Purpose/Objective:Reproducible patient positioning remains one of the major challenges in modern radiation therapy. Recently, optical surface scanners have been introduced into clinical practice in addition to well-established positioning systems, such as room laser and skin marks. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate setup errors of the optical surface scanner Catalyst HD (C-RAD AB) in different anatomic regions. Material/Methods:Between October 2016 and June 2017 a total of 1902 treatment sessions in 110 patients were evaluated. The workflow of this study included conventional setup procedures using laser-based positioning with skin marks and an additional registration of the 3-dimensional (3D) deviations detected by the Catalyst system. The deviations of the surface-based method were then compared to the corrections of cone beam computed tomography alignment which was considered as gold standard. A practical Catalyst setup error was calculated between the translational deviations of the surface scanner and the laser positioning. Two one-sided t tests for equivalence were used for statistical analysis. Results:Data analysis revealed total deviations of 0.09 mm ± 2.03 mm for the lateral axis, 0.07 mm ± 3.21 mm for the longitudinal axis, and 0.44 mm ± 3.08 mm vertical axis for the Catalyst system, compared to −0.06 ± 3.54 mm lateral, 0.53 ± 3.47 mm longitudinal, and 0.19 ± 3.49 mm vertical for the laser positioning compared to cone beam computed tomography. The lowest positional deviations were found in the cranial region, and larger deviations occurred in the thoracic and abdominal sites. A statistical comparison using 2 one-sided t tests showed a general concordance of the 2 methods (P ≤ 0.036), excluding the vertical direction of the abdominal region (P = 0.198). Conclusion:The optical surface scanner Catalyst HD is a reliable and feasible patient positioning system without any additional radiation exposure. From the head to the thoracic and abdominal region, a decrease in accuracy was observed within a comparable range for Catalyst and laser-assisted positioning.
Abstract Background Recently, criteria based on amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) have been proposed for response assessment in diffuse gliomas (PET RANO 1.0). In this study, we compare the prevalence of measurable disease according to PET RANO 1.0 with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria in glioblastoma. Methods We retrospectively identified patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wild-type glioblastoma who underwent [18F] Fluoroethyltyrosine (FET) PET and MRI after resection or biopsy and before radio-/radiochemotherapy. Two independent investigators analyzed measurable disease according to PET RANO 1.0 or MRI-RANO criteria. Additionally, lesion size, congruency patterns, and uptake intensity on [18F]FET PET images were assessed. Results We evaluated 125 patients including 49 cases after primary resection and 76 cases after biopsy. Using PET criteria, 113 out of 125 patients (90.4%) had measurable disease, with a median PET-positive volume of 15.34 cm3 (8.83–38.03). With MRI, a significantly lower proportion of patients had measurable disease (57/125, 45.6%; P < .001) with a median sum of maximum cross-sectional diameters of 35.65 mm (26.18–45.98). None of the 12 patients without measurable disease on PET had measurable disease on MRI. Contrariwise, 56/68 patients (82.4%) without measurable disease on MRI exhibited measurable disease on PET. Clinical performance status correlated significantly with PET-positive volume and MRI-based sum of diameters (P < .0059, P < .0087, respectively). Conclusions [18F]FET PET identifies a higher number of patients with measurable disease compared to conventional MRI in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. PET-based assessment may serve as a novel baseline parameter for evaluating residual tumor burden and improving patient stratification in glioblastoma studies. Further validation in prospective trials is warranted.
Abstract Purpose Patients with left-sided breast cancer frequently receive deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy to reduce the risk of cardiac side effects. The aim of the present study was to analyze intra-breath-hold stability and inter-fraction breath-hold reproducibility in clinical practice. Material and methods Overall, we analyzed 103 patients receiving left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy using a surface-guided DIBH technique. During each treatment session the vertical motion of the patient was continuously measured by a surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) system and automated gating control (beam on/off) was performed using an audio-visual patient feedback system. Dose delivery was automatically triggered when the tracking point was within a predefined gating window. Intra-breath-hold stability and inter-fraction reproducibility across all fractions of the entire treatment course were analyzed per patient. Results In the present series, 6013 breath-holds during beam-on time were analyzed. The mean amplitude of the gating window from the baseline breathing curve (maximum expiration during free breathing) was 15.8 mm (95%-confidence interval: [8.5–30.6] mm) and had a width of 3.5 mm (95%-CI: [2–4.3] mm). As a measure of intra-breath-hold stability, the median standard deviation of the breath-hold level during DIBH was 0.3 mm (95%-CI: [0.1–0.9] mm). Similarly, the median absolute intra-breath-hold linear amplitude deviation was 0.4 mm (95%-CI: [0.01–2.1] mm). Reproducibility testing showed good inter-fractional reliability, as the maximum difference in the breathing amplitudes in all patients and all fractions were 1.3 mm on average (95%-CI: [0.5–2.6] mm). Conclusion The clinical integration of an optical surface scanner enables a stable and reliable DIBH treatment delivery during SGRT for left-sided breast cancer in clinical routine.
