Introduction Patient-reported antibiotic allergy labels (AALs) are common. These labels have been demonstrated to have a negative impact on use of appropriate antibiotics and patient-related health outcomes. These patients are more likely to receive suboptimal antibiotics, have increased rates of surgical site infections and are more likely to be colonised with multidrug-resistant organisms. Increasing recognition that antibiotic allergy forms a key part of good antimicrobial stewardship has led to calls for greater access to antibiotic allergy assessment. PREPARE is a pilot randomised controlled trial of beta-lactam allergy assessment and point of care delabelling in perioperative patients utilising a validated antibiotic allergy assessment tool that has been repurposed into a smartphone application. The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility and safety of this approach in the perioperative outpatient setting. Methods and analysis Adult participants requiring elective surgery and are likely to require prophylactic intravenous antibiotics will be recruited. During the intervention phase, participants will be randomised to the intervention or control arm, with control patients receiving usual standard of care. Those randomised to intervention undertake a risk assessment via the smartphone application, with those deemed low risk proceeding to direct oral provocation with either a penicillin or cephalosporin. Study outcomes will be evaluated in the postintervention phase, 30 and 90 days after surgery. Feasibility of intervention delivery and recruitment will be reported as proportions with respective 95% CIs. Participants who experience an antibiotic adverse event will be reported by group with respective 95% CIs and compared using modified Poisson regression model with robust SE estimation. Ethics and dissemination This protocol has received approval from the Austin Health human research and ethics committee, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia (HREC/17/Austin/575). Results will be disseminated via publication in peer-reviewed journals as well as presentation at international conferences. Trial registration number ACTRN12620001295932.
This study aimed to investigate whether there was an association between an unanticipated prolonged post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay and early postoperative deterioration, as defined as the need for a rapid response team activation, within the first seven days of surgery. We conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study of adult surgical patients, who stayed at least one night in hospital, and were not admitted to critical care immediately postoperatively, between 1 July 2017 and 30 June 2019. A total of 11,885 cases were analysed. PACU length of stay was significantly associated with rapid response team activation on both univariate (odds ratio (OR) per increment 1.57, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.45 to 1.69, P < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (OR per increment 1.41, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.55, P < 0.001). Patients who stayed less than one hour were at low risk of deterioration (absolute risk 3.7%). In patients staying longer than one hour, the absolute increase in risk was small but observable within six hours of PACU discharge. Compar\ed to a one-hour length of stay, a five-hour stay had a relative risk of 4.9 (95% CI 3.7 to 6.1). Other factors associated with rapid response team activation included non-elective surgery (OR 1.78, P < 0.001) and theatre length of stay (OR per increment 1.61, P < 0.001). PACU length of stay was also independently associated with predefined complications and unplanned intensive care unit admission postoperatively. In our cohort, an unanticipated prolonged PACU length of stay of over one hour was associated with an increased incidence of rapid response team activation in the first seven days postoperatively.
Inadequate analgesia after thoracic surgery has been associated with postoperative pulmonary complications and prolonged hospital stay.[1][1] Regional anesthesia provides effective opioid-sparing analgesia and has been recommended during enhanced recovery after lung surgery.[2][2] Surgically placed
To evaluate primarily the relationship between postoperative complications and hospital costs, and secondarily the relationship between postoperative complications and mortality, following radical cystectomy.Postoperative complications were retrospectively examined for 147 patients undergoing radical cystectomy at a university hospital between January 2012 and July 2021. Complications were defined and graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. In-hospital cost was calculated using an activity-based costing methodology. Regression modelling was used to investigate the relationships among a priori selected perioperative variables, complications, and costs. The effect of complications on postoperative mortality was ascertained using time-dependent coefficients in a Cox proportional hazards regression model.135 (92%) patients experienced one or more postoperative complications. The medians of hospital cost for patients who experienced no complications and those who experienced complications were $42,796.3 (29,222.9-53,532.5) and $81,050.1 (49,614.8-122,533.6) respectively, p < 0.001. Hospital costs were strongly associated with complication severity: Clavien-Dindo grade II complications increased costs by 45.2% (p < 0.001, 95% CI 19.1%-76.6%), and Clavien-Dindo grade III to V complications increased costs by 107.5% (p < 0.001, 95% CI 52.4%-181.8%). Each additional count of complication and increase in Clavien-Dindo complication grade increased the risk of mortality 1.28-fold (RR = 1.28, p = 0.006, 95% CI 1.08-1.53) and 2.50-fold (RR = 2.50, p = 0.012 95% CI 1.23-5.07) respectively.These findings demonstrate a high prevalence of complications following cystectomy and significant associated increases in hospital costs and mortality. Postoperative complications are a key target for cost-containment strategies.Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN:12622000057785.
Retrospective analysis of difficult airway alerts in a major tertiary centre. To investigate the completeness, utility and efficacy of difficult airway alerts and their impact on future airway management episodes. Patients who had a "difficult airway" entry on electronic medical records (EMR) from 2011 to 2021 were included. Each alert was analyzed by a team of anesthetists with expertise in difficult airway management for its quality, appropriateness, and impact on future airway management episodes. Alert quality was defined as to whether the content of the alert contained pertinent information for emergent airway management. Alert appropriateness was defined as to whether the experts would be unhappy to perform a rapid sequence induction and intubation, if required, following review of all available documentation. 141 patients were included for this study, with a mean age of 58.6 +/- 15.3 years. Ninety-three (66%) alerts were created by medical staff, of which 52 were recorded by consultant anesthetists. 117 alerts (83%) were deemed to be appropriate by the airway expert team, but only 40 alerts (28%) were found to have sufficient quality to be helpful in emergent airway management. Sixty-five patients (47%) had at least one subsequent airway management episode, of which 35 patients (56%) underwent a change of management following alert creation. We proceeded to modify 103 alerts (73%) to improve their quality to aid future encounters. Difficult Airway encounters are an uncommon event in anesthesia, but clear, comprehensive and effectively communicated documentation is required to minimize the risk in future encounters. In our institution, while most difficult airway alerts were appropriate, we found significant heterogeneity in the quality of this documentation, which limits the clinical utility of the alert system. We have taken measures to improve local processes of difficult airway documentation and considered the implications of our project for the broader airway management community. Not applicable.
Abstract Study Design: Retrospective analysis of Difficult Airway alerts in a major tertiary centre. Objective: To investigate the completeness, utility and efficacy of Difficult Airway alerts and their impact on future airway management episodes. Design, Data Sources and Methods: Patients who had a “Difficult Airway” entry on Electronic Medical Records (EMR) from 2011 to 2021 were included. Each alert was analysed by a team of Anaesthetists with expertise in difficult airway management for its quality, appropriateness, and impact on future airway management episodes. Results: 141 patients were included for this study, with a mean age of 58.6 +/- 15.3 years. Ninety-three (66%) alerts were created by medical staff, of which 52 were recorded by consultant Anaesthetists. 117 alerts (83%) were deemed to be appropriate by the airway expert team, but only 40 alerts (28%) were found to have sufficient quality to be helpful in emergent airway management. Sixty-five patients (47%) had at least one subsequent airway management episode, of which 35 patients (56%) underwent a change of management following alert creation. We proceeded to modify 103 alerts (73%) to improve their quality to aid future episodes. Conclusion: Difficult Airway encounters are an uncommon event in Anaesthesia, but clear, comprehensive and effectively communicated documentation is required to minimise the risk in future episodes. Despite our Institution’s sophisticated alert system, difficult Airway management remains poorly communicated. We have taken measures to improve local processes of difficult airway documentation and considered the implications of our project for the broader airway management community. Trial Registration: Not applicable