Background:The safety and efficacy of trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C (MMC) for surgical treatment in aphakic and pseudophaic eyes were retrospectively evaluated.Materials and Methods:The authors reviewed 51 eyes of 45 patients who had been followed up for at least 6 months after trabeculectomy using MMC for aphakic and pseudophakic eyes.The success rate and complications were analyzed.The success criteria included intraocular pressures of 21 mmHg or less with or without glaucoma medications and no loss of light perception.Surgical failure was defined as a postoperative loss of light perception in patients with preoperative vision better than light perception, additional glaucoma surgery, or phthisis bulbi in patients with preoperative vision of no light perception. 1) Results:The average follow up period was 27.7 months and the intraocular pressure was controlled under 21 mmHg in 36 eyes of 51 (70.6%) after the procedure with or without medication for glaucoma.Using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the cumulative success rate at the 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-and 36-month intervals were 98.0%, 94.1%, 91.9%, 83.4% and 75.5%, respectively.The complications observed were hyphema (4 eyes), serous choroidal detachment (4 eyes), hypotony (3 eyes), and endophthalmitis (1 eye).
Purpose: To evaluate the effects and limitations of lacrimal endoscopy without silicone tube intubation in patients with epiphora.Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 64 eyes in 49 patients who underwent lacrimal endoscopy between May 2021 and May 2022. The clinical characteristics, irrigation test results, lacrimal endoscopic findings, and type of surgery were analyzed.Results: The mean duration of symptoms was 31.2 months, and was significantly longer in the failure group than in the success group (<i>p</i> = 0.043). Irrigation tests showed passage, partial obstruction, and complete obstruction in 20 (31.3%), 16 (25.0%), and 28 (43.7%) eyes, respectively. Lacrimal endoscopy showed narrowing, mucus, fibrosis, granulation, and stones in 41 (64.0%), 12 (18.8%), 6 (9.3%), 3 (4.7%), and 2 (3.1%) eyes, respectively. Following lacrimal endoscopy, 32 (50.0%) eyes each were included in the success and failure groups. Preoperative irrigation test results did not affect the success rate (<i>p</i> = 0.203). Silicone tube intubation and dacryocystorhinostomy were performed in 5 (7.8%) and 8 (12.5%) eyes, respectively, because the symptoms did not improve after lacrimal endoscopy.Conclusions: Lacrimal endoscopy, performed without silicone tube intubation, was effective in improving symptoms and may guide the choice of surgical technique, if required.
Background/Aims: Second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that progresses following gemcitabine-based treatment has not been established.This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line combination chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) in these patients.Methods: Between August 2011 and May 2014, all patients who received at least one cycle of XELOX (capecitabine, 1,000 mg/m 2 twice daily for 14 days; oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m 2 on day 1 of a 3-week cycle) combination chemotherapy for unresectable or recurrent PDAC were retrospectively recruited.The response was evaluated every 9 weeks, and the tumor response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival, and adverse events were assessed.Results: Sixty-two patients were included; seven patients (11.3%) had a partial tumor response, and 20 patients (32.3%) had stable disease.The median progression-free and overall survival were 88 days (range, 35.1 to 140.9 days) and 158 days (range, 118.1 to 197.9 days), respectively.Patients who remained stable longer with frontline therapy (≥120 days) exhibited significantly longer progression-free and overall survival.The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse events in patients were vomiting (8.1%) and anorexia (6.5%).There was one treatmentrelated mortality caused by severe neutropenia and typhlitis.Conclusions: Second-line XELOX combination chemotherapy demonstrated an acceptable response and survival rate in patients with advanced PDAC who had failed gemcitabinebased chemotherapy.(Gut
To present a rare case of a conjunctival hypertrophic scar presenting as eyelid mass after surgical treatment of a chalazion. A 74-year-old man visited our clinic with severe ocular discomfort and excessive lacrimation since several months in his left eye accompanied by itching of the upper eyelid. Examination of the anterior segment revealed a 6 mm (horizontal) × 8 mm (vertical) round, immobile, hard, mushroom-shaped protruding mass on the tarsal conjunctiva of his left eye. There was no associated pigmentation, ulceration, or tenderness. Excisional biopsy of the benign conjunctival tumor was performed using radiofrequency electrosurgical systems. The region of the excised conjunctiva was well-healed on postoperative day 14, and there was no recurrence until 1 year post-surgery. Histopathological examination demonstrated thick interlacing collagenous fibrous bundles oriented in random directions and fibroblastic proliferation. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that spindle-shaped fibroblasts were positive for CD34 and negative for smooth muscle actin. The excessive collagenous tissue was stained blue by Masson trichrome stain. These findings were consistent with a hypertrophic scar of the conjunctiva. This short report demonstrates that a hypertrophic scar of the conjunctiva can develop after surgery of a chalazion and cause severe ocular discomfort and excessive lacrimation. These lesions can be easily removed using simple excision.
