Abstract Background At time of cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), some patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are on an antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) while others are not. The impact of AAD use at time of CB PVI on the duration of post-ablation blanking period (BP) is unknown. Objective To determine whether the optimal BP duration differs between pts who were and were not taking an AAD at time of CB PVI. Methods We enrolled consecutive pts with AF who had initial CB PVI; all pts had an implantable loop recorder (ILR). We prospectively followed all pts and determined the time to last AF episode during the 90-day post-PVI BP. This was then correlated with likelihood of having an AF recurrence between 3–12 months post-PVI. Results The cohort included 165 pts (66±9 years; 99 [60%] male; 91 [55%] PAF; CHA2DS2-VASc 2.7±1.6). An AAD was being used at some point prior to ablation in 120 (73%) pts. An AAD was being used at time of CB PVI in 92 (77%) of these 120 pts; this was stopped at a median of 80 [36, 105] days post-PVI. We defined 4 distinct groups: (1) no AF in 90-day BP (n=75 [45%]); (2) last AF within 30 days of PVI (n=32 [19%]); (3) last AF within 60 days of PVI (n=17 [10%]); and (4) last AF within 90 days of PVI (n=41 [25%]). Patients not exposed to an AAD prior to CB PVI had significantly lower likelihood of having no AF in the first 90-days post ablation (p=0.004, Figure). In contrast, if AF was observed post-ablation, as time from ablation to recurrence increased, so did likelihood of long-term failure from ablation (Figure); this relationship was not impacted by use of an AAD. Conclusion The best long-term outcomes post CB PVI are seen in pts who had no prior exposure to an AAD and had no AF within the first 90 days of ablation. Subsequently, as the time from ablation to AF recurrence increased within the 90-day BP, so did likelihood of recurrent AF during long-term follow-up, irrespective of whether an AAD was or was not used. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (CB) is an accepted method for ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A three-month blanking period (BP) is commonly used in clinical trials and practice. However, when the optimal BP duration differs in patients (pts) on or off an antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) at time of ablation remains undefined. Objective To compare the BP duration in pts undergoing CB while either taking or not taking an AAD. Methods We enrolled consecutive pts with AF who had CB PVI while on an AAD. All pts had an implantable loop recorder (ILR). We prospectively followed all pts and determined the time to last AF episode during the 90-day post-PVI BP. This was then correlated with likelihood of having an AF recurrence between 3-12 months post-PVI. Results The cohort included 164 pts (66 ± 9 years; 97 [60%] male; 90 [55%] PAF; CHA2DS2-VASc 2.7 ± 1.7). Ablation was performed with 92 (56%) pts taking an AAD, which was stopped at a median of 80 [36, 105] days post-PVI. We defined 4 distinct groups: (1) no AF in 90-day BP (n = 75 [46%]); (2) last AF within 30 days of PVI (n = 32 [20%]); (3) last AF within 60 days of PVI (n = 17 [10%]); and (4) last AF within 90 days of PVI (n = 40 [24%]). Following the 90-day BP, 81 (49%) pts had a recurrence of AF. Long-term freedom from recurrent AF was similar in pts who did and did not use an AAD, irrespective of BP duration (Figure). Conclusion Our data suggest that the optimal BP duration in AF patients undergoing CB PVI while taking an AAD is 30 days. An AF recurrence after 30 days is associated with a very high likelihood of recurrent AF during longer-term follow-up, irrespective of whether an AAD is being used or not. Abstract Figure.
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are used for long-term ECG monitoring following catheter ablation in patients (pts) with atrial fibrillation (AF) to guide clinical management. However, little is known about what do when the ILR reaches end of service (EOS). Purpose To identify pts who underwent replacement of their ILR and determine the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of the replacement device. Methods We enrolled 222 consecutive pts with AF who underwent cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (CB PVI) and had an ILR. We identified pts who subsequently underwent ILR replacement. The diagnostic and clinical utility of the newly replaced ILR was determined. Results The cohort included 56 pts (64 + 9 years; 35 [63%] male; 27 [48%] PAF; CHA2DS2-VASc 2.3 ± 1.5) in whom the initial ILR reached EOS. They were followed for 3.7 ± 2.1 years. Recurrent AF was observed in 41 (73%) of these pts; this triggered an intervention in 17 (41%) pts (Figure). Of the other 15 (27%) pts without any documented AF, anticoagulation was withheld in 13 [87%] pts. Following ILR replacement, 33 (80%) of the 41 pts had more AF (n=11 [33%] required an intervention) and 5 additional pts had AF for the first time. Conclusions Our data show that after CB PVI, ILRs help guide decisions regarding rhythm management and oral anticoagulation. When the initial ILR was replaced by a second ILR, AF was detected (often for the first time) in some patients; the findings were used to guide clinical decision making in the entire cohort. Thus, at this time, it remains undefined when ECG monitoring of these pts can be stopped because it is no longer clinical meaningful.
