Trastuzumab emtansine is an antibody–drug conjugate comprised of the anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab linked to DM1 (emtansine), a potent cytotoxic maytansinoid derivative, by a stable linker. This structure results in improved tumor-directed cytotoxicity in HER2+ breast cancer with reduced systemic toxicities, particularly the cardiac toxicities associated with single agent trastuzumab. Phase III trials have demonstrated improved progression-free and overall survival in heavily pretreated patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer, with an acceptable toxicity profile. However, its role in first-line treatment is less clear. Ongoing studies continue to evaluate its role in neoadjuvant and adjuvant management of HER2+ breast cancer.
3549 Background: XMT-1536 is a first-in-class ADC targeting the sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein NaPi2b, broadly expressed in NSCLC and ovarian cancer. XMT-1536 utilizes the Dolaflexin platform to deliver 10-12 DolaLock auristatin payload molecules per antibody. In the dose-escalation portion of the Phase I study (NCT03319628), XMT-1536 showed clinical activity at doses >20mg/m 2 with confirmed responses and prolonged stable disease in heavily pretreated OC and NSCLC patients, without preselection for NaPi2b expression. XMT-1536 was generally well-tolerated without the severe toxicities observed with other ADC platforms such as neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, or ocular toxicity (Tolcher et al., ASCO 2019; Richardson et al., SGO 2020). Here, we report on the expansion (EXP) cohort, which included patients with fewer prior lines of therapy, in the ongoing Phase I study. Methods: Doses administered intravenously every 4 weeks (q4w) of 36 and 43 mg/m 2 were evaluated in two cohorts (1) high grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (OC) with up to 4 prior lines of therapy and (2) NSCLC adenocarcinoma; prior treatment with a platinum-based therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor, and TKI, if indicated. Archival tumor tissue and tissue from a new tumor biopsy were required for retrospective evaluation of NaPi2b expression. Results: As of 10 February 2020, 23 patients (19 OC and 4 NSCLC) were enrolled in the EXP cohort: 16 dosed at 36 mg/m 2 and 7 dosed at 43 mg/m 2 . Adverse events were generally similar to those previously reported, including transient AST elevation, fatigue, nausea, and pyrexia. Clinical responses and stable diseases have been observed. Efficacy data (objective response rate) and initial correlation of NaPi2b score with clinical response will be reported. Available data from all patients with data cutoff in May 2020 will be included. Conclusions: Overall, XMT-1536 treatment demonstrated clinical activity in high grade serous ovarian cancer and NSCLC adenocarcinoma and was generally well-tolerated with no new safety signal trends identified in the EXP. Clinical efficacy and the relevance of NaPi2b expression for treatment with XMT-1536 will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03319628 .
Abstract BACKGROUND In the first-line metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) setting, treatment with the combination of a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor plus platinum doublet chemotherapy has become standard of care1,2. The addition of antiangiogenic agents to immunotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer treatment3,4,5. Therefore, a combined anti-angiogenesis and PD-1 blockade strategy with a bispecific PD-1 and VEGF antibody may improve clinical outcomes. Ivonescimab (SMT112/AK112) is a novel tetravalent bispecific antibody (2 binding sites for PD-1 and 2 binding sites for VEGF) with an engineered Fc-null region and a half-life of 6-7 days. In the presence of VEGF, binding affinity to PD-1 increases more than 10-fold6. Given the correlation between VEGF and PD-1 expression in the tumor microenvironment6,7,8, simultaneous blockade of these 2 targets by ivonescimab drives antitumor activity9,10. Additionally, the engineered Fc-null region and shorter half-life could potentially lead to reduced adverse events, compared to co-administration of individual anti-PD-(L)1 and anti-VEGF agents7,8,10. At ASCO 2023, Zhang L, et al. (abstract# 9087) reported Phase 2 trial data, which included 63 first-line advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC patients without EGFR/ALK alterations treated with ivonescimab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin. These patients had an objective response rate of 67%, a median duration of response of 15 months, 9-month overall survival (OS) estimate of 93% (median OS not reached). Furthermore, ivonescimab was well tolerated in combination with platinum doublet chemotherapy with a treatment emergent adverse event discontinuation rate of 11%. TRIAL DESIGN HARMONi-3 is a randomized, blinded, controlled, multiregional Phase 3 study of ivonescimab combined with chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic squamous NSCLC. Approximately 400 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive ivonescimab (dual blockade of PD-1/VEGF) or pembrolizumab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel (Q3W, 4 cycles, 21 days per cycle) followed by single-agent ivonescimab or pembrolizumab maintenance therapy for up to 2 years, or until progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, objective response rate and duration of response (RECIST v1.1), as well as incidence/severity of adverse events. Key eligibility criteria include treatment naïve metastatic squamous NSCLC, ECOG PS 0 or 1 and exclusion of patients with major blood vessel invasion or encasement by cancer or intratumor cavitation. Citation Format: Jonathan Riess, Shun Lu, Jarushka Naidoo, Sara Kuruvilla, Annie Hung, Ahmed Khaled, Deborah Doroshow. HARMONi-3: A randomized, controlled, multiregional Phase 3 study of ivonescimab combined with chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C030.
Abstract The introduction acquaints the reader with the kind of child who might have been in need of intensive mental health care but whose needs would not have aligned with the existing institutional landscape in the 1940s. It then introduces residential treatment centers as a solution to this unmet need and explains how they were different from other forms of institutional and community care for troubled children. The introduction lays out the primary arguments of the book, focusing on the rise and fall of emotional disturbance as an organizing concept and the role of residential treatment in constructing normal children and promoting a nonconformist ideal of normal childhood. It ends with a description of the book's structure and brief summaries of the contents of each chapter.
