Objectives To assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of brachial artery (BA) cutdown with purse-string suture (PSS) for BA preclosure during fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (f-TEVAR). Methods We reviewed the consecutive data in our center from January 2022 to May 2023. Clinical data were analyzed retrospectively, including the baseline characteristics, procedural details, complications, and outcomes. Dichotomous data were summarized as absolute values and percentages. Continuous variables were presented as median values and interquartile ranges (IQRs). All patients underwent arterial cutdown with the PSS technique for BA preclosure. The technique was considered successful when complete hemostasis was achieved and confirmed by ultrasonography 24 h postoperatively. The patients were followed up 30 days postoperatively for access-related complications. Results Forty-eight patients who underwent f-TEVAR with 48 BA access sites were included [36 males and 12 females; median age: 62 (IQR: 30-78) years]. The median body mass index was 27.3 (IQR: 21.2-32.7) kg/m 2 . The median access establishing and closing times were 7.8 (IQR: 6-9.3) min and 3.7 (IQR: 2.5-5) min, respectively. The median operative time and length of stay were 75 (IQR: 63-87) min and 7 (IQR: 5-9) days, respectively. Although the success rate was 100%, partial numbness in the median nerve distribution was noted in 1 patient in the forearm. This resolved spontaneously and no permanent neurological problem was seen. No other access-related complications were noted, and the total complication rate was 2.1% (1/48). Conclusions BA preclosure with the PSS technique is safe and effective for left subclavian artery revascularization in Stanford B aortic dissection and can be another option for access closure during f-TEVAR.
Lung cancer is one of the most malignant cancers which is hazarding the people's health and life in the world. At present, it is a highlight to exploit antitumor drug from plant at home and abroad. The aim of this study is to observe the effects of polysaccharid (PS-T) on expression of angiogenic-related gene mRNA in human high-metastatic large cell lung cancer cell line L9981, and to explore its possible molecular mechanism.L9981 in vitro was cultured, and the growth data were obtained by trypan blue staining. The mRNA transcript expression of β-catenin, E-cadherin, TIMP-1, CD44V6, MMP-2, endostatin, VEGF was detected in L9981 by RT-PCR before and after treating with PS-T. The ability of invasion of L9981 was determined by Boyden chamber method.(1)PS-T had remarkably inhibitive effects on the growth of L9981 in vitro. The inhibitive rate of PS-T on L9981 was concentration-dependent. No significant difference of inhibitive rate was found among the PS-T (1g/L), cisplatin (3mg/L) and PS-T (0.05g/L) + cisplatin (1.5mg/L)(P > 0.05). (2)The mRNA expression level of β-catenin, E-cadherin, TIMP-1, endostatin and MMP-2 was upregulated, while that of VEGF and CD44V6 was downregulated. Out of them the mRNA expression level of TIMP-1 and endostatin was remarkably upregulated, the expression level of CD44V6 was significanyly downregulated. (3)The in vitro invasive abilities of L9981 was significantly decreased in the PS-T, DDP and PS-T+DDP groups compared with that in blank control group.(1)PT-S could inhibit the growth of human high-metastatic large cell lung cancer cell line L9981 in vitro, the effect is dose-dependent. (2)PS-T can down- or up-regulate the mRNA transcript expression of some angiogenic-related gene mRNA. (3)PS-T has remarkably coordinating effects with cisplatin in the L9981 lung cancer cell line.
