Introduction The importance of non-verbal cues in communication between physicians and patients is well published in the medical literature. However, few medical school curricula teach non-verbal communication. Chamber musicians employ non-verbal communication to coordinate musician intention. Observation of chamber musicians’ use of non-verbal communication may improve the understanding of non-verbal communication among medical students. Methods A total of 72 medical students attended rehearsals of two world-renowned string quartets on a single date. Following a brief discussion and demonstration on non-verbal communication by musicians, students observed the non-verbal cues employed by the quartets during musical rehearsals. Authors provided pre- and post-surveys, which included closed and open-ended questions to assess understanding of non-verbal communication and confidence in identifying non-verbal cues with patients and healthcare providers. Close-ended questions used numerical scales. The authors used paired t-tests to compare mean numerical scores pre- and post-intervention and analyzed qualitative, open-ended responses thematically. Results Of the 72 students who attended the workshop, 63 (88%) completed both pre- and post-surveys. Comparison demonstrated significant improvement in students’ ability to appreciate non-verbal interactions among healthcare teams (p<0.05) and patients (p<0.05). Following the workshop, students commented that they appreciated the similarities in non-verbal cues between musicians and medical professionals. Discussion Chamber musicians and physicians share similarities, e.g., working in teams and performing specialized tasks; good communication is crucial to both. Observation of chamber musicians may serve as a vehicle to instruct medical students on non-verbal communication. Next steps include determining the longer-term impact of the workshop on confidence in communication by resurveying participants and comparing responses with those students who did not attend the workshop. Future studies are needed to assess the clinical impact of chamber music observation on medical students’ non-verbal communication skills.
Infection is a serious complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT). However, the optimum oral agent for antibacterial prophylaxis in SCT recipients remains uncertain. Different antibiotics might affect incidence of blood stream infections, resistance, Clostridium difficile, gut microbiome, GVHD and relapse. To explore this we started this first clinical trial of levofloxacin (Levo) versus ciprofloxacin (Cipro) at our center. Methods: This is a single center prospective randomized study. Patients who meet the SCT program criteria to undergo autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are eligible. Results: We present interim results. 111 consecutive patients were randomized since June 2018. At the time of the present report 102 of these patients have follow up for 60 days or more. There were 62 males and 40 females. Median age at time of SCT was 61. Fifty received Cipro and 52 received Levo. Fifty-six patients had autologous (27 Cipro and 29 Levo) while 46 patients had allogeneic SCT (23 Cipro and 23 Levo). For allogeneic SCT, 12 patients in each group had ATG. Time to engraftment and length of stay were similar in both groups. In the Cipro group 6 patients (12%) had bacteremia while in the Levo group 7 (13%) had bacteremia. Of patients with bacteremia, in the Cipro group none had Gram negative bacteremia while in the Levo group 4 had gram negative bacteremia (OR 9.37, p = 0.137). In the Cipro group 6 patients had gram positive bacteremia while in the Levo group 3 patients had gram positive bacteremia (OR 2.22, p = 0.277). In the Cipro group, 6 (12%) had clostridium difficile while in the Levo group only 1 (1.9%) had Clostridium difficile (OR 6.95, p = 0.078). Acute GVHD of all grades accrued in 17 patients (34%) in Cipro group and in 16 patients (30.7%) in the Levo group. Grade III-IV aGVHD occurred in 6 patients (12%) in Cipro group and in 3 patients (5.8%) in the Levo group (OR 2.23, p = 0.277). The hazard ratio for progression free survival was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.27, 1.67), p=0.395 for Levo vs. Cipro. The hazard ratio for overall survival, adjusted for auto/allo and age at transplant was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.95), p = 0.041, for Levo vs. Cipro. However, 3 of deaths in the Cipro group were not related to type of antibacterial prophylaxis (listeriosis from contaminated food, fungal pneumonia in a wooden-house builder and stroke from intraventricular thrombus). So, unadjusted hazard ratio for overall survival (Levo vs. Cipro): 0.41 (95% CI: 0.13, 1.34), p = 0.142. Hazard ratio for overall survival (Levo vs. Cipro), adjusting for allo/auto and age at transplant: 0.39 (95% CI: 0.11, 1.33), p = 0.132. Conclusion: At this point, in this interim analysis, there seems to be a trend for Cipro to protect patients from gram negative bacteremia compared to levo. As a trade-off, there is higher trend for Clostridium difficile in the Cipro group compared to Levo group, but none is statistically significant so far.
Abstract Background: Existing scoring systems to predict mortality in acute pancreatitis may not be directly applicable to the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study was to derive and validate the ED-SAS, a simple scoring score using variables readily available in the ED to predict mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods: This retrospective observational study was performed based on patient level data collected from electronic health records across 2 independent health systems, one used for the derivation cohort and one for the validation cohort. Adult patients who were eligible presented to the ED, required hospital admission, and had a confirmed diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Patients with chronic or recurrent episodes of pancreatitis were excluded. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Analyses tested and derived candidate variables to establish a prediction score and that was subsequently applied to the validation cohort to assess odds ratio for the primary and secondary outcomes. Results: The derivation cohort included 599 patients, and the validation cohort 2011 patients. Thirty-day mortality was 4.2% and 3.9% respectively. From the derivation cohort, 3 variables were established for use in the predictive scoring score: ≥2 systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, age >60 years, and SpO2 <96%. Summing the presence or absence of each variable yielded an ED-SAS score ranging from 0 to 3. In the validation cohort, the odds of 30-day mortality increased with each subsequent ED-SAS point: 4.4 (95% CI 1.8 – 10.8) for 1 point, 12.0 (95% CI 4.9 – 29.4) for 2 points, and 41.7 (95% CI 15.8 – 110.1) for 3 points (c-statistic = 0.77). Conclusion: An ED-SAS score that incorporates SpO2, age, and SIRS measurements provides a rapid method for predicting 30-day mortality in acute pancreatitis.
