Abstract Background Since intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has become popular for the treatment of gynecologic cancers, the contouring process has become more critical. This study evaluated the feasibility of atlas-based auto-segmentation (ABAS) for contouring in patients with endometrial and cervical cancers. Methods A total of 75 sets of planning CT images from 75 patients were collected. Contours for the pelvic nodal clinical target volume (CTV), femur, and bladder were carefully generated by two skilled radiation oncologists. Of 75 patients, 60 were randomly registered in three different atlas libraries for ABAS in groups of 20, 40, or 60. ABAS was conducted in 15 patients, followed by manual correction (ABAS c ). The time required to generate all contours was recorded, and the accuracy of segmentation was assessed using Dice’s coefficient (DC) and the Hausdorff distance (HD) and compared to those of manually delineated contours. Results For ABAS-CTV, the best results were achieved with groups of 60 patients (DC, 0.79; HD, 19.7 mm) and the worst results with groups of 20 patients (DC, 0.75; p = 0.012; HD, 21.3 mm; p = 0.002). ABAS c -CTV performed better than ABAS-CTV in terms of both HD and DC (ABAS c [ n = 60]; DC, 0.84; HD, 15.6 mm; all p < 0.017). ABAS required an average of 45.1 s, whereas ABAS c required 191.1 s; both methods required less time than the manual methods ( p < 0.001). Both ABAS-Femur and simultaneous ABAS-Bilateral-femurs showed satisfactory performance, regardless of the atlas library used (DC > 0.9 and HD ≤10.0 mm), with significant time reduction compared to that needed for manual delineation ( p < 0.001). However, ABAS-Bladder did not prove to be feasible, with inferior results regardless of library size (DC < 0.6 and HD > 40 mm). Furthermore, ABAS c -Bladder required a longer processing time than manual contouring to achieve the same accuracy. Conclusions ABAS could help physicians to delineate the CTV and organs-at-risk (e.g., femurs) in IMRT planning considering its consistency, efficacy, and accuracy.
Objective This study aimed to update the possible clinical benefits of radiation therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer. Methods The medical records of 495 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after initially undergoing maximal cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy based on the pathologic stage between January 2010 and December 2020 were analyzed: 309 and 186 patients were treated without and with involved-field radiation therapy, respectively. Involved-field radiation therapy is defined as radiation therapy only to the areas of the body involved by tumor. The prescribed doses were ≥45 Gy (equivalent dose in 2 Gy/fraction). Overall survival was compared between patients treated with and without involved-field radiation therapy. The favorable group was defined as patients who satisfied at least four of the following factors: good performance, no ascites, normal CA-125, platinum-sensitive tumor, and nodal recurrence. Results The median age of the patients was 56 years (range 49–63) and median time to recurrence was 11.1 months (range 6.1–15.5). 217 patients (43.8%) were treated at a single site. Radiation therapy, performance status, CA-125, platinum sensitivity, residual disease, and ascites were all significant prognostic factors. The 3-year overall survival of all patients, patients treated without radiation therapy, and patients treated with radiation therapy was 54.0%, 44.8%, and 69.3%, respectively. Radiation therapy was associated with higher overall survival rates in the unfavorable and favorable patient groups. Patient characteristics showed higher rates of normal CA-125, lymph node metastasis only, lower platinum sensitivity, and higher rates of ascites in the radiation therapy group. After propensity score matching, the radiation therapy group showed superior overall survival to the non-radiation therapy group. Normal CA-125, good performance status, and platinum sensitivity were associated with a good prognosis in patients treated with radiation therapy. Conclusion Our study showed that higher overall survival was observed in patients treated with radiation therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer.
Data on subsequent arm lymphedema (SAL) after salvage treatment for locoregional recurrence (LRR) of breast cancer are limited. We conducted a study to evaluate the risk of SAL in patients with LRR.
Purpose:The optimal timing for radiotherapy (RT) after incomplete transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains unclear.This study investigated the optimal timing to initiate RT after incomplete TACE in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B hepatocellular carcinoma.Materials and Methods: This study included 116 lesions in 104 patients who were treated with RT after TACE between 2001 and 2016.The time interval between the last TACE session and RT initiation was retrospectively analyzed.The optimal cut-off time interval that maximized the difference in local failure-free rates (LFFRs) was determined using maximally selected rank statistics.Results: The median time interval was 26 days (range: 2-165 days).At a median follow-up of 18 months (range: 3-160 months), the median overall survival was 18 months.The optimal cut-off time interval appeared to be 5 weeks; using this cut-off, 65 and 39 patients were classified into early and late RT groups, respectively.Early RT group had a significantly poorer Child-Pugh class and higher alpha-fetoprotein levels compared to late RT group.Other characteristics, including tumor size (7 cm vs. 6 cm; p=0.144), were not significantly different between the groups.The 1-year LFFR was significantly higher in the early RT group than in the late RT group (94.6% vs. 70.8%;p=0.005).On multivariate analysis, early RT was identified as an independent predictor of favorable local failure-free survival (hazard ratio: 3.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.50-7.29;p=0.003). Conclusion:The optimal timing for administering RT after incomplete TACE is within 5 weeks.Early administration of RT is associated with better local control.