대한안과학회지 2020년 제 61 권 제 3 호 -Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BOTULAX Ⓡ in subjects with essential blepharospasm.Methods: In this study, a total of 250 subjects with essential blepharospasm were enrolled at 15 investigational sites and a total of 220 subjects completed the study.The efficacy and safety were evaluated at weeks 4 and 16 after treatment compared with baseline.In total, 240 subjects were enrolled, treated with the investigational product, and evaluable for the primary efficacy assessment at week 4 after treatment; these subjects were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population.With the ITT set as the main efficacy set, efficacy assessment included Jankovic rating scale (JRS), functional disability score, investigator evaluation of global response and quality of life.Safety assessment including the incidence of adverse events was also performed.Results: In terms of the primary efficacy endpoint (i.e., change in JRS total score at week 4 after treatment from baseline [ITT set]), mean change indicated a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.0001) and demonstrated the non-inferiority of the test drug to similar drugs.In terms of the secondary efficacy endpoints, mean change in JRS total score at week 16 after treatment and mean change in functional disability score at weeks 4 and 16 after treatment both exhibited a statistically significant reduction compared with baseline (p < 0.0001 for all).Among the 249 subjects treated with the investigational product in this study, 44 (17.67%) experienced 76 treatment emergent adverse events but no serious adverse events were observed.Conclusions: Based on the study results, BOTULAX Ⓡ is considered to be an effective and safe treatment for essential blepharospasm.
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition of pancreatic solid tumor requires a strict recommendation for its proper use in clinical practice because of its technical difficulty and invasiveness. The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy appointed a Task Force to draft clinical practice guidelines for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of pancreatic solid tumor. The strength of recommendation and the level of evidence for each statement were graded according to the Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014. The committee, comprising a development panel of 16 endosonographers and an expert on guideline development methodology, developed 12 evidence-based recommendations in eight categories intended to help physicians make evidence-based clinical judgments with regard to the diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumor. This clinical practice guideline discusses EUS-guided sampling in pancreatic solid tumor and makes recommendations on circumstances that warrant its use, technical issues related to maximizing the diagnostic yield (e.g., needle type, needle diameter, adequate number of needle passes, sample obtaining techniques, and methods of specimen processing), adverse events of EUS-guided tissue acquisition, and learning-related issues. This guideline was reviewed by external experts and suggests best practices recommended based on the evidence available at the time of preparation. This guideline may not be applicable for all clinical situations and should be interpreted in light of specific situations and the availability of resources. It will be revised as necessary to cover progress and changes in technology and evidence from clinical practice.
Severe cough may contribute to serous coplications such as pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, rib fracture, subconjunctival hemorrhage, subdural hemorrhage and cough syncope. However abdominal wall hematoma is a rare complication. Because it usually presents with abdmoianal pain, abdominal wall hematoma needs to be differentiated from the acute surgical abdomen. A 78-year-old woman was admitted with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and a palpable mass for several days. She experienced abdominal pain after violent coughing associated with an upper respiratory tract in fection. Abdominal computed tomography revealed an approximately 7×4 cm sized, ill-defined, soft tissue density lesion in the right lower posterolateral abdominal wall. An abdominal wall hematoma was diagnosed. After admission, she had persistent right lower abdominal pain and an increasing mass. The mass was surgically removed and she was discharged without complications. In summary, when a patient complains of abdmonial pain after severe coughing, an abdominal wall hematomas as a differential diagnosis must be considered.
Purpose: To evaluate the surgical result of lacrimal surgery with total removal of the nasal mucosal flap. Methods: Lacrimal surgery was performed in 30 eyes of 26 patients, by external approach without the nasal mucosal flap from February 2001 to August 2002. The surgical method was similar to conventional dacryocystorhinostomy, but the nasal mucosa of the osteotomy site was removed with a No.11 Bard-Parker blade and Westcott scissors. After insertion of a silicone tube, the anterior flap of the lacrimal sac was sutured to the soft tissues around the osteotomy site. Surgical efficacy was evaluated after a follow-up period of 722 months (average, 11.5 months). Results: The primary success rate was 96.7% (29/30 eyes). We performed revision of mucosa ostium in the one failed eye, thereby raising the final success rate to 100%. The size of mucosa ostium was 0.73.0 mm (average 1.17 mm). Conclusions: Satisfactory surgical results were obtained without anastomosis of the lacrimal sac or the nasal mucosa during external approach, lacrimal surgery. We suggest that this method is a good surgical procedure in external approach, lacrimal surgery.
253 Background: Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is a valuable prognostic marker in several kinds of solid tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the NLR, PLR and change of NLR and PLR over time as a prognostic marker in unresectable gallbladder cancer (GBC) which is treated with palliative chemotherapy. Methods: A total of 163 patients with pathologically confirmed unresectable GBC were enrolled. Baseline and post 1-cycle chemotherapy NLR and PLR were used in analysis. The changes in NLR and PLR were defined as the ratio of post chemotherapy value to baseline value. The relation between survival time and NLR and PLR changes were analyzed. Results: NLR and PLR had AUC value of 0.679, 0.660 in predicting 1-year overall survival (OS) and NLR 1.96 and PLR 111 were the optimal cutoff value with the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity. NLR change and PLR change had AUC value of 0.517, 0.519 in predicting 1-year OS and NLR change 0.4, PLR change 0.6 were the optimal cutoff value. Patients with NLR lower than 1.96 had better OS (16.1 months vs. 9.5 months, p < 0.001) and similarly patients with PLR lower than 111 had better OS (17.3 months vs. 9.5 months, p < 0.001). However, NLR change lower than 0.4 didn’t show better OS (9.2 months vs. 11.6 months, p = 0.178), and the same with PLR change lower than 0.6 (8.5 months vs. 11.3 months, p = 0.138). Conclusions: Baseline NLR and PLR is a valuable predictor of overall survival in unresectable GBC undergoing palliative chemotherapy, whereas NLR and PLR change over time is not.