9556 Background: Preliminary tepotinib data showed durable activity in pts with NSCLC with METex14 skipping prospectively identified by liquid (L+) or tissue (T+) biopsy. Having met target enrollment of ≥60 L+ pts & ≥60 T+ pts, we report primary data. Methods: VISION Cohort A enrolled pts with advanced EGFR/ALK wt, METex14 skipping NSCLC (asymptomatic brain metastases [BM] allowed), who received oral tepotinib 500 mg QD. On-study treatment decisions were based on investigator assessment (INV) of response. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) analyzed in 3 primary ITT sets: L+ and/or T+, L+, T+. 2ary endpoints included ORR by INV, duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), PFS, OS, & safety. Preplanned analyses were performed in pts with BM at baseline (BL). BL/on-treatment ctDNA plasma samples (L+) were analyzed using a 73-gene NGS panel (Guardant360). Deep molecular responses (MR), defined as > 75% depletion of METex14, were compared with objective responses (OR). Results: By data cut-off (1 Oct 19) 151 pts received tepotinib (safety set); 99 L+/T+, 66 L+, 60 T+ pts comprised the 3 ITT sets with ≥6-month [m] follow-up. Across treatment lines (n = 44 1L, n = 55 ≥2L), primary ORR & mPFS [95% CI] in 99 L+/T+ pts were 43% [34–54] & 8.6 m [6.9–11.0] by IRC and 56% [45–66] & 9.5 m [6.7–13.5] by INV. ORR was similar in L+ or T+ pts (table) or in T+L− pts (n = 25): 40% [21–61] by IRC and 48% [28–69] by INV. Only 2 pts were T−L+. Outcomes were also comparable in pts with BM (n = 11): IRC ORR 55% [23–83] & mPFS 10.9 m [8.0–ne]. 34/51 pts (67%) with matched BL/on-treatment L+ samples had deep MR strongly associated with clinical response: 32/34 pts (94%) with MR had disease control (INV), including 29/34 pts (85%) with OR; 2/34 pts had progressive disease. Further biomarker data will be presented. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported by 37/151 pts (25%). 13 pts (9%) discontinued due to TRAEs. Conclusions: Tepotinib is a promising targeted therapy with durable clinical activity and manageable toxicity in pts with METex14 skipping NSCLC L+ or T+, including pts with BM. High ORR & DCR in pts with ctDNA molecular responses support that MET inhibition in METex14+ tumor cells can lead to clinical benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT02864992 . [Table: see text]
9012 Background: In the VISION study, tepotinib in METex14 skipping NSCLC pts (Cohort A) had robust and durable clinical activity. Serial LBx samples were collected for biomarker analyses, presented herein. Methods: LBx samples taken at baseline (BL), Week 6, 12, & end of treatment (EOT) were analyzed using Guardant360 ® CDx (73 genes). Investigator (INV)-assessed clinical outcome was evaluated per BL biomarker profiles and by molecular response (MR; defined as > 75% depletion from BL in METex14 variant allele frequency [VAF] ctDNA confirmed in 2 consecutive samples) or molecular progression (MP; defined as VAF increase > 0 from BL). Acquired resistance was investigated in EOT samples, following progression per INV. Results: LBx pts (n = 99) had a median age of 72 yrs (range 49–88), 53% were male, 44% never smokers, 85% had adenocarcinoma. INV ORR was 53% (95% CI 42, 63); ORR in 1L (n = 44) was 59% (43, 74) & ≥2L (n = 55) was 47% (33, 61). 94 pts had BL biomarker profiles; these were similar in 1L and ≥2L pts, except EGFR amp: 1/43 1L [2%] vs 8/51 ≥2L [16%]. Outcomes were not impacted by location/type of METex14 alteration. 1 pt with concomitant MET M1250T mutation had a PFS of 17.3 months. A trend towards better efficacy was seen in pts with concomitant MET amp (6 responses in 8 pts). Response to tepotinib occurred both in pts with wt or mutant TP53; however, there was a trend for longer mDOR in pts with wt TP53 (18.3 [95% CI 9.7, ne] vs 7.1 [4.7, 10.9] months) and mPFS (9.5 [6.7, 19.7] vs 5.1 [2.8, 6.9] months). Concomitant oncogenic mutations were rare, with no responses in 3 pts with KRAS, NRAS alterations and 3 responses in 5 pts with PI3K/AKT alterations. 65 pts had 2 consecutive on-treatment samples: 46 (71%) had confirmed MR, 5 (8%) had confirmed MP, 14 (22%) had no change in VAF or lacked confirmation. MR was associated with clinical response and MP was associated with no response/short PFS (Table). 52 pts with progression had EOT LBx samples. Emerging MET resistance mutations (Y1230H/C & D1228H/N) occurred in 7 (13%) pts, all responders and 5/7 had PFS > 10 months. Analyses on non-MET-driven resistance mechanisms will be presented. Conclusions: LBx biomarker analysis from the largest on-treatment data set for a MET inhibitor in METex14 skipping NSCLC, showed that ctDNA depletion in METex14 VAF is associated with improved clinical response in pts treated with tepotinib. This suggests serial LBx could help us to monitor response/non-response, understand resistance, and guide trials that test escalation/de-escalation strategies to improve outcomes and maximize QOL. Clinical trial information: NCT02864992. [Table: see text]
In the Biomarker-Integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination (BATTLE) trial designed in 2005, four agents against defined molecular targets were assigned to metastatic lung cancer patients based on predefined biomarkers. In this trial, it was demonstrated that a prospective biomarker-driven personalized therapeutic approach in lung cancer is feasible. In this article, preliminary results of this trial as well as the concept of biomarker-driven therapy of non-small-cell lung cancer patients will be summarized. As one of the results from this trial, re-biopsies of metastatic disease will become increasingly important and should be performed with acceptable risks for the patient, and combined with treatment options, whenever possible.
<p>Prevalence of PD-L1 expression on TC and IC in the PD-L1 BEP. *Includes patients whose tumors had <1% PD-L1 expression on TCs or ICs, but not absolute zero.</p>
<p>Subgroup analysis of confirmed ORR by PD-L1 TC and IC expression for (A) durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus EP versus EP and (B) durvalumab plus EP versus EP. In each panel, the shaded band shows the confidence interval for the ITT population; circle sizes are proportional to the number of responses. Groups are not plotted when there are ≤5 responses across both arms.</p>
