions of 1.8 Gy, 5 days per week) plus surgery versus surgery alone. Primary endpoint was overall survival, defined from date of randomisation to date of all-cause death or to last day of follow-up. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Results Between March 2004 and 2008, eight centres enrolled 368 patients. Some 178 were analysed in the chemoradiotherapy plus surgery group and 188 in the surgery alone group. After a median follow-up for surviving patients of 146.6 months (IQR 133.5-156.6), median overall survival was 49.0 months (95%CI 34.7-76.6) in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery group compared to 25.1 months (95%CI 19.1-39.4) in the surgery alone group, which was significantly different (HR 0.71 [95%CI 0.55-0.90]; log-rank p=0·005). Ten-year overall survival was 38% (95%CI 31%-45%) in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery group compared to 26% (95%CI 20%-33%) in the surgery alone group (HR 0.69 [95%CI 0.54-0.89]). For patients with squamous cell carcinoma ten-year overall survival was 46% (95%CI 33%-64%) in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery group compared to 23% (95%CI 13%-40%) in the surgery alone group. For patients with adenocarcinoma ten-year overall survival was 36% (95%CI 29%-45%) in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery group compared to 26% (95%CI 20%-35%) in the surgery alone group. Conclusion Survival benefit of patients with locally advanced resectable squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy persists for at least 10 years compared to patients undergoing surgery alone.
In 2011, the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) group began nationwide registration of all patients undergoing surgery with the intention of resection for oesophageal or gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to describe the initiation and implementation of this process along with an overview of the results.The DUCA is part of the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing. The audit provides (surgical) teams with reliable, weekly updated, benchmarked information on process and (case mix-adjusted) outcome measures. To accomplish this, a web-based registration was designed, based on a set of predefined quality measures.Between 2011 and 2014, a total of 2786 patients with oesophageal cancer and 1887 with gastric cancer were registered. Case ascertainment approached 100 per cent for patients registered in 2013. The percentage of patients with oesophageal cancer starting treatment within 5 weeks of diagnosis increased significantly over time from 32·5 per cent in 2011 to 41·0 per cent in 2014 (P < 0·001). The percentage of patients with a minimum of 15 examined lymph nodes in the resected specimen also increased significantly for both oesophageal cancer (from 50·3 per cent in 2011 to 73·0 per cent in 2014; P < 0·001) and gastric cancer (from 47·5 per cent in 2011 to 73·6 per cent in 2014; P < 0·001). Postoperative mortality remained stable (around 4·0 per cent) for patients with oesophageal cancer, and decreased for patients with gastric cancer (from 8·0 per cent in 2011 to 4·0 per cent in 2014; P = 0·031).Nationwide implementation of the DUCA has been successful. The results indicate a positive trend for various process and outcome measures.
Purpose or Objective: Short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy in five fractions) was recently shown in a multi-national randomized phase III clinical trial to be non-inferior to a commonly used regimen (40 Gy in 15 fractions) in elderly and/or frail patients with glioblastoma multiforme, with no difference in overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).This study compared the cost-effectiveness of the two regimens. Material and Methods:The direct unit costs of imaging, radiotherapy (RT), and dexamethasone were collected in equitable US dollars (USD) from the five primary contributing countries to the trial, representing 88% of all patients accrued (n = 86) between 2010 and 2013.Effectiveness was measured by the restricted mean overall survival (RMOS) and progression free survival (RMPFS).Irwin's restricted mean method was used to calculate mean survival time in the presence of censoring, and life-years gained and PFS gained.The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as: Cost per life-year gained = (Difference in direct costs between short-course RT and commonly used RT) ÷ (Difference in life-years gained between short-course RT and commonly used RT).Indirect costs were also estimated for comparison.Results: There was no OS difference between the two studied populations.The median OSs for the short-course and commonly used RTs were 8.2 (6.1-10.3)and 7.7 (5.5-9.9)months, respectively.Median PFSs were also not different.The differences in the RMOS and the ICER, however, were +0.11 life-years and -USD 3307 per life-year gained, respectively.The differences in the RMPFS and the ICER were +0.02 PFS and -USD 19030, respectively.The negative ICER values indicated improvement in direct cost in addition to life-years gained with the short-course RT.Indirect cost comparison also identified improved survival-to-treatment time ratio and reduced cost for patients and care-givers with short-course RT. Conclusion:The direct cost account for ICER of -USD 3307 per life-year gained and -USD 19030 per PFS gained indicates that the short-course RT is less costly and more effective compared to the commonly used RT.Indirect cost is also improved with the short-course RT.
Abstract Background Involved lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) have been associated with increased local recurrence (LR) and ipsi-lateral LR (LLR) rates. However, consensus regarding the indication and type of surgical treatment for suspicious LLNs is lacking. This study evaluated the surgical treatment of LLNs in an untrained setting at a national level. Methods Patients who underwent additional LLN surgery were selected from a national cross-sectional cohort study regarding patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery in 69 Dutch hospitals in 2016. LLN surgery consisted of either ‘node-picking’ (the removal of an individual LLN) or ‘partial regional node dissection’ (PRND; an incomplete resection of the LLN area). For all patients with primarily enlarged (≥7 mm) LLNs, those undergoing rectal surgery with an additional LLN procedure were compared to those undergoing only rectal resection. Results Out of 3057 patients, 64 underwent additional LLN surgery, with 4-year LR and LLR rates of 26% and 15%, respectively. Forty-eight patients (75%) had enlarged LLNs, with corresponding recurrence rates of 26% and 19%, respectively. Node-picking ( n = 40) resulted in a 20% 4-year LLR, and a 14% LLR after PRND ( n = 8; p = 0.677). Multivariable analysis of 158 patients with enlarged LLNs undergoing additional LLN surgery ( n = 48) or rectal resection alone ( n = 110) showed no significant association of LLN surgery with 4-year LR or LLR, but suggested higher recurrence risks after LLN surgery (LR: hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7–3.2, p = 0.264; LLR: HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.2–2.5, p = 0.874). Conclusion Evaluation of Dutch practice in 2016 revealed that approximately one-third of patients with primarily enlarged LLNs underwent surgical treatment, mostly consisting of node-picking. Recurrence rates were not significantly affected by LLN surgery, but did suggest worse outcomes. Outcomes of LLN surgery after adequate training requires further research.
Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy was routinely applied for nonlocally advanced rectal cancer (cT1-3N0-1M0 with >1 mm distance to the mesorectal fascia) in the Netherlands following the Dutch total mesorectal excision trial. This policy has shifted toward selective application after guideline revision in 2014.
The role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of patients with esophageal or esophagogastric-junction cancer is not well established. We compared chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery with surgery alone in this patient population.