Abstract For children at residential treatment centers (RTCs), individual psychotherapy provided a unique space in which children and their adult therapists could interact, each interpreting the other's words and actions and, at times, manipulating the other person for his own gain. Therapists hoped to change their charges' behavior and underlying personality, while children used therapy to express their emotions, understand and work through their problems, or exercise authority over adults. Simultaneously, many centers hoped to engage in individual therapy (often called "casework") with a child's parents, a task which was much easier said than done. This work was intended to help parents understand their child's behavior and make practical changes to their parenting styles and attitudes so that she would return to a healthier home environment. Out of necessity, these sessions often led to discussing parents' own emotional troubles, which were inextricably linked to their children's. Although child guidance clinics had long worked with both children and their parents, RTCs hoped to heal families even when parents and children were physically separated. Although this lofty goal often remained unfulfilled, it reflected RTC professionals' determination to treat families, not just individual children.
Tumors with neomorphic mutations in IDH1/2 have defective homologous recombination repair, resulting in sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition. The Olaparib Combination trial is a phase II, open-label study in which patients with solid tumors harboring IDH1/2 mutations were treated with olaparib as monotherapy, with objective response and clinical benefit rates as the primary end points.Ten patients with IDH1/2-mutant tumors by next-generation sequencing were treated with olaparib 300 mg twice daily.Three of five patients with chondrosarcomas had clinical benefit, including one patient with a partial response and two with stable disease lasting > 7 months. A patient with pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma had stable disease lasting 11 months. In contrast, clinical benefit was not observed among four patients with cholangiocarcinoma.These results indicate preliminary activity of PARP inhibition in patients with IDH1/2-mutant chondrosarcoma and pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. Further studies of PARP inhibitors alone and in combination in this patient population are warranted.
LBA110 Background: There are limited data on COVID-19 in patients with cancer. We characterize the outcomes of patients with cancer and COVID-19 and identify potential prognostic factors. Methods: The COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) cohort study includes patients with active or prior hematologic or invasive solid malignancies reported across academic and community sites. Results: We included 1,018 cases accrued March-April 2020. Median age was 66 years (range, 18-90). Breast (20%) and prostate (16%) cancers were most prevalent; 43% of patients were on active anti-cancer treatment. At time of data analysis, 106 patients (10.4%) have died and 26% met the composite outcome of death, severe illness requiring hospitalization, and/or mechanical ventilation. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, independent factors associated with increased 30-day mortality were age, male sex, former smoking, ECOG performance status (2 versus 0/1: partially adjusted odds ratio (pAOR) 2.74, 95% CI 1.31-5.7; 3/4 versus 0/1: pAOR 5.34, 95% CI 2.44-11.69), active malignancy (stable/responding, pAOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.06-3.5; progressing, pAOR 3.79, 95% CI 1.78-8.08), and receipt of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine. Tumor type, race/ethnicity, obesity, number of comorbidities, recent surgery, and type of active cancer therapy were not significant factors for mortality. Conclusions: All-cause 30-day mortality and severe illness in this cohort were significantly higher than previously reported for the general population and were associated with general risk factors as well as those unique to patients with cancer. Cancer type and treatment were not independently associated with increased 30-day mortality. Longer follow-up is needed to better understand the impact of COVID-19 on outcomes in patients with cancer, including the ability to continue specific cancer treatments.
<div>Abstract<p>Among 2,186 U.S. adults with invasive cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, we examined the association of COVID-19 treatments with 30-day all-cause mortality and factors associated with treatment. Logistic regression with multiple adjustments (e.g., comorbidities, cancer status, baseline COVID-19 severity) was performed. Hydroxychloroquine with any other drug was associated with increased mortality versus treatment with any COVID-19 treatment other than hydroxychloroquine or untreated controls; this association was not present with hydroxychloroquine alone. Remdesivir had numerically reduced mortality versus untreated controls that did not reach statistical significance. Baseline COVID-19 severity was strongly associated with receipt of any treatment. Black patients were approximately half as likely to receive remdesivir as white patients. Although observational studies can be limited by potential unmeasured confounding, our findings add to the emerging understanding of patterns of care for patients with cancer and COVID-19 and support evaluation of emerging treatments through inclusive prospective controlled trials.</p>Significance:<p>Evaluating the potential role of COVID-19 treatments in patients with cancer in a large observational study, there was no statistically significant 30-day all-cause mortality benefit with hydroxychloroquine or high-dose corticosteroids alone or in combination; remdesivir showed potential benefit. Treatment receipt reflects clinical decision-making and suggests disparities in medication access.</p><p><i>This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1426</i></p></div>
'%3e%3ccircle r='20' fill='%23008'/%3e%3ccircle r='17.5' fill='%23fff'/%3e%3ccircle r='3.5' fill='%23008'/%3e%3cg id='d'%3e%3cg id='c'%3e%3cg id='b'%3e%3cg id='a' fill='%23008'%3e%3ccircle r='.875' transform='rotate(7.5 -8.75 133.5)'/%3e%3cpath d='M0 17.5.6 7 0 2l-.6 5L0 17.5z'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(15)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' transform='rotate(30)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23c' transform='rotate(60)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' transform='rotate(120)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' transform='rotate(-120)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)