A continuing concern of primary care is to produce economical methods of case finding among elderly patients to reduce unmet need in practice populations. This paper reports the use of a postal questionnaire to identify high dependency groups and the use of statistical methods to produce a formula which weights the relative importance of different items in identifying patients with a high level of dependency. It appears possible to identify such high dependency cases reliably at the cost of assessing between one half and two thirds of the population aged 75 years and over.
e13771 Background: The heterogeneity in health and functional ability among older patients makes the management of cancer a unique challenge. The Geriatric Oncology Program at the University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical Center (BWMC) was created to optimize cancer management and recommendations for older patients. This study aimed to assess the benefits of the implementation of such a program at a community- based academic cancer center. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients aged ≥80 years presenting to the Geriatric Oncology Program between January 2017 and July 2022. A multidisciplinary team of specialists collectively reviewed each patient using geriatric-specific domains and stratified each patient into one of three management groups- Group 1: those deemed fit to receive standard oncologic care (SOC); Group 2: those recommended to receive optimization services prior to reassessment for SOC; and Group 3: those deemed to be best suited for supportive care and/ or hospice care. ANOVA, chi-square, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess patient outcomes. Results: Among 233 patients included, 76 (32.6%) received SOC (Group 1), 43 (18.5%) were optimized (Group 2), and 114 (49.0%) received supportive care or hospice referral (Group 3). There was no significant difference in sex, race, or age among all three groups. The Canadian Study of Health and Aging-Clinical Frailty Scale (CSHA-CFS) score was implemented in 2019 (n=90). Patients receiving supportive/ hospice care only had an average score of 5.8, while the averages for those in the optimization and SOC groups were 4.6 and 4.1, respectively (p=< .001). SOC patients had the longest average survival of 2.71 years compared to the optimization (2.30 years) and supportive care groups (0.93 years) (p= <0.001). 69.8% of optimized patients were deemed fit for SOC upon re-evaluation following optimization services. For all patients that underwent surgical interventions, post- operatively, 23 patients (85%) were discharged home and 4 (15%) were discharged to a rehab facility. The average survival after surgery for all patients was 3.16 years, while patients who were optimized prior to surgery had an average survival after surgery of 3.21 years. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates the need for specialized consideration of the heterogeneity that cancer diagnoses present in older individuals. The Geriatric Oncology Program at BWMC is able to maximize treatment outcomes for geriatric patients through the provision of SOC therapies and optimization services, while also minimizing unnecessary interventions on an individual patient-centric level.
The current quality improvement initiative evaluated the medication reconciliation process within select nursing homes in Washington, DC. The identification of common types of medication discrepancies through monthly retrospective chart reviews of newly admitted patients in two different nursing homes were described. The use of high-risk medications, namely antidiabetic, anticoagulant, and opioid agents, was also recorded. A standardized spreadsheet tool based on multiple medication reconciliation implementation tool kits was created to record the information. The five most common medication discrepancies were incorrect indication (21%), no monitoring parameters (17%), medication name omitted (11%), incorrect dose (10%), and incorrect frequency (8%). Antidiabetic agents in both sites were the most used high-risk medication. This initiative highlights that medication discrepancies on admission are common in nursing homes and may be clinically impactful. More attention needs to be given to work flow processes to improve medication reconciliation considering the increased risk for adverse drug events and hospitalizations. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing and Mental Health Services, 43(4), 9-14.].
Polypharmacy, defined as the use of five or more medications, is becoming increasingly prevalent in older adults throughout the United States. Depre-scribing, along with the use of existing tools, such as the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria, can help guide health care providers in reducing the risks associated with polypharmacy such as side effects and drug interactions. The framework of deprescribing and the use of existing guidelines and resources are valuable in guiding health care providers in addressing polypharmacy. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 45(1), 9-15.].
