Immunotherapy targeting the autoimmune process in type 1 diabetes (T1D) can delay the loss of β-cells but needs to have minimal adverse effects to be an adjunct to insulin in the management of T1D. Ustekinumab binds to the shared p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23, targeting development of T helper 1 cells and T helper 17 cells (T
Background: Islet autoantibody screening for type 1 diabetes (T1D) reduces life-threatening diabetic ketoacidosis, hospitalization and identifies individuals eligible for future preventative treatments. 3.5-4 years has been indicated as an optimal time to screen younger children for T1D at a single-time point. We therefore assessed the feasibility and acceptability of screening at this age, to align with the pre-school vaccination visit, in a first of its kind, proof-of-concept study in the UK. Methods: Children attending routine pre-school vaccinations (n= 63; median age 3.5y (IQR 3.4-3.6, range 3.1-5.1y), 26 (41.3%) male) provided capillary blood samples which were posted for IAA, GADA, IA-2A and ZnT8A analysis. Serum volumes >60µL were tested using Radiobinding assay (RBA), and <60µL by Luciferase Immunoprecipitation Systems (LIPS) assay. Acceptability was assessed using open question postcards, and semi structured interviews. Results: There was 97% (61/63 samples) success in sample analysis, with median serum collected 100µL (IQR 80-155) and 83% (52/63)>60µL. One participant screened and confirmed positive by RBA for IAA. Participants (n=15 interviews, n=31 postcards) were uniformly positive about screening aligning to the vaccination programme, citing that they may have been less likely to take part had screening been a separate visit. Themes identified included being prepared in the event of a T1D diagnosis, feeling reassured by a negative test result, and the long-term benefit of screening outweighing short-term upset. Parents reported that the volume of blood was higher, and collection time longer than expected. Conclusions: Capillary islet autoantibody testing is a feasible and acceptable method to screen children for T1D. Aligning sample collection to the pre-school vaccination was not a deterrent to vaccination. The approach of combining screening with a routine health visit may enable uptake and could be cost saving. Disclosure C. Scudder: None. J. Townson: None. R. Besser: Consultant; Provention Bio, Inc. J. Bowen-morris: None. P. H. Evans: None. S. C. Jones: None. N. P. B. Thomas: None. R. Fox: None. J. Todd: Advisory Panel; GlaxoSmithKline plc., Precion, Qlife, Vesalius Therapeutics. S. Greenfield: None. C. Dayan: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Consultant; Provention Bio, Sanofi, Avotres Inc., Other Relationship; Dompé, Merck & Co., Inc. Funding National Institute for Health Research (203948)
To assess the persistence of serumHaemophilus influenzae type b antibodies and the prevalence of H influenzae type b carriage in a group of preschool age children previously vaccinated in infancy.
DESIGN
Names were randomly selected from immunisation records. Families were visited on five occasions over a period of 12 months and throat swabs were taken from all family members present, with blood obtained from children at the first and last visits.
RESULTS
One hundred and fifty three children at a median age of 3.6 years had a geometric mean titre (GMT) of 1.06 μg/ml (95% CI 0.80 to 1.38). Eight per cent had an undetectable antibody concentration, received a booster dose of plain PRP vaccine, and responded with concentrations > 2 μg/ml. GMT at 4.5 years of age was 0.89 μg/ml (0.69 to 1.16). Twelve children who had been exposed to H influenzae had a GMT of 4.7 v0.8 μg/ml for those without exposure.
CONCLUSIONS
Accelerated immunisation againstH influenzae without a second year booster results in persistence of satisfactory serum concentrations of antibody to 4.5 years of age. In those with undetectable antibody, immunological memory may still be present.
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) screening programmes testing islet autoantibodies (IAbs) in childhood can reduce life-threatening diabetic ketoacidosis. General population screening is required to detect the majority of children with T1D, since in >85% there is no family history. Age 3-5 years has been proposed as an optimal age for a single screen approach.
