Current treatments of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) are effective, but expensive and susceptible to induce significant side effects.To evaluate the proportion of HCV patients who are eligible for a treatment.In a database comprising 1726 viraemic HCV patients, the files of 299 patients who presented to the same hepatologist for an initial appointment between 1996 and 2003 were reviewed.Patients' characteristics were age 43.1 +/- 15.6 years, 53% male and 92% Caucasian. The main risk factors were transfusion (43%) and drug use (22%). Genotypes were mostly genotype 1 (66%), genotype 3 (12%) and genotype 2 (10%). These characteristics were not different from those of the whole series of 1726 patients. A total of 176 patients (59%) were not treated, the reasons for non-treatment being medical contraindications (34%), non-compliance (25%) and normal transaminases (24%). In addition, 17% of patients declined therapy despite being considered as eligible, mainly due to fear of adverse events. Medical contraindications were psychiatric (27%), age (22%), end-stage liver disease (15%), willingness for pregnancy (13%), cardiac contraindication (7%) and others (16%). Only 123 patients (41%) were treated. A sustained viral response was observed in 41%. The treatment was interrupted in 16% for adverse events.The majority of HCV patients are not eligible for treatment. This implies that, with current therapies, only 17% of patients referred for chronic HCV become sustained responders. Some modifications of guidelines could extend the rate of treatment (patients with normal transaminases), but an important barrier remains the patients' and the doctors' fear of adverse events.
We report the history of a 20-year-old woman admitted for thrombosis of the sus-hepatic veins and of the inferior vena cava (IVC) with extension of the thrombus into the right atrium. The etiological research was negative and a diagnosis of idiopathic Budd-Chiari syndrome was retained. In view of the absence of vein repermeabilisation under adequate anticoagulant therapy, a venous thrombectomiy was performed under cardiopulmonary bypass, which improved the hepatic venous drainage. Budd-Chiari syndrome is a very serious disorder. Its treatment implies a step by step procedure. An effective anticoagulation must first be established. The complications of portal hypertension then require attention. For a symptomatic patient, one should assess the possibility of restoring the venous permeability, improving the hepatic drainage and decompressing the liver by radiological interventional or surgical procedures. Finally, an hepatic transplantation should be considered in case of treatment ineffectiveness, of fulminant hepatic failure, or of an evolution towards cirrhosis.
Variceal bleeding is frequently the initial presentation of a previously unknown cirrhosis. Portal hypertension and its complications without liver cirrhosis should raise the possibility of presinusoidal portal hypertension, and the diagnosis of hepatoportal sclerosis. These patients need to be investigated for coagulation disorders. A hypercoagulable state is often associated. Risks and benefits of anticoagulation should be further investigated in these patients.
Hemochromatosis is the most common genetic disorder in persons of northern European descent, and the majority of cases are caused by a mutation in the gene HFE. Genetic testing for hemochromatosis is therefore indicated in all patients with increases in transferrine saturation and ferritin levels. When this genetic testing does not demonstrate a hemochromatosis, other diseases responsible for elevated ferritin levels have to be ruled out, mainly hemolytic anemia, chronic inflammatory disorders, liver diseases such as hepatitis B or C, alcohol abuse, and non alcoholic fatty liver disease. In demonstrated iron overload with absence of classic causes, second-line genetic testing should be considered.