Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) rather than radiotherapy (RT) has resulted in fewer locoregional recurrences (LRRs), but no decrease in distant metastasis (DM) rate for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In many countries, patients receive post-operative chemotherapy (pCT) to improve oncological outcomes. We investigated the value of pCT after pre-operative CRT in the RAPIDO trial.Patients were randomised between experimental (short-course RT, chemotherapy and surgery) and standard-of-care treatment (CRT, surgery and pCT depending on hospital policy). In this substudy, we compared curatively resected patients from the standard-of-care group who received pCT (pCT+ group) with those who did not (pCT- group). Subsequently, patients from the pCT+ group who received at least 75% of the prescribed chemotherapy cycles (pCT ≥75% group) were compared with patients who did not receive pCT (pCT-/- group). By propensity score stratification (PSS), we adjusted for the following unbalanced confounders: age, clinical extramural vascular invasion, distance to the anal verge, ypT stage, ypN stage, residual tumour, serious adverse event (SAE) and/or readmission within 6 weeks after surgery and SAE related to pre-operative CRT. Cumulative probability of disease-free survival (DFS), DM, LRR and overall survival (OS) was analysed by Cox regression.In total, 396/452 patients had a curative resection. The number of patients in the pCT+, pCT >75%, pCT- and pCT-/- groups was 184, 112, 154 and 149, respectively. The PSS-adjusted analyses for all endpoints demonstrated hazard ratios between approximately 0.7 and 0.8 (pCT+ versus pCT-), and 0.5 and 0.8 (pCT ≥75% versus pCT-/-). However, all 95% confidence intervals included 1.These data suggest a benefit of pCT after pre-operative CRT for patients with high-risk LARC, with approximately 20%-25% improvement in DFS and OS and 20%-25% risk reductions in DM and LRR. Compliance with pCT additionally reduces or improves all endpoints by 10%-20%. However, differences are not statistically significant.
The number of elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma is rising. Elderly patients differ from their younger counterparts in, among others, higher incidence of comorbidity and reduced organ function. Age influences outcome of surgery, and therefore has to be taken into account in elderly patients eligible for cytoreductive nephrectomy. Over the last decade several novel effective drugs have become available for the metastatic setting targeting angiogenesis and mammalian target of rapamycin. Immune checkpoint blockade with a programmed death 1 antibody has recently been shown to increase survival and further studies with immune checkpoint inhibitors are ongoing. In this review we summarize the available data on efficacy and toxicity of existing and emerging therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the elderly. Where possible, we provide evidence-based recommendations for treatment choices in elderly.
Postapproval trials and patient registries have their pros and cons in the generation of postapproval data. No direct comparison between clinical outcomes of these data sources currently exists for advanced melanoma patients. We aimed to investigate whether a patient registry can complement or even replace postapproval trials. Postapproval single-arm clinical trial data from the Medicines Evaluation Board and real-world data from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry were used. The study population consisted of advanced melanoma patients with brain metastases treated with targeted therapies (BRAF- or BRAF-MEK inhibitors) in the first line. A Cox hazard regression model and a propensity score matching (PSM) model were used to compare the two patient populations. Compared to patients treated in postapproval trials (n = 467), real-world patients (n = 602) had significantly higher age, higher ECOG performance status, more often ≥3 organ involvement and more symptomatic brain metastases. Lactate dehydrogenase levels were similar between both groups. The unadjusted median overall survival (mOS) in postapproval clinical trial patients was 8.7 (95% CI, 8.1-10.4) months compared to 7.2 (95% CI, 6.5-7.7) months (P < 0.01) in real-world patients. With the Cox hazard regression model, survival was adjusted for prognostic factors, which led to a statistically insignificant difference in mOS for trial and real-world patients of 8.7 (95% CI, 7.9-10.4) months compared to 7.3 (95% CI, 6.3-7.9) months, respectively. The PSM model resulted in 310 matched patients with similar survival (P = 0.9). Clinical outcomes of both data sources were similar. Registries could be a complementary data source to postapproval clinical trials to establish information on clinical outcomes in specific subpopulations.
Abstract Aim To report the long term results of the CROSS trial with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy according to the Dutch randomised controlled ChemoRadiotherapy for Oesophageal cancer followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) has become standard of care for patients with cancer of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction. Methods Patients with locally advanced resectable squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction were randomised between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (five weekly cycles of intravenous carboplatin [AUC 2 mg/mL per min] and intravenous paclitaxel [50 mg/m² of body-surface area]) with concurrent 41.4 Gy radiotherapy given in 23 fractions of 1.8 Gy, 5 days per week) plus surgery versus surgery alone. Primary endpoint was overall survival, defined from date of randomisation to date of all-cause death or to last day of follow-up. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Results Between March 2004 and 2008, eight centres enrolled 368 patients. Some 178 were analysed in the chemoradiotherapy plus surgery group and 188 in the surgery alone group. After a median follow-up for surviving patients of 146.6 months (IQR 133.5-156.6), median overall survival was 49.0 months (95%CI 34.7-76.6) in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery group compared to 25.1 months (95%CI 19.1-39.4) in the surgery alone group, which was significantly different (HR 0.71 [95%CI 0.55-0.90]; log-rank p=0·005). Ten-year overall survival was 38% (95%CI 31%-45%) in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery group compared to 26% (95%CI 20%-33%) in the surgery alone group (HR 0.69 [95%CI 0.54-0.89]). For patients with squamous cell carcinoma ten-year overall survival was 46% (95%CI 33%-64%) in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery group compared to 23% (95%CI 13%-40%) in the surgery alone group. For patients with adenocarcinoma ten-year overall survival was 36% (95%CI 29%-45%) in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery group compared to 26% (95%CI 20%-35%) in the surgery alone group. Conclusion Survival benefit of patients with locally advanced resectable squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy persists for at least 10 years compared to patients undergoing surgery alone.
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)