The authors apologize for the oversight in presenting incomplete affiliations for author Jin Sung Kim. Jin Sung Kim is affiliated with the Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea, and Oncosoft Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused. Assessment of deep learning-based auto-contouring on interobserver consistency in target volume and organs-at-risk delineation for breast cancer: Implications for RTQA program in a multi-institutional studyThe BreastVol. 73PreviewTo quantify interobserver variation (IOV) in target volume and organs-at-risk (OAR) contouring across 31 institutions in breast cancer cases and to explore the clinical utility of deep learning (DL)-based auto-contouring in reducing potential IOV. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Objectives: In our institutional experience, involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) yields favorable outcomes in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).This retrospective study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of IFRT in this patient population.Methods: Among patients treated with IFRT for recurrent EOC between 2010 and 2017, 61 patients with 90 treatments were included.IFRT encompassed all treatable lesions identified via imaging studies with 10-15-mm margins.Prescribed doses were ≥45 Gy (equivalent dose in 2 Gy/fraction).Results: Patients were followed up for a median of 19.0 (Interquartile range, 8.6-34.9)months after IFRT.The 2-year in-field control, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) rates were 42.7%, 24.2%, and 78.9%, respectively.Fifty-three IFRT sessions (58.9%) were followed by systemic chemotherapy, and the median chemotherapy-free interval (CFI) was 10.5 (95% confidence interval=7.3-13.7)months.A higher carbohydrate antigen-125 (CA-125) level correlated with a worse 2-year OS (69.2% vs. 91.0%;p=0.001) and shorter median CFI (4.7 vs. 11.9 months; p<0.001).Twenty-eight (31.1%) of 90 treatments yielded a long-term CFI >12 months.For patients with a normal CA-125 level and/or platinum-sensitive tumor, IFRT prolonged CFI regardless of pre-existing carcinomatosis, gross tumor volume, and number of treatment sites.Conclusion: Our early experience demonstrates the safety and feasibility of IFRT as an effective salvage therapy and enables a "chemotherapy holiday" in selected recurrent EOC settings.The CA-125 value before IFRT (within normal range) and/or platinum sensitivity could be used as selection criteria for IFRT.
Purpose We evaluated that early metabolic response determined by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) during radiotherapy (RT), predicts outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer. Material and methods Twenty-eight patients evaluated using pretreatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT (PETpre) and interim 18F-FDG-PET/CT (PETinterim) after 11 fractions of RT were retrospectively reviewed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was calculated for primary lesion. Predictive value of gross tumor volume (ΔGTV) and SUVmax (ΔSUVmax) changes was evaluated for locoregional control (LRC), distant failure (DF), and overall survival (OS). Metabolic responders were patients with ΔSUVmax >40%. Results Metabolic responders showed better trends in 1-year LRC (90.9%) than non-responders (47.1%) (p = 0.086). Patients with large GTVpre (≥120 cc) demonstrated poor LRC (hazard ratio 4.14, p = 0.022), while metabolic non-responders with small GTVpre (<120 cc) and metabolic responders with large GTVpre both had 1-year LRC rates of 75.0%. Reduction of 25% in GTV was not associated with LRC; however, metabolic responders without a GTV response showed better 1-year LRC (83.3%) than metabolic non-responders with a reduction in GTV (42.9%). Metabolic responders showed lower 1-year DF (16.7%) than non-responders (50.0%) (p = 0.025). An ΔSUVmax threshold of 40% yielded accuracy of 64% for predicting LRC, 75% for DF, and 54% for OS. However, ΔGTV > 25% demonstrated inferior diagnostic values than metabolic response. Conclusions Changes in tumor metabolism diagnosed using PETinterim during RT better predicted treatment responses, recurrences, and prognosis than other factors historically used.
Abstract Objective Radiation therapy plays an important role in adjuvant treatment for surgically treated cervical cancer with adverse pathological findings. This was the first study to evaluate current practices of adjuvant radiation therapy among centres affiliated with the Korean Radiation Oncology Group. Methods A survey containing specific questions on the demographics in 2019, indications of adjuvant treatment, radiation therapy field, prescription radiation therapy dose, boost radiation therapy and chemotherapy was sent out by e-mail to 93 centres. Results The overall response rate was 62.4%. Regarding radiation therapy techniques, intensity-modulated radiation therapy was adopted in most institutions (41/58, 70.7%). Various risk group criteria were selected for adjuvant radiation therapy and concurrent chemoradiation therapy. One or two risk factors among tumour size, depth of invasion and lymphovascular invasion were considered for adjuvant radiation therapy by 20.7 and 60.3% of the respondents, respectively. The following criteria for concurrent chemoradiation therapy were considered by 60.3% of the respondents: parametrial extension, positive resection margin or lymph node metastasis. Various upper borders were preferred for pelvic radiation therapy by the institutions, and a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions was the most prescribed dose scheme (37/58, 63.8%). Lymph node bed boost radiation therapy and vaginal cuff brachytherapy were considered for selected patients by 22.4% (13/58) and 60.3% (35/58) of the institutions. Conclusion This survey demonstrated the practice patterns of adjuvant treatment that are prevalent in the field of radiation oncology among members of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group. These findings warrant further consensus on radiation therapy guidelines in the context of adjuvant treatment for cervical cancer.