LBA602 Background: The increasing detection of renal masses presents a significant patient management challenge. Diagnostic options include cross-sectional imaging, which cannot reliably differentiate benign and malignant renal masses, and biopsy, which is invasive and subject to sampling errors. These limitations highlight the unmet need for accurate noninvasive techniques to guide patient management. Girentuximab is a monoclonal antibody that targets carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), an enzyme highly expressed in clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC). Radiolabeled 89 Zr-DFO-girentuximab (TLX250-CDx) is highly specific for CAIX and can aid differentiation between ccRCCs and other renal lesions. The ZIRCON study evaluated the performance of TLX250-CDx PET/CT for detection of ccRCC in adult patients with indeterminate renal masses (IDRM). Methods: ZIRCON was an open-label, multicenter clinical trial. Patients with an IDRM (≤ 7 cm; tumor stage cT1) who were scheduled for partial nephrectomy within 90 days from planned TLX250-CDx administration were eligible. Enrolled patients received a single dose of TLX250-CDx IV (37 MBq ± 10%; 10 mg girentuximab) on Day 0 and underwent PET/CT imaging on Day 5 (± 2 days) prior to surgery. Blinded central histology review determined ccRCC status. The coprimary objectives were to evaluate both the sensitivity and specificity of TLX250-CDx PET/CT imaging in detecting ccRCC in patients with IDRM, using histology as the standard of truth. Key secondary objectives included sensitivity and specificity of TLX250-CDx PET/CT imaging in the subgroup of patients with IDRM ≤ 4 cm (cT1a). Other secondary objectives included positive and negative predictive values, safety, and tolerability. The Wilson 95% confidence intervals (CI) lower bound for sensitivity and specificity had to be > 70% and 68% respectively for ≥ 2 independent readers to declare the study successful. Results: 300 patients received TLX250-CDx; mean age was 62 ± 12 y; 71% were males. Of 288 patients with central histopathology of surgical samples, 193 (67%) had ccRCC, and 179 (62%) had CT1a; Of 284 evaluable patients included in primary analysis, the average across all 3 readers for sensitivity and specificity was 86% [80%, 90%] and 87% [79%, 92%] respectively for coprimary endpoints; and 85% [77%, 91%] and 90% [79%, 95%] respectively for key secondary endpoints. For all readers, the lower boundaries of 95% CI for coprimary and key secondary endpoints were > 75%. For all evaluable patients, positive and negative predictive values were ≥ 91.7% and ≥ 73.7%, respectively. Of 263 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), 2 TEAEs were treatment related. Conclusions: This study confirms that TLX250-CDx PET/CT is well tolerated and can accurately and noninvasively identify ccRCC, with promising utility for designing best management approaches for patients with IDRM. Clinical trial information: NCT03849118 .
Humanized A33 (huA33) is a promising monoclonal antibody that recognizes A33 antigen, which is present in more than 95% of colorectal cancers and in normal bowel. In this study, we took advantage of quantitative PET to evaluate 124I huA33 targeting, biodistribution, and safety in patients with colorectal cancer. We also determined the biodistribution of 124I-huA33 when a large dose of human intravenous IgG (IVIG) was administered to manipulate the Fc receptor or when 124I-huA33 was given via hepatic arterial infusion (HAI). Methods: We studied 25 patients with primary or metastatic colorectal cancer; 19 patients had surgical exploration or resection. Patients received a median of 343 MBq (44.4–396 MBq) and 10 mg of 124I-huA33. Nineteen patients received the antibody intravenously and 6 patients via HAI, and 5 patients also received IVIG. Results: Ten of 12 primary tumors were visualized in 11 patients. The median concentration in primary colon tumors was 0.016% injected dose per gram, compared with 0.004% in normal colon. The PET-based median ratio of hepatic tumor uptake to normal-liver uptake was 3.9 (range, 1.8–22.2). Quantitation using PET, compared with well counting of serum and tissue, showed little difference. Prominent uptake in bowel hindered tumor identification in some patients. Pharmacokinetics showed that patients receiving IVIG had a significantly shorter serum half-time (41.6 ± 14.0 h) than those without (65.2 ± 9.8 h). There were no differences in clearance rates among the intravenous group, IVIG group, and HAI group, nor was there any difference in serum area under the curve, maximum serum concentration, or volume of distribution. Weak titers of human–antihuman antibodies were observed in 6 of 25 patients. No acute side effects or significant toxicities were associated with huA33. Conclusion: Good localization of 124I-huA33 in colorectal cancer with no significant toxicity has been observed. PET-derived 124I concentrations agreed well with those obtained by well counting of surgically resected tissue and blood, confirming the quantitative accuracy of 124I-huA33 PET. The HAI route had no advantage over the intravenous route. No clinically significant changes in blood clearance were induced by IVIG.
The use of radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) in the treatment of cancers is growing rapidly, with more agents becoming available for clinical use in last few years and many new RPTs being in development. Dosimetry assessment is critical for personalized RPT, insofar as administered activity should be assessed and optimized in order to maximize tumor-absorbed dose while keeping normal organs within defined safe dosages. However, many current clinical RPTs do not require patient-specific dosimetry based on current Food and Drug Administration–labeled approvals, and overall, dosimetry for RPT in clinical practice and trials is highly varied and underutilized. Several factors impede rigorous use of dosimetry, as compared with the more convenient and less resource-intensive practice of empiric dosing. We review various approaches to applying dosimetry for the assessment of activity in RPT and key clinical trials, the extent of dosimetry use, the relative pros and cons of dosimetry-based versus fixed activity, and practical limiting factors pertaining to current clinical practice.
Abstract Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane glycoprotein primarily expressed on benign and malignant prostatic epithelial cells. J591 is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets the external domain of the PSMA. The relationship among dose, safety, pharmacokinetics, and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activation for unlabeled J591 has not been explored. Patients and Methods: Patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer despite androgen deprivation were eligible. Each patient received 10, 25, 50, and 100 mg of J591. Two milligrams of antibody, conjugated with the chelate 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N, N′,N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid, were labeled with 5 mCi indium-111 (111In) as a tracer. One group of patients received unlabeled J591 before the labeled antibody; the other received both together. Toxicities, pharmacokinetic properties, biodistribution, ADCC induction, immunogenicity, and clinical antitumor effects were assessed. Results: Fourteen patients were treated (seven in each group). Treatment was well tolerated. Biodistribution of 111In-labeled J591 was comparable in both groups. The mean T1/2 was .96, 1.9, 2.75, and 3.47 days for the 10, 25, 50, and 100 mg doses, respectively. Selective targeting of 111In-labeled J591 to tumor was seen. Hepatic saturation occurred by the 25-mg dose. ADCC activity was proportional to dose. One patient showed a >50% prostate-specific antigen decline. Conclusions: J591 is well tolerated in repetitive dose-escalating administrations. The rate of serum clearance decreases with increasing antibody mass. ADCC activation is proportional to antibody mass. The optimal dose is 25 mg for radioimmunotherapy and 100 mg for immunotherapy. Phase II studies using J591 as a radioconjugate are under way.
<p>Supplementary Figures S1-4. Figure S1. 89Zr-J591 versus bone scan comparison of lesion positivity. Figure S2. Patient with metastatic prostate cancer (PSA of 10.1) with 89Zr-J591+ lesions that were not seen on MDP. Figure S3. Patient with metastatic prostate cancer (PSA of 0.62). Figure S4. Uniform prior distribution.</p>