Social determinants of health (SDOH) are fundamental to reducing health disparities. Our residents attempt to address barriers to SDOH at outpatient clinics in safety-net system of Detroit, Michigan. Our residents collaborated with case management, transferred local resource information into pamphlets, Quick Response (QR) codes, known as Community Aid Resource Distribution (CARD). This initiative was introduced to residents and faculty presentations and re-enforced through huddles. We developed questionnaires to assess residents’ attitudes towards SDOH and the effectiveness of CARD. Initial efforts demonstrated increased resident confidence in awareness of community resources. Residents reported that they were likely to recommend CARD resources to patients and found that QR codes to be efficient. Although most residents believed in providing community support resources, only a portion of residents reported always screening their patients for social needs. Thus, more efforts should be allocated to addressing social determinants of health. Additional areas of improvement should focus on inadequate screening by residents and more effective strategies for educating patients about community resources. Lastly, this study highlighted the need for case management particularly in an outpatient setting.
ABSTRACT Visceral artery aneurysms are rare, with an incidence of 0.01%–2% based on autopsy results. Among the visceral arteries, inferior mesenteric artery aneurysms are the rarest. To our knowledge, we report the first case of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in a 45-year-old man, arising from a nontraumatic pseudoaneurysm of the superior rectal artery, a branch of the inferior mesenteric artery. Urgent angiography provided the diagnosis and allowed successful hemostatic intervention via endovascular coil embolization. A subsequent routine colonoscopy revealed an ulcer with central yellow-bluish bulge in the distal rectum correlating with the site of the treated pseudoaneurysm.
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is characterised by encephalopathy, visual disturbances and seizures, accompanied by radiological parieto-occipital oedema. Immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory drugs are risk factors. While capecitabine-induced PRES cases are rare, this report details a young woman with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma on capecitabine. She exhibited symptoms of nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain before developing hypertension, drowsiness and a seizure. Brain MRI revealed parieto-occipital hyperintense areas indicative of PRES. Suspending capecitabine led to a gradually improved mental state. Prompt recognition and treatment of PRES offer reversibility, often achievable through dose reduction or discontinuation of the causative drug.
The importance of non-verbal communication on patient care has been well established in the literature. However, few health professional curricula teach these skills. Musicians employ non-verbal communication to coordinate their performances. Observation of musicians' use of non-verbal communication may improve the understanding and acquisition of these skills by healthcare professional students.
e21574 Background: Access to routine cancer care during COVID-19 pandemic was greatly affected. The impact of this on melanoma care is unknown. Breslow thickness (BT) was seen to decrease and then increase during and post-COVID-19 lockdown in Italy. Here, we aim to study the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on melanoma care in the United States. Methods: Patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma (CM) pre (September 15th 2019-March 14th 2020), during (March 15th-June 14th 2020), and post-lockdown (June 15th-December 14th 2020) were retrospectively studied using Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System (MDCSS) database. Patients without an identifiable primary lesion, or with ocular, mucosal, or acral melanoma were excluded. Demographic and clinical characteristics were reviewed. The primary endpoint was median BT during and post vs pre-lockdown. Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed for categorical and continuous variables, respectively, to compare groups. Interaction in subgroup analyses was assessed using likelihood ratio tests. Linear regression analyses were performed with Box-Cox transformed BT. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed for overall survival. Covariates for multivariable analysis were selected using LASSO-based penalized regression models. Results: 802 patients were included (pre N = 347, during N = 87, post N = 368). Patients diagnosed with CM post-lockdown were younger (age < 50 years pre = 14%, during = 13%, post = 23%). More patients diagnosed pre-lockdown carried government-issued insurance (pre = 48%, during = 39%, post = 38%). No difference (diff) in median BT was seen between periods (median = 0.6mm for pre, during, and pos). Married status was associated with a lower BT vs unmarried (diff = -0.19, 95% CI -0.36 to -0.014, p = 0.034) and higher census tract poverty level was associated with a higher BT (5%-10% diff = 0.17, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.33, p = 0.045; 10%-100% diff = 0.27, 95% CI 0.093 to 0.45, p = 0.003) vs 0-5% poverty on univariable analysis. Male gender was associated with a lower BT on multivariable analysis (diff = -0.12, 95% CI -0.20 to -0.04, p = 0.005) and lower risk of death on univariable analysis (HR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.82, p = 0.006). Conclusions: We found no difference in median BT during and post- vs pre-lockdown. We also identified at-risk populations (female, unmarried, and living in greater poverty areas) who could benefit from proactive melanoma care. Time to surgery from initial diagnosis during and post vs pre-lockdown would be of interest to study further.
