In patients with metastatic, stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) does chemotherapy improve survival and quality of life?To make recommendations about the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC.Survival and quality of life are the primary endpoints of interest. Specifically, 1-year survival will be considered.Evidence was selected and reviewed by 3 medical oncologists and the project coordinator of the Ontario Cancer Treatment Practice Guidelines Initiative. Drafts of this document have been circulated and reviewed by the Provincial Lung Disease Site Group (Lung DSG). The Lung DSG comprises medical and radiation oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, a psychologists and a medical sociologist. There was no consumer participation in the development of this guideline.There were 3 meta-analyses available for review, but only 1 is discussed in detail. The largest and most comprehensive meta-analysis is based on 11 randomized controlled trials involving 1190 patients. The main comparisons were chemotherapy plus supportive care versus supportive care alone. The largest trial included in the meta-analysis involved randomization of 188 patients, and the smallest trial involved randomization of 32 patients. Only trials that had accrued patients between Jan. 1, 1965, and Dec. 31, 1991, were included in the analysis.A survival benefit at 1 year was seen for the group of patients treated with chemotherapy (pooled hazard ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.95). Subgroup analyses suggested a benefit for patients receiving chemotherapy regimens containing cisplatin (pooled hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.85; relative risk reduction for death, 27%; absolute improvement in 1 year survival, 10%; 95% CI, 5% to 18%; gain in median survival 1.5 months; 95% CI, 1 to 2.5 months). No benefit for patients treated with chemotherapy was found beyond 1 year. None of the randomized trials successfully measured quality of life using QOL assessment instruments. No firm conclusions can be made about the potential benefits (as measured by quality of life) that chemotherapy has for patients with metastatic NSCLC, as there are no available data from randomized controlled trials. However, several trials have documented relief of cancer-related symptoms, such as pain, cough, hemoptysis or dyspnea in the majority (approximately 70%) of patients.In a subgroup analysis of trials that used long-term alkylating agents other than cisplatin (an approach no longer used as therapy in NSCLC) as part of the chemotherapy regimen, the meta-analysis demonstrated a detrimental effect of chemotherapy on survival (pooled hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.66, p = 0.09). In general, myelosuppression, sepsis resulting in hospitalization, drug-specific toxicities and death are potential complications of chemotherapy.
Should preoperative (neoadjuvant) cisplatin-based chemotherapy with or without postoperative radiotherapy be offered to patients with technically resectable stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to improve survival? (Resectability should be determined preoperatively by a thoracic surgeon.)To make recommendations about the use of preoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy with or without postoperative radiotherapy in technically resectable stage IIIA NSCLC.Survival is the primary outcome of interest. PERSPECTIVES (VALUES): Evidence was collected and reviewed by 4 members of the Lung Cancer Disease Site Group (LCDSG) of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. The evidence was then presented to the full LCDSG and discussed extensively at 5 of its meetings. The LCDSG comprises medical and radiation oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, a psychologist and a medical sociologist. A community representative was present at one meeting during which the recommendation was discussed.Four small randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were available for review; 2 were completed and were reported in full in the literature, 1 was published in abstract form, and 1 was closed and was reported as an interim analysis. Although the RCTs used appropriate clinical trials methodology, including planned interim analyses and early stopping rules, retrospective review revealed inconsistencies between the treatment arms for subsets of stage IIIA disease and for prognostic factors. These factors and the small samples in each study limit the interpretation of the results.The data from 2 of the 4 trials were not combined because the data were not mature in one case and not extractable in the other. The 2 fully published, completed trials reported a survival benefit for patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy with or without postoperative radiotherapy compared with those not given preoperative chemotherapy. One trial reported a median survival of 26 months in the treatment group versus 8 months in the control group (p < 0.001). A second trial reported an estimated median survival of 64 months versus 11 months (p < 0.008) and a 3-year survival rate of 56% versus 15% respectively. A pooled analysis of the 2-year survival data from the 2 completed RCTs yielded an odds ratio for death of 0.18 (95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.51) in favour of preoperative chemotherapy.There was no difference in the postoperative mortality between the trials reviewed. Toxic effects associated with the chemotherapy were limited primarily to neutropenic fever, nausea and vomiting.
