ABSTRACT Background Immune effector cell (IEC) therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)‐modified T‐cell therapy, have shown efficacy in pediatric B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL) and are being investigated for other malignancies. A common toxicity associated with IEC therapy is cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which can lead to cardiovascular decompensation due to systemic inflammation. Data are limited regarding cardiovascular adverse effects in children. This study aims to describe the cardiovascular adverse effect profile of IEC therapies in pediatric patients with hematologic and solid tumor malignancies. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who received IECs directed towards various targets in patients with hematologic, solid, and brain tumor malignancies from January 2014 to June 2023 at Texas Children's Hospital. The primary end point was hypotension requiring vasoactive support and/or heart failure within 30 days of infusion. Results A total of 203 patients met inclusion criteria. Pretreatment echocardiogram was available for 142 (70%) pediatric patients, of whom 140 (96%) had normal baseline systolic function. Hypotension requiring vasoactive support occurred in 26 (13%) patients. Hematologic malignancy indications ( p = 0.002), total body irradiation (TBI) ( p = 0.002), and allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HCT) ( p = 0.035) were associated with increased risk of hypotension requiring vasoactive support. Follow‐up echocardiograms were available for 14 patients who met the primary end point, and all showed return to baseline within 6 months. Conclusions Significant hemodynamic compromise occurred in a minority of patients treated with IEC therapies. All experiencing cardiac dysfunction had recovery of function, and there was no cardiovascular‐related mortality.
Background: Computer-based cognitive rehabilitation programs may help adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer-related cognitive impairment. This pilot study investigated the feasibility of cognitive rehabilitation as a preventive intervention for AYA patients receiving chemotherapy. Explorative objectives included the correlation of cognitive performance with serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Methods: This pilot prospective study included English-speaking patients 12-25 years of age with a fist diagnosis of cancer requiring chemotherapy. Participants enrolled in the intervention arm participated in a computer-based neurocognitive training program for 20-30 minutes daily for 16 weeks. Outcome measures, including engagement with and completion of computerized neurocognitive testing and serum BDNF levels, were obtained within the first month following diagnosis, ∼16 and 24 weeks from enrollment. Results: Fourteen of 18 eligible patients provided consent, with 7 patients assigned to each the intervention arm and nonintervention arm. Seventy-one percent of the patients in the intervention arm completed at least 80% of the required activities. Compared to baseline, patients in the nonintervention arm demonstrated higher prevalence of impairment in four of the six cognitive domains (processing speed, visual attention, attention/working memory, and executive function) at the end of the study period. There was a nonstatistically significant reduction of serum BDNF levels over time, which was observed in both intervention and nonintervention arms. Conclusion: This pilot study provides some evidence that it is feasible for AYAs with new cancer diagnoses to receive standardized cognitive rehabilitation. Patients receiving cognitive activities experienced less impairment in numerous cognitive domains.
Introduction Matched related donor (MRD) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is an accepted treatment for sickle cell disease (SCD). Alemtuzumab is a lymphocytic medication that can reduce the risk of GVHD; however, it is associated with mixed donor chimerism (MDC) and graft loss when used with submyeloablative conditioning. We explored the use of myeloablative chemotherapy with alemtuzumab in MRD HCT for SCD to concurrently prevent GVHD and promote durable engraftment. Methods We retrospectively reviewed outcomes for patients that underwent MRD HCT for SCD at Texas Children's Hospital between 2003-2017. All patients received busulfan intravenously every 6 hours for 4 days (target AUC: 800-1200 μM per minute) and cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg daily for 4 days. GVHD prophylaxis included intravenous alemtuzumab daily for 3-4 doses starting on day -5 (5-15 kg=3 mg, 15-30 kg=5 mg, >30 kg=10 mg daily), methotrexate and a calcineurin inhibitor. Donor chimerism was evaluated periodically via short tandem repeats or fluorescent-in-situ hybridization of nucleated cells from the peripheral blood. Persistent MDC was defined by the presence of recipient cells on 2 consecutive evaluations without return to full donor chimerism at last follow-up. Results Thirty-eight consecutive patients underwent MRD transplant (3 non-sibling and 35 sibling) with a median age at transplant of 8.6 yrs (range: 2.9-18.4 yr). Stem cell source consisted of bone marrow grafts for all patients. Two patients concurrently received cord blood from the same donor. Neutrophil engraftment was achieved in all patients at a median time of 19 days (range: 13-24 days). Incidence of persistent MDC was 60.5% with a median last chimerism of 94% donor cells (range: 24-100%). Three of 23 patients (13.0%) with persistent MDC had Conclusions Myeloablative conditioning was well tolerated, and the addition of alemtuzumab minimized occurrence of significant GVHD. Chimerism stabilized at >50% donor cells in most patients and no graft rejection or recurrence of SCD occurred. This regimen may be a promising approach for patients with SCD that can tolerate myeloablative chemotherapy.
IntroductionHematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is a curative strategy for pediatric patients with high risk and relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), including those with Central Nervous System (CNS) involvement. There are limited data on the outcomes following HSCT in pediatric patients with ALL and CNS disease and no consensus on optimal CNS prophylaxis and treatmentMethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of pediatric patients who underwent HSCT for ALL from 2006-2016 at our institution. We compared outcomes for patients with CNS positive and CNS negative ALL. CNS positivity was defined as any CNS leukemic involvement either at original diagnosis of leukemia or relapse prior to HSCT.ResultsOne hundred and thirty two patients were evaluated of which 82 (62%) were CNS negative and 50 (38%) were CNS positive. Patient and transplant characteristics were similar in both group except for disease status (Table 1). There was a higher proportion of patients with CR2/> relapse (36, 72%) in the CNS positive group compared to the CNS negative group (43, 52%) (p=0.029). Majority received myeloablative conditioning (MAC) that was TBI based in all but 3 patients. Cranial boost (CB) was given prior to HSCT to 30/50 CNS positive patient per institutional standards. Outcomes for both CNS positive and CNS negative patients were comparable (OS, DFS and Cumulative Incidence (CI) of relapse in patients that were CNS positive was 58%, 50% and 26% respectively and for CNS-negative: 68%, 66%, 23% respectively; P-values: 0.301,0.297, 0.896). In the CNS negative group, 0/23 relapses after transplant occurred in the CNS compared to 4/14 relapses in the CNS positive group. All 4 patients with CNS relapse post-transplant were in CR3 and had relapsed in the CNS at referral to HSCT. Two of the 4 received a reduced intensity regimen and 1 had not received a CB pre-HSCT due to prior CNS irradiation.ConclusionOur experience demonstrates that the outcomes after HSCT for pediatric patients with ALL with and without CNS involvement are comparable. For CNS positive patients the use of TBI-based MAC regimens with CB pre-transplant is associated with similar rates of DFS and relapse without deleterious effect on OS compared to the CNS negative group, despite a higher proportion coming to HSCT in CR2/> relapse. No additional CNS prophylaxis is required for patients that are CNS negative.
Purpose of review Low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), primarily in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), predominantly experience the burden of sickle cell disease (SCD). High frequency of acute and chronic complications leads to increased utilization of healthcare, which burdens fragile health systems. Mortality for children with limited healthcare access remains alarmingly high. Cellular based therapies such as allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) are increasingly used in resource-rich settings as curative therapy for SCD. Broad access to curative therapies for SCD in SSA would dramatically alter the global impact of the disease. Recent findings Currently, application of cellular based therapies in LMICs is limited by cost, personnel, and availability of HSCT-specific technologies and supportive care. Despite the challenges, HSCT for SCD is moving forward in LMICs. Highly anticipated gene modification therapies have recently proven well tolerated and feasible in clinical trials in resource-rich countries, but access remains extremely limited. Summary Translation of curative cellular based therapies for SCD should be prioritized to LMICs where the disease burden and cost of noncurative treatments is high, and long-term quality of life is poor. Focus on thoughtful modifications of current and future therapies to meet the need in LMICs, especially in SSA, will be especially impactful.
Chronic active Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) disease (CAEBV) is characterized by high levels of EBV predominantly in T and/or natural killer cells with lymphoproliferation, organ failure due to infiltration of tissues with virus-infected cells, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and/or lymphoma. The disease is more common in Asia than in the United States and Europe. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is considered the only curative therapy for CAEBV, its efficacy and the best treatment modality to reduce disease severity prior to HSCT is unknown. Here, we retrospectively assessed an international cohort of 57 patients outside of Asia. Treatment of the disease varied widely, although most patients ultimately proceeded to HSCT. Though patients undergoing HSCT had better survival than those who did not (55% vs 25%, P < .01), there was still a high rate of death in both groups. Mortality was largely not affected by age, ethnicity, cell-type involvement, or disease complications, but development of lymphoma showed a trend with increased mortality (56% vs 35%, P = .1). The overwhelming majority (75%) of patients who died after HSCT succumbed to relapsed disease. CAEBV remains challenging to treat when advanced disease is present. Outcomes would likely improve with better disease control strategies, earlier referral for HSCT, and close follow-up after HSCT including aggressive management of rising EBV DNA levels in the blood.
Adoptive transfer of virus-specific T cells (VSTs) has been shown to be safe and effective in stem cell transplant recipients. However, the lack of virus-experienced T cells in donor cord blood (CB) has prevented the development of ex vivo expanded donor-derived VSTs for recipients of this stem cell source. Here we evaluated the feasibility and safety of ex vivo expansion of CB T cells from the 20% fraction of the CB unit in pediatric patients receiving a single CB transplant (CBT). In 2 clinical trials conducted at 2 separate sites, we manufactured CB-derived multivirus-specific T cells (CB-VSTs) targeting Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), adenovirus, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) for 18 (86%) of 21 patients demonstrating feasibility. Manufacturing for 2 CB-VSTs failed to meet lot release because of insufficient cell recovery, and there was 1 sterility breach during separation of the frozen 20% fraction. Delayed engraftment was not observed in patients who received the remaining 80% fraction for the primary CBT. There was no grade 3 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) associated with the infusion of CB-VSTs. None of the 7 patients who received CB-VSTs as prophylaxis developed end-organ disease from CMV, EBV, or adenovirus. In 7 patients receiving CB-VSTs for viral reactivation or infection, only 1 patient developed end-organ viral disease, which was in an immune privileged site (CMV retinitis) and occurred after steroid therapy for GVHD. Finally, we demonstrated the long-term persistence of adoptively transferred CB-VSTs using T-cell receptor-Vβ clonotype tracking, suggesting that CB-VSTs are a feasible addition to antiviral pharmacotherapy.
