The burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including cancer, in Africa is rising. Policymakers are charged with formulating evidence-based cancer control plans; however, there is a paucity of data on cancers generated from within Africa. As part of efforts to enhance cancer research training in East Africa, we performed a needs assessment and gap analysis of cancer-related research training resources in Tanzania.A mixed-methods study to evaluate existing individual, institutional, and national resources supporting cancer research training in Tanzania was conducted. Qualitative data were collected using in-depth interviews while quantitative data were collected using self-administered questionnaires and online surveys. The study also included a desk-review of policy and guidelines related to NCD research and training. Study participants were selected to represent five groups: (i) policymakers; (ii) established researchers; (iii) research support personnel; (iv) faculty members in degree training programs; and (v) post-graduate trainees.Our results identified challenges in four thematic areas. First, there is a need for coordination and monitoring of the cancer research agenda at the national level. Second, both faculty and trainees identified the need for incorporation of rigorous training to improve research competencies. Third, sustained mentoring and institutional investment in development of mentorship resources is critical to empowering early career investigators. Finally, academic institutions can enhance research outputs by providing adequate research infrastructure, prioritizing protected time for research, and recognizing research accomplishments by trainees and faculty.As we look towards establishment of cancer research training programs in East Africa, investment in the development of rigorous research training, mentorship resources, and research infrastructure will be critical to empowering local health professionals to engage in cancer research activities.
Introduction Sub-Saharan Africa bears a disproportionate burden of cancer-related morbidity and mortality compared with high-resource settings. Although pathology services are essential to providing optimal oncological care, diagnostic capacity in sub-Saharan Africa is insufficient for the cancer burden. This scoping review will be conducted to summarise the current state of practices and evidence for interventions and implementation strategies to improve anatomic pathology services for cancer in the region. The objective of this scoping review is to describe efforts to strengthen capacity for anatomic pathology services in sub-Saharan Africa. The information gathered will be used to inform the design of future pathology capacity-building interventions. The primary aim of the scoping review is to comprehensively map the existing evidence on initiatives aimed at enhancing the capacity for pathology services. Methods and analysis This study will follow Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central and African Index Medicus will be searched for articles published in English and Portuguese with no limitations placed on date or publication type. A limited search for grey literature will be conducted using the WHO Institutional Repository for Information Sharing. Two independent reviewers will screen all articles, extract data and complete the descriptive analysis. All discrepancies will be resolved using a third reviewer. The results will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). This review will consider scientific literature from published primary studies as well as scoping and systematic reviews related to capacity-building efforts to strengthen anatomic pathology services in any sub-Saharan African country. All study designs will be considered, including quantitative, qualitative and/or mixed-methods studies. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required for this study. Dissemination of findings from this work will include the publication of the results in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at conferences. Protocol registration number Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/6cmhg .
Context.— Rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) is critical in determining sample adequacy and triaging cytology samples. Although fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the primary method of initial tissue sampling in Tanzania, ROSE is not practiced. Objective.— To investigate the performance of ROSE in determining cellular adequacy and providing preliminary diagnoses in breast FNAB in a low-resource setting. Design.— Patients with breast masses were recruited prospectively from the FNAB clinic at Muhimbili National Hospital. Each FNAB was evaluated by ROSE for overall specimen adequacy, cellularity, and preliminary diagnosis. The preliminary interpretation was compared to the final cytologic diagnosis and histologic diagnosis, when available. Results.— Fifty FNAB cases were evaluated, and all were adequate for diagnosis on ROSE and final interpretation. Overall percentage of agreement (OPA) between preliminary and final cytologic diagnosis was 84%, positive percentage of agreement (PPA) was 33%, and negative percentage of agreement (NPA) was 100% (κ = 0.4, P < .001). Twenty-one cases had correlating surgical resections. OPA between preliminary cytologic and histologic diagnoses was 67%, PPA was 22%, and NPA was 100% (κ = 0.2, P = .09). OPA between final cytologic and histologic diagnoses was 95%, PPA was 89%, and NPA was 100% (κ = 0.9, P = <.001). Conclusions.— False-positive rates of ROSE diagnoses for breast FNAB are low. While preliminary cytologic diagnoses had a high false-negative rate, final cytologic diagnoses had overall high concordance with histologic diagnoses. Therefore, the role of ROSE for preliminary diagnosis should be considered carefully in low-resource settings, and it may need to be paired with additional interventions to improve pathologic diagnosis.