Background Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease affecting over 400,000 children and adults in the United Kingdom for which currently the only available therapy is insulin. Objective(s) To determine the efficacy and safety of the monoclonal antibody ustekinumab targeting the interleukin 12/interleukin 23 immune pathway that generates T helper 1/T helper 17 T cells to slow down the autoimmune process and preserve beta cell production in type 1 diabetes. Design Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase II trial. Setting Paediatric and young adult diabetes clinics across 16 sites in the United Kingdom. Participants Newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes and aged 12–18 years. Eligibility criteria Type 1 diabetes confirmed by islet autoantibody testing, within 100 days of first insulin injection, and with residual beta cell function (stimulated C-peptide level > 0.2 nmol/l). Interventions Ustekinumab at the highest approved doses or control (saline) subcutaneously at weeks 0, 4 and 12 and subsequently every 8 weeks to week 44 (seven doses). Main outcome measures Preservation of Mixed Meal Tolerance Test stimulated 2-hour insulin C-peptide area under the curve at week 52 as compared to control (saline) treatment by analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline parameters. Randomisation 2 : 1 Remote computerised randomisation with minimisation by age and baseline C-peptide groups. Blinding Blinding of participants, investigators, laboratory and trial staff. Numbers randomised Seventy-two participants were randomised, 60% male, 18% aged 16–18 years. Recruitment Two hundred and eight potentially eligible patients were approached, and 88 patients were screened. Four participants were lost to follow-up (6%). Four participants withdrew from the treatment but attended the primary end-point assessment. Numbers analysed Six participants were missing baseline data for the primary analysis. The final analysable sample was n = 62. Outcome Ustekinumab was associated with a 49% higher endogenous stimulated insulin production than control at week 52 after adjustments for baseline factors [geometric ratio of ustekinumab to control was 1.49 (95% confidence interval 1.08 to 2.06; p = 0.02)]. Secondary analyses showed no difference in C-peptide at week 28 suggesting that the effect was ‘late’ or ‘delayed’. Ancillary analysis showed a significant reduction in activated T helper 17.1 T cells ( p < 0.001) in the treatment group which was associated with C-peptide preservation from week 28 to week 52. Harms No severe adverse events were reported and there were no differences between ustekinumab and control groups in the proportion of participants overall experiencing mild (87% vs. 88%) or moderate (32% vs. 32%) events. Limitations Sensitivity analysis showed the primary end point to be robust to exclusion of small numbers of participants with some protocol deviations and extreme values in key covariates, but not to imputation of all missing data. Conclusions Ustekinumab appears to slow down the autoimmune process providing the first clinical trial evidence that interleukin 17-secreting T cells play a pathogenic role in type 1 diabetes. Alone, it is insufficient to halt the autoimmune process. Future work Replication of this result is ongoing in a trial with a similar design in Canada. If confirmed, consideration may be given to testing other drugs targeting the interleukin 17 pathway, using ustekinumab in combination with other agents or using it earlier in the disease pathway (preclinical disease) since it is so well tolerated and simple to use. Study registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN14274380. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) programme (NIHR award ref: 16/36/01) and is published in full in Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation ; Vol. 12, No. 1. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Introduction Most individuals newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have 10%–20% of beta-cell function remaining at the time of diagnosis. Preservation of residual beta-cell function at diagnosis may improve glycaemic control and reduce longer-term complications. Immunotherapy has the potential to preserve endogenous beta-cell function and thereby improve metabolic control even in poorly compliant individuals. We propose to test ustekinumab (STELARA), a targeted and well-tolerated therapy that may halt T-cell and cytokine-mediated destruction of beta-cells in the pancreas at the time of diagnosis. Methods and analysis This is a double-blind phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of ustekinumab in 72 children and adolescents aged 12–18 with new-onset T1D. Participants should have evidence of residual functioning beta-cells (serum C-peptide level >0.2nmol/L in the mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) and be positive for at least one islet autoantibody (GAD, IA-2, ZnT8) to be eligible. Participants will be given ustekinumab/placebo subcutaneously at weeks 0, 4 and 12, 20, 28, 36 and 44 in a dose depending on the body weight and will be followed for 12 months after dose 1. MMTTs will be used to measure the efficacy of ustekinumab for preserving C-peptide area under the curve at week 52 compared with placebo. Secondary objectives include further investigations into the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, patient and parent questionnaires, alternative methods for measuring insulin production and exploratory mechanistic work. Ethics and dissemination This trial received research ethics approval from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 3 in September 2018 and began recruiting in December 2018. The results will be disseminated using highly accessed, peer-reviewed medical journals and presented at conferences. Trial registration number ISRCTN14274380 .
Background: Protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccines against Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C were introduced into the U.K. routine immunization schedule in 1999. This study is the first to describe both persistence of antibody and evidence for induction of immune memory using meningococcal C conjugate (MCC) vaccine in preterm infants. Methods: Immunogenicity and induction of immunologic memory by as MCC vaccine was assessed in premature infants; 62 preterm and 60 term controls received MCC at the accelerated schedule (2, 3 and 4 months of age). A meningococcal C polysaccharide challenge was administered at 12 months of age. Results: Both groups achieved similar protective titers after primary immunization that then waned significantly by 1 year of age. Postchallenge serum bactericidal activity was significantly lower in preterm infants (P = 0.03); 73% of preterm versus 88% of term controls achieved a 4-fold rise in serum bactericidal activity (P = 0.07). Conclusions: MCC vaccine is immunogenic and primes for immunologic memory in preterm infants. The decreased memory responses in these preterm infants in conjunction with waning clinical efficacy data for all U.K. infants suggest a role for a routine booster dose of vaccine in all infants receiving MCC, especially those born preterm.
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)