Phase analysis and ejection fraction (EF) of the left ventricle were obtained by radionuclide angiography in 53 patients at rest, during submaximal exercise and 3-8 minutes after exercise. The standard deviation of the peak of the histogram of phases (SDP) was used as an index of the synchronicity of regional contraction. The material comprised 13 sportsmen and 40 patients who underwent coronarography, 12 of whom had normal coronaries and 28 significant lesions. EF, while comparable in the three groups at rest, increased significantly on effort in normals and did not change in patients with coronary disease. At rest SDP was higher in coronary patients than in normals (p less than 0.01), and during exercise, it increased, but decreased in normals (p less than 0.01). After exercise, mean EF decreased in comparison with exercise in normals (p less than 0.01), while the opposite was the case in coronary patients. Normals had lower SDP values in the post-exercise period than at rest; on the other hand, SDP of coronary patients was significantly higher in the post-exercise period than at rest (p less than 0.001). Phase analysis during, and particularly after, exercise was found to be superior to EF in detecting ischemic left-ventricular dysfunction, and should be used in conjunction with EF to evaluate patients suspect for coronary disease.
This study was designed to evaluate a method of automatic non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Using a Del Mar Avionics Pressurometer II, we tested 12 normal subjects at rest and during exercise in our laboratory, and 12 patients with borderline hypertension during 24 hours of normal activity. At rest correlation coefficient of sequential measurements between pressurometer and a standard mercury sphygmomanometer were 0.96 for individual systolic measurements, 0.65 for individual diastolic measurements, and 0.99 for sequentially coupled diastolic or systolic measurements. The same correlation coefficients were found during a low level exercise test on cycloergometer (50 watts); at a higher level (75 watts), the correlation coefficient for systolic measurements is still high (0.93), whereas for diastolic measurements the correlation coefficient is low (0.45) in our experimental conditions. Fifty-eight non-invasive ambulatory recordings were obtained during normal daily activities. About 10% of the measurements were eliminated because of artefacts. We conclude that the nycthemeral fluctuations of the blood pressure can be reasonably estimated by the Del Mar Avionics Pressurometer II, but that such results can be obtained only if special attention is given to the positioning of the pressurometer on a motivated patient.
Ambulatory monitoring of Korotkoff sounds appearance time (QKD interval) was performed during 24 hours in 131 normal subjects (85 males, 46 females, aged 14-78 years, mean 36 +/- 15 years) with a new device (Diasys 200RK, Novacor-France). This device allows simultaneous measurements of blood pressure, heart rate and QKD interval at programmed intervals, every 15 minutes in this study. For each patient we calculated the average 24th QKD interval, the QKD interval for a systolic BP of 100 mmHg and a heart rate of 60 bt/min (QKD: 100-60), and the slope (S) of the variations of the QKD interval against systolic BP and pulse pressure (PP). Results are presented for each 10 years age group (mean +/- SD).
Twelve students aged 21 to 39 years (mean age 26) with borderline hypertension underwent three 24 hours ambulatory recordings of blood pressure using an Avionics Pressurometer II device: the first recording under basic conditions, the second after taking placebo and the third after being treated for 3 days with a betablocker of long acting effect (oxprenolol R 160 mg) in a randomized study. The blood pressure mean profile showed a double peak during daily activity with a progressive lowering of the blood pressure during sleep. The effect on the blood pressure of long acting oxprenolol begins four hours later, remains for about ten hours and may be still present next day. The shape of the circadian blood pressure profile is not modified. No significant difference between the pressure profiles on the basic conditions and placebo is noticed.
