<p>Supplementary Table 1. List of the 21 genes included in the breast cancer panel used for sequencing, and the targeted coding regions in each case.</p>
<p>Supplementary Table 12. Baseline genomic landscape of mutations distribution for the CDR population (n=120), by number of mutations or presence/absence, across treatment arms.</p>
There is increasing evidence that different types of breast cancers are related to distinct risk factors. We analyzed the risk of breast cancer with respect to circulating insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3, 17beta-estradiol, estrone, testosterone, androstenedione and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), taking into consideration the characteristics of the tumors. Plasma hormone levels of 102 postmenopausal patients with breast cancer detected by mammography screening, and 102 matched controls were analyzed in relation to the histological type, the status of the estrogen receptor (ER), the progesterone receptor (PR) and the HER2 in the tumors. Significant positive associations were revealed between the IGF-I concentration and the overall risk of breast cancer (OR=3.1, 95% CI: 1.5-6.2), ER+PR+ breast cancer (OR=2.4, 95% CI: 1.1-5.4) and ER+PR- breast cancer (OR=4.3, 95% CI: 1.2-14.3) when the highest and the lowest ranges of IGF-I were compared. Significant associations were also found between the highest and the lowest quartiles of testosterone, resulting in OR=4.1 (95% CI: 1.8-9.4) for the risks of breast cancer and OR=5.8 (96% CI: 2.1-16.2) of ER+PR+ breast cancer. A synergy was seen between IGF-I and testosterone levels. When both plasma IGF-I and testosterone were in the highest quartile ranges, an OR=26.4 (95% CI: 1.6-426.5, p=0.021) was computed for breast cancer overall. No significant synergistic effects could be demonstrated with other parameters. There were significant, 2.5-fold (95% CI: 1.2-5.6), and 16-fold (95% CI: 2.0-133.5) increases in the overall risks of breast cancer and of ER+PR- breast cancer, respectively, when the highest and the lowest quartiles of IGFBP-3 were compared. No associations were found between any of the hormones and the risk of ER-PR- tumors. The increased prevalence of ER+ breast cancers in patients with higher levels of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 or testosterone implicate these hormones in the etiology of hormone-dependent breast cancer. Additional analyses specific for breast cancer subtypes may shed light on the value of hormone determinations for tailored chemoprevention.
The effect of gastric secretory inhibitors, vasoactive agents and gastrointestinal peptide hormones were investigated on gastric mucosal blood flow (MBF) and HCl secretion in 197 subjects. Changes in MBF were estimated by a new clearance substance, 99mTc-4-methyl-aminophenazone originally described by the authors. The procedure seemed to be suitable for characterizing changes in MBF without any toxic side effect or considerable radioactive loading of the patient or its surroundings. The studies were performed after a secretory steady state had been achieved by continuous pentagastrin infusion. Some experiments were done in the fasting stomach instilled with 0.160 N HCl. Secretory inhibition following atropine, pirenzepine, ranitidine and somatostatin was a primary effect of these substances, the observed MBF decrease being a secondary one. In contrast, vasopressin caused a fall in mucosal blood supply through vasoconstriction, the concomitant secretory inhibition being a secondary phenomenon. Certain doses of dopamine and terbutaline increased MBF without influencing HCl secretion. Glucagon in the dose used did not influence either mucosal blood flow or acid secretion. Synthetic secretin in the fasting stomach increased MBF without affecting HCl production; during pentagastrin stimulation it inhibited acid production while MBF remained unchanged. Cholecystokinin-octapeptide proved to be a direct vasodilating agent with a slight acid output increasing effect. Divergent effects of some drugs on mucosal blood flow and HCl production may be important in the pathology of hypoxic ulcerative damage and in the reparative processes of gastric ulceration. The 99mTc-4-methyl-aminophenazone clearance technique proved to be a reliable method for screening of drugs possessing vasoactive or secretion influencing properties.
1040 Background: The randomized phase III TURANDOT trial compared first-line BEV plus paclitaxel (PAC) vs BEV plus capecitabine (CAP) in HER2-negative metastatic BC (mBC). BEV-based regimens are often favored in TNBC [Dawood 2012] because of efficacy in subgroup analyses and a lack of effective treatments. We performed an exploratory subgroup analysis of TURANDOT to provide more data on BEV-based therapy in TNBC. Methods: Patients (pts) with HER2-negative mBC who had received no prior chemotherapy for mBC were randomized to either BEV–PAC (BEV 10 mg/kg d1 and 15 + PAC 90 mg/m 2 d1, 8, and 15 q4w) or BEV–CAP (BEV 15 mg/kg d1 + CAP 1000 mg/m 2 bid d1–14 q3w). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: Of 561 pts treated, 130 had TNBC. Baseline characteristics were typical of a poor-prognosis population and generally balanced between treatment arms, although fewer pts receiving BEV–PAC than BEV–CAP had ECOG PS 1/2 (25% vs 40%, respectively), positive lymph nodes (56% vs 72%), metastatic disease at first diagnosis (19% vs 30%), and liver metastases (27% vs 43%). Median age was 54 vs 56 years, respectively. At data cut-off, median follow-up was 21.4 vs 19.2 mo for BEV–PAC and BEV–CAP, respectively. The safety profiles in the TNBC subgroup were similar to the overall population. The predominant grade ≥3 AEs were hematologic AEs and neuropathy with BEV–PAC and hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea with BEV–CAP. Conclusions: One-year OS rates up to 78% in TURANDOT are among the highest seen in TNBC. BEV-based therapy is a valid option in a setting with limited active treatments. BEV–PAC may be favored based on 1-year OS, PFS, and ORR. Clinical trial information: NCT00600340. [Table: see text]