It is well known that patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) had a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study aimed to identify the crosstalk genes between SLE and VTE and explored their clinical value and molecular mechanism initially.We downloaded microarray datasets of SLE and VTE from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) dataset. Differential expression analysis was applied to identify the crosstalk genes (CGs). Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed on the shared genes. The shared diagnostic biomarkers of the two diseases were further screened from CGs using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression. Two risk scores for SLE and VTE were constructed separately to predict the likelihood of illness according to the diagnostic biomarkers using a logical regression algorithm. The immune infiltration levels of SEL and VTE were estimated via the CIBERSORT algorithm and the relationship of CGs with immune cell infiltration was investigated. Finally, we explored potential phenotype subgroups in SLE and VTE based on the expression level of CGs through the consensus clustering method and studied immune cell infiltration in different subtypes.A total of 171 CGs were obtained by the intersection of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between SLE and VTE cohorts. The functional enrichment shown these CGs were mainly related to immune pathways. After screening by lasso regression, we found that three hub CGs (RSAD2, HSP90AB1, and FPR2) were the optimal shared diagnostic biomarkers for SLE and VTE. Based on the expression level of RSAD2 and HSP90AB1, two risk prediction models for SLE and VTE were built by multifactor logistic regression and systemically validated in internal and external validation datasets. The immune infiltration results revealed that CGs were highly correlated with multiple infiltrated immunocytes. Consensus clustering was used to respectively regroup SLE and VTE patients into C1 and C2 clusters based on the CGs expression profile. The levels of immune cell infiltration and immune activation were higher in C1 than in C2 subtypes.In our study, we further screen out diagnostic biomarkers from crosstalk genes SLE and VTE and built two risk scores. Our findings reveal a close relationship between CGs and the immune microenvironment of diseases. This provides clues for further exploring the common mechanism and interaction between the two diseases.
Objective To obseve the efficacy and safety of rh-endostatin injection(YH-16,Endostar),combined with chemotherapy on the multiple kinds of advanced malignancies.Methods Endostar combined with chemotherapy were administrated to 21 malignant cases of stageⅢ-Ⅳ confirmed by histopathology or cytopathology.15mg Endostar solved in 250ml of normal saline was slow intravenously dropped from day 1 to day 14,repeated after 7 day later.The chemotherapy agents which was not used before or not cross-resistant to pre-chemtherapeutic agents were selected to be given simultaneously.The regimen was repeated every 21 days.The effcacy was evaluated strictly after 2 cycles according to RECIST criteria,and quality of life(QOL)was evaluated according to Karnofsky scores.Otherwise safety was evaluated after 1 cycle according to NCI CTC 3.0version criteria.Results Among 21 cases,there were 2 cases of CR,3 cases of PR and 12 cases of SD,4 cases of PD.The objective response rate(RR)was 23.8% and disease control rate(DCR)was 80.9%.the efficacy of Endostar combined with chemotherapy was higher The quality of life(QOL) were improved on 6 cases,stabled on 11 cases,and decreased on 4 cases.The occurrence rates of G3 toxicities were low 4.76%(9/189),including thrombocytopenia(4/21),neutropenia(2/21),nausea/vomiting(2/21)and anaemia(1/21).These toxicities were mainly related with the chemotherapy agents.Conclusion The objective response and QOL of patients with advanced malignancies may be improved by endostar combined with chemotherapy.It is worghy of further clinical observation.
Background: Low lymphatic tumor burden would be associated with better prognosis, however, it still remained uncertain whether those clinically node negative colon cancer found to be pathologically diagnosed with node involvement could be a favorable subgroup in stage III disease and could be treated with radical surgery alone to avoid overtreatment. Methods: Eligible patients diagnosed with colon cancer without metastasis were recruited from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2016 using SEER*Stat 8.3.5 software (Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute) and divided into two groups: surgery group (n = 3081) and surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy group (n = 4591). Overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) differences were assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis, and survival differences were estimated with log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regressions were used to assess hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for colon cancer patients. Results: A total of 7672 pT1-3N1a colon cancer patients meeting with strict inclusion criteria of our analyses were recruited from 208751 colon cancer patients. The 5-year CSS rates of patients without adjuvant chemotherapy and patients with adjuvant chemotherapy were 80.0% and 90.7%, respectively. The receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy after the radical resection of the primary tumor was independently associated with 57.3% decreased risk of colon cancer-specific mortality compared with surgery alone (HR = 0.427, 95%CI = 0.370-0.492, P < 0.001, using surgery alone as the reference). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with improved prognosis and radical surgery alone was not enough in colon cancer with very low lymphatic tumor burden.