Is there a role for the use of gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)?To make recommendations about the use of gemcitabine in the management of medically appropriate patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC.The outcomes of interest were survival, response rate, symptomatic response, response duration and toxicity.Evidence was selected and reviewed by 2 members of the Provincial Lung Cancer Disease Site Group (DSG) of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. The practice guideline report was reviewed by the Provincial Lung Cancer DSG and by the Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group. These committees comprise medical and radiation oncologists, surgeons, pathologists, nurses, a psychologist, a medical sociologist and administrators. One community representative participated in the development of this practice guideline.Five phase II studies of single-agent gemcitabine in advanced NSCLC were reviewed. Four of these are published as full reports. Two randomized phase II studies comparing single-agent gemcitabine with etoposide plus cisplatin were also reviewed. One of these studies is fully published. Seven phase II studies of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin and I phase II study of gemcitabine in combination with ifosfamide were reviewed. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 randomized phase II study, published in abstract form, compared gemcitabine combination chemotherapy with cisplatin combination chemotherapy. An additional phase II study, published in abstract form, of gemcitabine as salvage therapy in previously treated patients was also included.Four phase II studies of single-agent gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 or more showed a combined response rate of 19% (intention-to-treat analysis; 95% confidence interval [CI] 15% to 24%) or 21% (efficacy analysis; 95% CI 17% to 26%) in advanced NSCLC. Median survival ranged from 7 to 9 months. Improvement from baseline in cough, hemoptysis and dyspnea was comparable to what would be expected with radiation therapy and with standard combination chemotherapy regimens. Improvement from baseline in their performance status was reported in 52% of treated patients. The 2 randomized phase II studies reported equivalent response rates for gemcitabine compared with etoposide plus cisplatin; the response data were pooled, which resulted in a nonsignificant benefit for gemcitabine (common odds ratio [OR] 0.90; 95% CI 0.43 to 1.90; p = 0.78). Gemcitabine has most frequently been combined with cisplatin, yielding a combined response rate of 44% (intention-to-treat; 95% CI 36% to 47%) or 45% (efficacy; 95% CI 39% to 51%) from 7 phase II studies. Median survival times ranged from 10 to 14 months. One phase II randomized study compared gemcitabine-cisplatin-vinorelbine vs. cisplatin-epirubicin-vindesine plus lonidamine and demonstrated a higher response rate (62% vs. 35%) in favour of the gemcitabine combination. Three RCTs demonstrated increased response rates for the combination of gemcitabine-cisplatin over either cisplatin alone or other combination regimens [(gemcitabine-cisplatin 35% vs. etoposide-cisplatin 12%; p = 0.001), (gemcitabine-cisplatin 31% vs. cisplatin 9%; p = 0.0001), (gemcitabine-cisplatin 40% vs. mitomycin, ifosfamide, cisplatin 28%; p = 0.03)].The major dose-limiting toxicity is neutropenia. Despite this, infection rates are low. Significant adverse effects that have an impact on the patient's quality of life or require the discontinuance of treatment are reported to be less than with any other single agent or combination of agents. Grade 3 or 4 dyspnea has been reported to occur in fewer than 2% of cases and may be drug related. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
1) What is the role of different schedules or doses of radiotherapy in patients with unresected, clinical or pathological, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? 2) Does chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy provide improved survival compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with unresected NSCLC?To make recommendations about the role of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of unresected stage III NSCLC.Survival is the primary outcome of interest. Quality of life is a secondary outcome.Evidence was selected and reviewed by 5 members of the Provincial Lung Cancer Disease Site Group (Lung DSG) of the Ontario Cancer Treatment Practice Guidelines Initiative. The Lung DSG comprises medical and radiation oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, a psychologist and a medical sociologist. No community representative participated in the development of this guideline.Two meta-analyses were available for review. The specific analysis of interest examined the role of combined chemotherapy plus radiotherapy v. radiotherapy alone in locally advanced disease. The first meta-analysis included combined data from 22 randomized controlled (RCTs) involving a total of 3033 patients. The second included combined data from 14 RCTs involving a total of 2589 patients. Also reviewed were 4 RCTs of radiotherapy alone, 1 trial of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy that was not included in the meta-analysis, 4 abstracts of studies of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and 4 trials examining the role of hyperfractionated radiotherapy.In the first meta-analysis, an overall benefit was detected at 2 years for the use of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. A hazard ratio of 0.90 (p = 0.006), or a 10% reduction in the risk of death, translated into an absolute benefit of 3% at 2 years and 2% at 5 years. A subgroup analysis of cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone demonstrated a 13% reduction in the risk of death in the combined treatment arm (pooled hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.96), for an absolute benefit of 4% at 2 years. In the second meta-analysis, there was a 13% reduction in the risk of death in the combined therapy arm at 2 years (pooled relative risk [RR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.94) and a 17% reduction at 3 years (pooled RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.90). Subgroup analysis of cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone showed similar results: a 15% reduction in the risk of death in the combined therapy arm at 2 years (pooled RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.92) and a 19% reduction at 3 years (pooled RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88).For