The optimal treatment sequence of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. Therefore, sequential systemic therapy after first-line therapy with sorafenib or lenvatinib was compared in a retrospective real-world cohort. In total, 164 patients with HCC were included. Child B cirrhosis was present in 26 patients (16.5%), whereas 132 patients (83.5%) had preserved liver function. In total, 72 patients (44%) discontinued systemic therapy after first-line therapy while 51 (31%) and 31 (19%) patients received 2 or more treatment lines. Most notably, median overall survival (mOS) was influenced by liver functional status and patient performance status at the beginning of first-line therapy. Patients receiving a sequential therapy regimen had significantly longer mOS compared to patients that discontinued systemic therapy after omitting first-line treatment. The choice of the initial TKI did not impact mOS. A clear deterioration of liver function could be observed during the course of TKI-based treatment.
Hintergrund & Ziele Die Zulassung von Immuncheckpoint-Inhibitoren (ICI) hat die Therapielandschaft beim fortgeschrittenen Hepatozellulären Karzinoms (HCC) nachhaltig verändert. Es häufen sich jedoch Hinweise, dass die antitumorale Wirkung der ICI bei soliden Tumoren durch die Applikation von Antibiotika negativ beeinflusst werden kann, wobei eine Veränderung des intestinalen Mikrobioms als ursächlich angesehen wird. Dabei scheint auch der Zeitpunkt einer etwaigen antiinfektiven Therapie eine Rolle zu spielen. Ziel dieser Studie war die retrospektive Auswertung des Outcomes von HCC-Patienten in Abhängigkeit von ihrer Co-Medikation, welche das Mikrobiom verändert.
Introduction: Immunomodulating effects of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) have been shown to inhibit antitumor immunity. Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies is common among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to assess the effect of H. pylori on the outcomes of ICI in patients with HCC. Methods: We conducted a multicenter study in patients with HCC across a broad range of treatments. Patients received either ICI-based combination regimens or sorafenib-based therapy. H. pylori serostatus and virulence factors were determined and correlated with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety across the treatment modalities. Results: 180 patients with HCC were included; among these, 64 were treated with ICI-based regimen and 116 with sorafenib-based regimen. In patients treated with ICI, median OS was shorter in H. pylori-positive patients (10.9 months in H. pylori-positive vs. 18.3 months; p = 0.0384). H. pylori positivity was associated with a shorter PFS in ICI recipients (3.9 months vs. 6.8 months, p = 0.0499). In patients treated with sorafenib, median OS was not shorter among H. pylori-positive patients (13.4 months in H. pylori-positive vs. 10.6 months; p = 0.3353). Immune-related adverse events and rates of gastrointestinal bleeding were comparable between H. pylori-positive and -negative patients. Conclusion: H. pylori seropositivity was linked to poorer outcomes in patients with HCC treated with ICI. This association was not observed among patients receiving sorafenib-based therapies.
Introduction: Septic shock is associated with high mortality and hemodynamic impairment. The use of corticoids is a common therapeutic tool in critically ill patients. However, data on the mechanisms and prognostic ability of hemodynamic improvement by adjunctive steroids are rare. This study primarily aimed to evaluate short-term effects of hydrocortisone therapy on catecholamine requirement and hemodynamics derived from transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) in 30 critically ill patients with septic shock and a 28 days mortality rate of 50%. Methods: Hydrocortisone was administered with an intravenous bolus of 200 mg, followed by a continuous infusion of 200 mg per 24 h. Hemodynamic assessment was performed immediately before as well as 2, 8, 16, and 24 h after the initiation of corticoids. For primary endpoint analysis, we evaluated the impact of hydrocortisone on vasopressor dependency index (VDI) and cardiac power index (CPI). Results: Adjunctive hydrocortisone induced significant decreases of VDI from 0.41 (0.29-0.49) mmHg-1 at baseline to 0.35 (0.25-0.46) after 2 h (P < .001), 0.24 (0.12-0.35) after 8 h (P < .001), 0.18 (0.09-0.24) after 16 h (P < .001) and 0.11 (0.06-0.20) mmHg-1 after 24 h (P < .001). In parallel, we found an improvement in CPI from 0.63 (0.50-0.83) W/m2 at baseline to 0.68 (0.54-0.85) after 2 h (P = .208), 0.71 (0.60-0.90) after 8 h (P = .033), 0.82 (0.6-0.98) after 16 h (P = .004) and 0.90 (0.67-1.07) W/m2 after 24 h (P < .001). Our analyses revealed a significant reduction in noradrenaline requirement in parallel with a moderate increase in mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance index, and cardiac index. As a secondary endpoint, our results showed a significant decrease in lung water parameters. Moreover, changes in CPI (ΔCPI) and VDI (ΔVDI) after 24 h of hydrocortisone therapy revealed accurate prognostic ability to predict 28 days mortality (AUC = 0.802 vs 0.769). Conclusion: Adjunctive hydrocortisone leads to a rapid decrease in catecholamine requirement and a substantial circulatory improvement in critically ill patients with septic shock.
Background: Immunotherapy-based combinations are currently the standard of care in the systemic treatment of patients with HCC. Recent studies have reported unexpectedly long survival with lenvatinib (LEN), supporting its use in first-line treatment for HCC. This study aims to compare the real-world effectiveness of LEN to atezolizumab/bevacizumab (AZ/BV). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of frontline AZ/BV or LEN therapy in patients with advanced HCC across 18 university hospitals in Europe. Results: The study included 412 patients (AZ/BV: n=207; LEN: n=205). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 treatment groups. However, patients treated with AZ/BV had a significantly longer median progression-free survival compared to those receiving LEN. The risk of hepatic decompensation was significantly higher in patients with impaired baseline liver function (albumin-bilirubin [ALBI] grade 2) treated with AZ/BV compared to those with preserved liver function. Patients with alcohol-associated liver disease had poorer baseline liver function compared to other etiologies and exhibited a worse outcome under AZ/BV. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, survival rates were similar between patients treated with LEN and those treated with AZ/BV, confirming that both are viable first-line options for HCC. The increased risk of hepatic decompensation in patients treated with AZ/BV who have impaired baseline liver function underscores the need for careful monitoring. Future trials should aim to distinguish more clearly between metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease and alcohol-associated liver disease.
Ziel/Aim Personalized dosimetry holds promise to improve radioembolization treatment outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. To this end, tolerance doses for healthy liver tissue (HLT) are assessed by calculating the mean whole-liver normal tissue dose (WLNT), which neglects non-uniform dose distribution. Thus, we analyzed whether voxel-based dosimetry could be more accurate in predicting hepatotoxicity in HCC patients undergoing radioembolization.