Abstract Objective: We propose to utilize tumor biospecimens from patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) to identify possible genetic, molecular, and infectious determinants of this high-incidence disease in East Africa. However, laboratory technologies in East Africa are not available to support DNA and RNA extraction and genome and transcriptome sequencing from patient specimens. In preparation for establishment of a biorepository for African ESCC specimens, we compared different fixation and preservation media for transportability over long distances and success in preserving the genetic integrity and expression profiles of ESCC. Methods: Patients with a suspected diagnosis of ESCC at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania were identified and consented prior to endoscopic evaluations. For patients with endoscopic findings consistent with ESCC, tumor biopsies were obtained and stored using two different fixation and preservation media: PAXgene® Tissue Container (n=2) and RNAlater® (n=2). All specimens were shipped at room temperature from Dar es Salaam to San Francisco. DNA and RNA quantity was measured by nanodrop method and DNA was further confirmed by picogreen method, yielding measures of total DNA and RNA acquired (ug). DNA quality was measured as percent of total DNA degradation to between 200-1000 bp. RNA quality measure was determined by bioanalyzer output measure RNA Integrity Number (RIN). Results: Specimens for our first 10 patients were analyzed. Average transit time of biopsy specimens in preservative at room temperature was 6.2 days (range 3.5-9.0). Tumor specimens preserved with PAXgene® yielded a mean of 7.7 ug total DNA and 8.6 ug total RNA. Tumor specimens preserved with RNAlater® yielded a mean 1.4 ug of DNA and 8.2 ug of RNA. DNA degradation products were 0% of total with PAXgene® versus 6% of total with RNAlater®. Specimens preserved with PAXgene® yielded a mean RIN of 4, while RNAlater® yielded a mean RIN of 9. DNA and RNA quality were not associated with length of time at room temperature, up to a maximum of 9 days. Conclusion: Tissue preserved using the PAXgene® Tissue Container yielded higher DNA quantity and quality than tissue preserved in RNAlater®. RNA quantity was comparable for both mediums, but RNAlater® resulted in superior RNA quality versus PAXgene®. Both mediums allowed for flexible transport of specimens at room temperature and merit further inquiry into their potential as cost-effective methods to facilitate molecular analyses for geographically isolated diseases in Africa. Based upon our pilot data, each medium offers unique advantages. Our expanded study will continue to utilize both mediums to optimize isolation of both DNA and RNA. We will plan to present data for an enriched sample size. Funding source: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Administrative Supplement to Promote Cancer Prevention and Control Research in Low and Middle Income Countries, A119617, [CA-0082629]. Citation Format: Beatrice Paul Mushi, John Greer, Charles William Cahalane, II, Msiba Selekwa, Ali Mwanga, Larry Akoko, Elia Mmbaga, Eric Collisson, Katherine Van Loon. A pilot study to establish procedures for DNA and RNA isolation from African esophageal tumor specimens [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR International Conference: New Frontiers in Cancer Research; 2017 Jan 18-22; Cape Town, South Africa. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(22 Suppl):Abstract nr B39.
Abstract Objective Few studies characterizing clinical outcomes of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients in sub-Saharan Africa report the proportion of patients who initiate and complete treatment, information integral to contextualizing survival outcomes. This retrospective cohort study describes HNC patients who presented to Muhimbili National Hospital and Ocean Road Cancer Institute in 2018, the highest-volume oncology tertiary referral centers in Tanzania. Logistic regression was applied to assess predictors of treatment initiation and completion. Results Among the 176 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients, 34% (59) had no treatment documented, 34%(59) had documentation of treatment initiation but not completion, and 33%(58) had documentation of treatment completion based on the modalities started. Univariate logistic regression showed that late-stage disease was associated with increased odds of initiating treatment (OR 8.24, 95% CI 2.05–33.11, p = 0.003) and trends toward completing treatment (OR 7.41, 95% CI 0.90–60.99, p = 0.063). At last visit, 36.9%(65) were alive with a median follow up of 5.6 months (IQR 1.64—12.5 months). A large proportion of HNC patients who presented to MNH and ORCI did not initiate or complete treatment. These metrics are critical to contextualize care outcomes of HNC patients in resource-constrained health systems and develop interventions.