To describe the surgical anatomy and clinical outcomes of a technique for securing cochlear implant receiver/stimulators (R/S). Receiver/stimulators are generally secured by drilling a custom-fit seat and suture-retaining holes in the skull. However, rare intracranial complications and R/S migration have been reported with this standard method. Newer R/S designs feature a low profile and larger, rigid flat bottoms in which drilling a seat may be less appropriate. We report a technique for securing the R/S without drilling bone.Anatomic: Forty-eight half-heads were studied. Digital photography and morphometric analysis demonstrated anatomic boundaries of the subpericranial pocket (t-pocket). Clinical: Retrospective series of 227 consecutive Cochlear implant recipients implanted during a 2-year period using either the t-pocket or standard technique. The main outcome measures were rates of R/S migration and intracranial complications. Minimum follow-up was 12 months.The t-pocket is limited anteriorly by dense condensations of pericranium anteriorly at the temporal-parietal suture, posteroinferiorly at the lamdoid suture, and anteroinferiorly by the bony ridge of the squamous suture. One hundred seventy-one subjects were implanted using the t-pocket technique and 56 using the standard technique, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. There were no cases of migration or intracranial complications in either group.The t-pocket secures the R/S with anatomically consistent strong points of fixation while precluding dural complications. There were no cases of migration or intracranial complication noted. Further trials and device-specific training with this technique are necessary before it is widely adopted.
Processes of scattering and attenuation were investigated to determine the consequence on dose distributions by having a cochlear implant in the field of therapeutic radiation.Radiation oncology medical accelerator beams of 6- and 18-MV x-ray energy were used. Five cochlear implants were investigated.Each implant model was individually studied using computer dose modeling and through exercises in radiation measurement during live delivery.No side scatter was detected, and negligible backscattering was observed for the primary device housing and electrodes. Attenuation consequences were found to be dependent on the model of cochlear implant studied and specifically dependent on the material composition of each device.The maximum attenuated dose change for the study was found to be -8.8% for 6 MV and -6.6% for 18 MV. This study presents the first comparison of therapeutic radiation delivery versus computerized treatment simulation involving cochlear implants.
Conclusions: Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is able to assess the trajectory of the implanted cochlear implant (CI) array. This is essential to determine specific effects of electrode design and surgical innovations on outcomes in cochlear implantation. CBCT is a non-invasive approach yielding similar data to histopathological analyses, with encouraging potential for use in surgical, clinical and research settings. Objectives: To examine the fidelity of CBCT imaging and custom 3D visualization in characterizing CI insertion in comparison to gold standard, histopathological examination. Methods: Eleven human temporal bones were implanted with the 'Straight Research Array' (SRA). Post-insertion, they were imaged with a prototype mobile C-arm for intraoperative CBCT. Post-acquisition processing of low-dose CBCT images produced high-resolution 3D volumes with sub-millimetre spatial resolution (isotropic 0.2 mm3 voxels). The bones were resin impregnated and sectioned for light microscopic examination. Dimensional electrode characteristics visible in section images were compared with corresponding CBCT images by independent observers. Results: Overall, CBCT demonstrated adequate resolution to detect: 1) scala implanted; 2) kinking; 3) number of intracochlear contacts; 4) appropriate ascension of the array; and overall confirms ideal insertion. CBCT did not demonstrate adequate resolution to detect reversal of electrode contacts or basilar membrane rupture.
'/%3e%3c/defs%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0h10080v5040H0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='.6' d='m0 0 6 3m0-3L0 3' clip-path='url(%23b)' transform='scale(840)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23e4002b' stroke-width='.4' d='m0 0 6 3m0-3L0 3' clip-path='url(%23c)' transform='scale(840)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='840' d='M2520 0v2520M0 1260h5040'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23e4002b' stroke-width='504' d='M2520 0v2520M0 1260h5040'/%3e%3cg fill='%23fff'%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' x='2520' y='3780'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' x='7560' y='4200'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' x='6300' y='2205'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' x='7560' y='840'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' x='8680' y='1869'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23e' x='8064' y='2730'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