patients with unresected stage III NSCLC, the combination of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radical radiotherapy provides a survival benefit compared with radiotherapy alone. This guideline is based on high-quality evidence from 2 meta-analyses of RCTs. Patients with good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0-1) and minimal weight loss (less than 5% in the preceding 3 months) have been shown to have a survival benefit from treatment with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy and should be considered for this type of treatment approach (see section V). For these patients, thoracic irradiation of 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks, in combination with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, should be recommended as a treatment option. The patient and physician should discuss fully the benefits, limitations and toxic effects of therapy. Patients not meeting these criteria are not candidates for combined therapy; those experiencing symptoms amenable to treatment should receive palliative thoracic irradiation. At this time, hyperfractionated radiotherapy is not recommended outside of the context of a clinical trial. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
The primary objective was to identify the lessons learned and issues addressed by the Disease Site Group (DSG) developing guidelines on lung cancer for practitioners in the province of Ontario.The minutes of the Ontario Lung Cancer Disease Site Group (LCDSG) and the meeting notes of a medical sociologist who attended all LCDSG meetings were reviewed to identify the disease-specific and generic issues addressed by the LCDSG during guideline development.The Ontario LCDSG has completed three practice guidelines and has five evidence-based recommendations (EBRs) in production. Topics for guideline development were selected on the basis of known practice variability (eg, advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC]); the size of the patient population that could potentially be affected by the guideline; results of phase II trials of new and potentially expensive agents (vinorelbine, paclitaxel, and docetaxel); and randomized controlled clinical trials that support new practice standards (combined modality therapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC). The wording of each EBR reflects the strength and quality of the evidence in support of the treatment option, the primary outcome(s), and the individual physician and discipline values concerning treatment outcomes in the absence of known patient values.
1) Does the use of postoperative, adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy, alone or in combination, improve survival rates among patients with completely resected, pathologically confirmed stage II or IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? 2) Does the use of radiotherapy reduce the risk of local recurrence among patients with completely resected stage II or IIIA NSCLC?To make recommendations about the use of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with completely resected stage II or IIIA NSCLC.Overall survival and disease-free survival are the primary outcomes of interest. A secondary outcome of interest is local disease control. PERSPECTIVES (VALUES): Evidence was collected and reviewed by 4 members of the Lung Cancer Disease Site Group (Lung Cancer DSG) of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. The evidence-based recommendation resulting from this review was approved by the Lung Cancer DSG, which comprises medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists, surgeons and a medical sociologist. A community representative was present at 1 meeting during which the recommendation was discussed.One meta-analysis and 22 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were published between 1962 and 1996. The RCTs compared surgery plus radiotherapy with surgery alone; surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone; surgery plus radiotherapy with surgery plus both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Many studies included patients with stage IIIB NSCLC; some included patients with incompletely resected stage I NSCLC or with small cell lung cancer (maximum 10%). Older studies used chemotherapy or radiation that would now be considered inferior according to current standards of practice.There was no survival benefit with adjuvant radiotherapy alone, although 3 RCTs reported a reduction in the rate of local recurrence among patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. The meta-analysis showed that postoperative, cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone reduced the relative risk of death by 13% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74 to 1.02); in combination with radiotherapy it resulted in a 6% reduction in the relative risk of death (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.11).Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with alkylating agents was found in the meta-analysis to increase the relative risk of death by 15%. A study involving prolonged adjuvant chemotherapy (busulfan or cytoxan daily for 2 years) reported that 4 of 726 patients had hematologic malignancies. In 1 study, only 53% of patients received all 4 cycles of chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-cisplatin (CAP); in another, 22% of patients refused therapy with CAP because of nausea and vomiting.There is evidence from RCTs that postoperative radiotherapy reduces rates of local recurrence by 11% to 18% (or 1.6 to 19-fold) among patients with completely resected, pathologically confirmed stage II or IIIA NSCLC. Therefore, if the outcome of interest is a reduction in the frequency of local tumour recurrence, radiotherapy is recommended. However, there is no evidence of a survival benefit from postoperative radiotherapy alone. In a meta-analysis, postoperative chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy resulted in a slightly reduced (statistically nonsignificant) risk of death among patients with surgically resected stage II or IIIA NSCLC. The survival benefit was small and achieved only with chemotherapy regimens that produced substantial toxic effects and that are no longer used. Newer chemotherapy regimens are currently being evaluated as adjuvant therapy, but there is insufficient evidence of benefit at this time to recommend them. Therefore, if the outcome of interest is survival, there is insufficient evidence to recommend current chemotherapy regimens with or without radiotherapy as postoperative, adjuvant the