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (CB) is an accepted method for ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A three-month blanking period (BP) is commonly used in clinical trials and practice. However, the actual BP duration in patients (pts) on an antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) at time of ablation remains undefined. Objective To objectively define the BP duration in pts undergoing CB while taking an AAD. Methods We enrolled consecutive pts with AF who had CB PVI while on an AAD. All pts had an implantable loop recorder (ILR). We prospectively followed all pts and determined the time to last AF episode during the 90-day post-PVI BP. This was then correlated with likelihood of having an AF recurrence between 3-12 months post-PVI. Results The cohort included 92 pts (66 ± 10 years; 62 [67%] male; 33 [36%] PAF; CHA2DS2-VASc 2.6 ± 1.7). AADs used included dofetilide (42), dronedarone (14), amiodarone (25), sotalol and propafenone (3 each), and flecainide (5). The AAD was stopped at a median of 80 [36, 105] days post-PVI. We defined 4 distinct groups: (1) no AF in 90-day BP (n = 45 [49%]); (2) last AF within 30 days of PVI (n = 17 [18%]); (3) last AF within 60 days of PVI (n = 13 [15%]); and (4) last AF within 90 days of PVI (n = 17 [18%]). Following the 90-day BP, 47 (51%) pts had a recurrence of AF. Once recurrent AF was observed > 30 days post-ablation, patients had high likelihood of having a long term AF recurrence (p = 0.037, Figure). Conclusion Our data suggest that the optimal BP duration in AF patients undergoing CB PVI while taking an AAD is 30 days. An AF recurrence after 30 days is associated with a very high likelihood of recurrent AF during longer-term follow-up. Abstract Figure.
Abstract Background Cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an accepted method for ablation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (PAF, PeAF). Freedom from AF in the blanking period (BP), conventionally defined as the first 3-months post-PVI, has been associated with the best long-term outcomes. However, the influence of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) during the BP on long-term outcomes is not well understood. Objective To compare long-term outcomes between patients who were and were not on an AAD prior to ablation and remained free from AF during the 3-month BP post CB PVI. Methods We enrolled consecutive AF patients undergoing CB PVI; all pts had an implantable loop recorder (ILR). No patient had any AF in the first 90 days post CB PVI. We divided the patients into three groups: (1) never had exposure to an AAD; (2) were intolerant to/failed AAD and thus were not taking an AAD at time of ablation; and (3) were on AAD at time of ablation. In the latter group, every effort was made to stop the AAD before the end of the BP. Results The cohort included 96 pts (66±10 years; 60 [63%] male; 55 [57%] PAF; CHA2DS2-VASc 2.5±1.4). There were 23 (24%) patients in group 1, 13 (14%) patients in group 2, and 60 (63%) pts in group 3. Patients in group 3 were more likely to have PeAF; AADs were stopped at a median of 36 days IQR (27, 91) in this group. Patients were followed for 1-year during which time 28 (29%) patients had recurrent AF (despite having no AF during the BP). The best outcome was seen in patients who never used an AAD; the worst outcome was seen in patients who were on an AAD at time of ablation (Figure 1). Conclusion Our data show that absence of AF during a 3-month post CB PVI BP alone does not guarantee good-long term outcome, unless the patient was never treated with an AAD. In contrast, in patients ablated while taking an AAD, recurrent AF was observed in 37% even though they were completely AF-free during the BP. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
Abstract Background Cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an accepted method for ablation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (PAF, PeAF). However, there are a paucity of data about the impact of body mass index (BMI) on one-year and longer-term outcomes following ablation. Objective To objectively understand the impact of BMI on outcomes following CB PVI. Methods We enrolled consecutive AF patients undergoing CB PVI; all patients had an implantable loop recorder (ILR), which transmitted data wirelessly daily. We assessed AF recurrences after excluding an initial 3-month post-ablation blanking period. Results The cohort included 222 pts (66±9 years; 143 [64%] male; 120 [54%] PAF; CHA2DS2-VASc 2.6±1.6). The mean BMI was 30±5. Patients were followed for 763±347 days, during which time 50% and 68% had recurrent AF 1- and 3-years post ablation. We divided the cohort based on the mean BMI into 2 groups: BMI <30 and BMI >30. Heavier patients were younger and more likely to have PeAF. Over 1-year of follow-up, patients with a BMI <30 had similar likelihood of being free of AF to patients with a BMI >30 (46% vs, 56%, p=0.0.097, Figure 1, left). However, as patients were followed for 3-years, freedom from AF was significantly higher in patients with a BMI <30 (59% vs. 81% in BMI >30, p=0.002, Figure 1, right). Conclusions Our data show that although patients had similar outcomes 1-year post-ablation, during longer-term follow-up patients with a BMI >30 had a much worse outcome. Our study uniquely offers objective (using an ILR) assessment of the impact of BMI on long-term outcomes following CB PVI (homogenous ablation strategy). These data highlight the need to identify strategies to improve outcomes in obese patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
