Evidence-based US guidelines provide recommendations for the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as supportive therapy in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Pegfilgrastim is recommended for FN prophylaxis in patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving a high-risk chemotherapy regimen, or an intermediate-risk regimen if one or more risk factors are present. The guidelines highlight the patient characteristics and chemotherapy regimens for solid tumors and hematologic malignancies that may influence a patient's overall risk of FN and may benefit from pegfilgrastim support. This review aimed to evaluate how pegfilgrastim use in patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy in routine clinical practice aligns with evidence-based US guidelines. Examination of the literature revealed widespread deviation in relation to under- and over-prescribing, and timing of administration in US clinical practice. Pegfilgrastim is often over-prescribed in patients receiving palliative chemotherapy and those at low risk of FN. Potential under-prescribing of pegfilgrastim was also observed. In this literature search, data that appear to support same-day administration of pegfilgrastim were from uncontrolled studies that were limited in size. Analyses of healthcare claims data clearly favored next-day use, with statistically significant increases in FN incidence among patients receiving same-day pegfilgrastim versus those treated 1–4 days post-chemotherapy. Earlier-than-recommended administration typically occurs at the physician's discretion where next-day administration might present barriers to the patient receiving supportive therapy.There is a need to ensure appropriate prescribing to optimize patient outcomes, as deviation from the guideline recommendations was associated with increased incidence of FN and hospitalization.
Renewed interest in neutrophil transfusions has emerged with the development and clinical use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). G-CSF not only increases neutrophil (polymorphonuclear leukocyte, PMNL) production but also modulates various physiological properties of PMNL. The effects of G-CSF on PMNL-mediated fungicidal activity were evaluated by administration of G-CSF (300 micrograms/day subcutaneously) to 5 healthy volunteers for 6 days. G-CSF significantly enhanced PMNL-mediated damage of Candida albicans pseudohyphae by 33% (P=.007) on day 2 and by 44% (P=.04) on day 6 at a 10:1 effector:target ratio. In contrast, the ability of PMNL to induce damage of hyphae from either Fusarium solani or Aspergillus fumigatus did not significantly change during the study period. These data demonstrate that G-CSF administered in vivo modulates PMNL-mediated fungicidal activity against the pseudohyphal form of C. albicans, thereby suggesting potential utility of G-CSF as a biologic response-modifying therapy in some opportunistic fungal infections.
6036 Background: Economically disadvantaged and black women have worse stage-specific breast cancer outcomes than other women, even after controlling for tumor histologic features. Disparities quality of chemotherapy may contribute to differences in outcome. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of non-standard breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in black women and those of lower socioeconomic status (SES). Methods: Detailed information on patient, disease, and treatment factors was collected prospectively on 1,006 patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer in 115 oncology practices throughout the US. All patients signed informed consent. Regimens included in the guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network were considered standard regimens; all others were considered non-standard. Receipt of non-standard regimens was examined according to clinical and non-clinical factors. Differences between groups were assessed using a chi-square test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with use of non-standard regimens. Results: Non-standard regimens were used in the treatment of 136 (14%) of the participants. Black patients were twice as likely to receive a non-standard regimen as whites (23% vs. 12%, p = .0014). Patients with less than a high school education were twice as likely to receive a non-standard regimen compared with those with a college education (21% vs. 8%, p = 0.0011). Other factors associated with non-standard chemotherapy regimens were past chemotherapy exposure (p < .0001), higher stage disease (p < .0001) and geographic location (p = 0.0059). Age, comorbidity, body mass index, type of insurance, and employment status were not associated with receipt of non-standard chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, all variables that were significant in the bivariate analysis remained independently associated with receipt of non-standard chemotherapy. Conclusions: The more frequent use of non-guideline concordant adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in black women and women with lower SES may contribute to their less favorable outcomes. These findings offer an opportunity to improve patient care and perhaps cancer outcomes. [Table: see text]
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)